That's only one half of my point. I'll restate: Western, Central, and South Eastern Massachusetts are subsidized by the economy of Boston. That economy cannot function if everyone drives. Given that transit users choices (and cyclists and pedestrians) are allowing this economy to continue, car users underpay. By charging ALL taxpayers in the economy, transit users pay for THEIR service and drivers help fund a system THEY unequivocally benefit from either in time savings or redistributed tax dollars from the economy. You are saying that is "less fair" and I disagree. Also, such a distributed tax would include monies for RTAs in local areas and not just the MBTA. I'm part of the advocacy for reducing fares or making public transit free at point of service because the benefits to the environment and economy are undeniable."Drivers need to pay more" and "People should pay for the transit they use" are not even close to being mutually exclusive. Car infrastructure is subsidized and negative externalities are not adjusted for, drivers, particularly in Boston, should need to pay higher taxes on gas, vehicle registration, and congestion charges.