Re: Liberty Mutual plans major Boston expansion
Give us liberty, without bridge
Neighbors also want storefronts
By Thomas Grillo
Thursday, July 8, 2010
Some Boston residents are trying to put the brakes on a fast-tracked approval of Liberty Mutual?s $300 million expansion in the Back Bay.
Critics say a proposed employee-only pedestrian bridge and the lack of ground-floor retail shops for the new building are major flaws in the plan.
?The new building would not add any life to the street,? said Ann Gleason, chairwoman of the Neighborhood Association of the Back Bay. ?And the bridge takes a public space (above Stuart Street) and makes it private.?
Liberty Mutual is seeking approval for a 22-story tower at the corner of Berkeley Street and Columbus Avenue. The company has promised to add 600 full-time employees and to create 500 construction jobs.
John Herbert, a member of the Impact Advisory Group, a city-appointed panel, said the plan needs to be refined. ?If they?re going to do a bridge, it should be dramatic, illuminated at night and must be a significant statement that transforms Stuart Street,? he said.
Mayor Thomas M. Menino defended the insurance giant?s plan. ?They?re creating 1,100 jobs, no one else is doing that,? he said. ?Do they want to lose a corporate headquarters or work with them on expanding in Boston? That?s the question.?
Mark Slater, former president of the Bay Village Neighborhood Association, said planning should not be sacrificed because the company is offering jobs.
?There?s nothing that says you can?t create jobs and good urban design,? he said.
In February, the city approved tax increment financing for Liberty Mutual worth $16 million that provides property tax relief over 20 years. The deal was done, in part, because Edmund F. Kelly, the company?s chief executive, talked about the possibility of moving its headquarters to southern New Hampshire.
Liberty Mutual is also seeking a waiver for an environmental impact report because it argues the traffic impact would be minimal. In a filing with the state, the insurance company said the report ?will only serve to delay the project and delay creation of . . . jobs.?
A spokeswoman for the Boston Redevelopment Authority said the agency is still reviewing the proposal. ?Part of the review is to see if a pedestrian bridge is warranted,? said Jessica Shumaker. ?If so, it would have to be offset by a significant benefit to the public realm.?
In a statement, a company spokesman said, ?We are proud of the tremendous support we have received for our expansion project from residents, businesses and nonprofit organizations.?
Link