Bananarama
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2020
- Messages
- 568
- Reaction score
- 1,122
...
It's not just another set of lawns. It's a set of lawns plus an esplanade with a killer view of downtown, plus a firepit where people can gather and relax in colder weather, plus a pavilion where you can buy snacks (and pee?), plus steps and a deck from which you get an elevated view of downtown. A lot of those elements would be harder to work into the original plan.
...
I think we'll just have to agree to disagree.
It's really the lawns that are a disappointment for me. As you said, no one is mentioning them, it's the view. The way you describe the skyline unfolding along it is nice and I didn't think of it that way before. I must confess I really don't like the view of the city from this location. Boston's peak PoMo stuff is a little too prominent. I'm a sucker for anything along Longfellow or along the Charles in Cambridge in terms of showing off the true gems here. But hey, this damn view is reposted on instagram like mad anyway.
Don't have a specific example in mind to match the conditions, but the Esplanade along the Charles is really the experiential comparison I'm making. A set-back path with landscaping buffering the river and some internal ponds. Pockets and promenades of trees where people cluster and hang out. Less exposed. Seems to frame the views across the river pretty well too.
What we have is fine. Perfectly nice as a public space. It's another hardscaped stretch of waterfront with funky seating.
I find the softer approach more interesting for showing a new way of occupying the coast. Letting the "natural" ecology of the harbor back into the walk instead of exerting the concrete hammer. Would have fit in better with the future climate resilience planning that was released last year. I'd be down with a hybrid of the two, with the promenade arc continuing through, over inlets and more complex landscaping. Less mowed lawn.