BronsonShore
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2014
- Messages
- 391
- Reaction score
- 1,123
Thats true but the waterfront I feel makes up for it, it came out really good and its really popular too. One of the better waterfront destinations downtown.
I was going to say the same thing -- you can walk around that warren of alleys on the waterfront.
You're both right, of course. The eastern end of the pier is poised to become an iconic Boston location--it's one of the first places I head to when I have visitors in town. But that doesn't excuse how awful the surrounding streets are.
Done right, tight little alleys that lead to water can be every bit as enticing as the waterfront itself.
They can create some of the best view corridors:
They can be activated in their own right:
The Thames is down there somewhere, but you'd take your time getting to the water walking down this street, wouldn't you?
They can create tiny little waterfront rooms that give you an escape from the crowds:
And they can even be more attractive than the waterfront itself. Which one of these two streets would you rather walk down?
There's absolutely no good reason for the Fan Pier streets to be as dead as they are. The developers just didn't care about them, and the city didn't demand better. And I know that many of you will point out that service entrances and loading docks have to go somewhere, but (a) that let's the city off the hook for always defaulting to the giant floor plate development that supposedly needs such areas in the first place, and (b) this isn't just a problem of loading docks--the ground floor of the Vertex building is horrible all the way around.
And again, they didn't even have to look to Europe like I did here; all they had to do was turn around and look at the other side of Northern Ave.
Last edited: