In theory we can walk and chew gum at the same time, but shouldn't there be an ungodly number of Inland Route frequencies before we consider anything close to eight daily round trips between Boston and Albany?
It's worth considering the broader scope of Amtrak service proposals receiving these grants, because that's not the only proposal/study:
- Green Mountain Corridor - Another VT service - NYC/ALB/Mechanicville/Bennington/Manchester (VT)/Rutland/Burlington - unclear on the frequency but it stated that it's in addition to Ethan Allen, not to shift/replace.
- Vermonter Corridor - additional partial frequency running to NYC/SPG/WRJ, taking 90min off the trip time between SPG and St. Albans, and actually getting to MTL with the existing service.
- Adirondack Corridor - 2nd round trip, reduced trip time.
- Empire Corridor - more frequencies, reduced trip time.
- Hartford Line Corridor - more frequencies, restoring + constructing some quantity of new infrastructure explicitly stated.
---------
Which is to say:
- MassDOT may only be planning on 2 more/extended trips to HFD/SPG with it's own planning to date, but I don't see any reason to think that
Amtrak is limiting their planning to that. Maybe I'm reading too much into it, but they seem to be thinking of more significant new infrastructure here.....which suggests some sort of plans to use it.
- Albany in this world wouldn't just have 8 more trips to Boston, but some number of additional Empire Service trips to the South + West, and at least 2 more trains to points north.
- Springfield would have at least one more train running up the line continuing north and again, it seems pretty clearly suggested that there'd be other increased service on the line from NHV/HFD.
-----
Given all that, if they all happened, I think you'd be in a world where there's much more potential for good, practical connections people might want to take at ALB + SPG than today.