MBTA Buses & Infrastructure

I don't get why it makes more sense to them to have parking on the street there where it's not really needed and push the bike lane in like that. It's just nuts. 🤬
 
guitarguynboston said:
I don't get why it makes more sense to them to have parking on the street there where it's not really needed and push the bike lane in like that. It's just nuts. 🤬
Click to expand...
On the side of the convention center it's not parking it's pick up drop off which regardless of how much I like transit and bikes it's vital for the convention center, taxis and Uber/Lyft are always going to be big there.
 
What I like very very much about the full plan:

Is that it seems to be actually implementing the the A-Street-to-Black-Falcon parts of this plan from upthread:
Screen-Shot-2019-12-12-at-1.27.15-PM.png
 
guitarguynboston said:
I don't get why it makes more sense to them to have parking on the street there where it's not really needed and push the bike lane in like that. It's just nuts. 🤬
Click to expand...

You can't have a major destination like that with zero curbside access for cars/TNCs/cabs/shuttles to pull over and drop off. It's just not practical.
 
That makes more sense than parking. It's been awhile since I've been down there and figured drop off was on another side of the building.

But still shouldn't the drop off be where they are putting the bike lane in. I drive thru/in makes more sense so that arrivals don't have to walk across a bike lane. The whole thing just seems like a really bad design

HelloBostonHi said:
On the side of the convention center it's not parking it's pick up drop off which regardless of how much I like transit and bikes it's vital for the convention center, taxis and Uber/Lyft are always going to be big there.
Click to expand...
 
guitarguynboston said:
That makes more sense than parking. It's been awhile since I've been down there and figured drop off was on another side of the building.

But still shouldn't the drop off be where they are putting the bike lane in. I drive thru/in makes more sense so that arrivals don't have to walk across a bike lane. The whole thing just seems like a really bad design
Click to expand...

Bikeways don't need to be impermeable to pedestrians, but should have clearly marked crossings. If they switched the design and put the car drop-off "inside" the bikeway, then there would be two motor-vehicle crossings of the bikeway, which seems much worse than some pedestrian crosswalks marked on the bikeway.
 
chmeeee said:
You can't have a major destination like that with zero curbside access for cars/TNCs/cabs/shuttles to pull over and drop off. It's just not practical.
Click to expand...

Sure, but it doesnt have to be front and center.

They could be directed to the side street

goo.gl

Google Maps

Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.
goo.gl goo.gl
 
jass said:
Sure, but it doesnt have to be front and center.

They could be directed to the side street

goo.gl

Google Maps

Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.
goo.gl goo.gl
Click to expand...
But directing them to the side street also sends them across the bike lane twice, and at peak hours at the end of events that can mean lots of vehicles queuing up and blocking the bike lane. Having the bike lane away from those conflicts is better. This is a 15% design rendering so as the design goes on they will hopefully creatively use landscaping, fencing, curbs and markings to delineate the bike lane and the pedestrians, for example farther down Summer St where they have fencing and a crossing at the bus stop: https://www.google.com/maps/@42.350...4!1snNiS3CuTQIxVEaQz-0IrjA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
 
George_Apley said:
As a cyclist, I really don't get the problem with a curve in the bikeway around the drop-off zone.
Click to expand...
Me neither. ...and as a guy who has biked* to the BCEC, this whole stretch is already the "terminal zone" where:
BCEC-bound cyclists are either already looking for a dock/lockup
or
Through cyclists should be slowing down to protect the random-walk tourists (if they're on headed onward to Black Falcon-ish places)

*from North Station, by folding bike & from several points via Hubway/Bluebikes
 
Arlington said:
What I like very very much about the full plan:

Is that it seems to be actually implementing the the A-Street-to-Black-Falcon parts of this plan from upthread:
Screen-Shot-2019-12-12-at-1.27.15-PM.png
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure that the way I discovered archBoston (back when it was still Skyscraper something or other) was by finding a proposal ablarc had posted about a BRT route that mirrored this almost identically. That was maybe 17 years ago?
 
real_EthanHunt said:
public meeting for Washington St BRT next week:
www.boston.gov

Roslindale Bus Lanes

We are working toward prioritizing transit on Washington Street, between Roslindale Village and Forest Hills Station.
www.boston.gov www.boston.gov
"Following the success of the Northbound Bus Lane on Washington Street, the Boston Transportation Department would like to hear your thoughts on enhancements to the Northbound Bus Lane and a Southbound Bus Lane. "
Click to expand...

I attended this meeting. Not a whole lot to report, but here are a few key points:
  • Inbound lane will be extended on the north end across Ukraine, all the way to the Forest Hills busway
  • Corinth st. will be reconfigured with a bus/bike lane taking the travel lane on the Bank of America side, which will then feed in to the Washington St. lane
  • Corinth and Poplar will have bus stops moved and re-configured with curb bump outs. Corinth stop will be in front of B of A/Cohaset St., rather than at corner of Washington; Poplar stop will be at the junction with South St., near Wallpaper City
  • Stop consolidation between Firth/South and Tolgate Way, dropping from 3 to 2, with better access to crosswalks, signalization, etc.
  • Outbound lane will initially run as far as Murray Hill Road, but not all the way to Square, due to concerns about street space to be allocated to outdoor dining. This may change at a later date
  • City would likely establish resident only permit zone on abutting side streets
Of people who spoke or commented on the chat box, only one person was strongly against the changes. He was a large property owner who was concerned about the businesses and residents in his buildings not being able to park (maybe provide some parking as a land lord?). He said he intended to organize opposition among affected merchants. I didn't get the impression that the city cared, but that this was just letting people know what was going to happen. Otherwise, lots of strong support.

As somebody who travels this corridor most days, either by bike or bus, I'm giddy about this prospect.
 
George_Apley said:
As a cyclist, I really don't get the problem with a curve in the bikeway around the drop-off zone.
Click to expand...
Same. This configuration looks much safer and easier to navigate than any that involves uber/lyft/taxis crossing back and forth in front of the bikes.
 
HelloBostonHi said:
But directing them to the side street also sends them across the bike lane twice, and at peak hours at the end of events that can mean lots of vehicles queuing up and blocking the bike lane. Having the bike lane away from those conflicts is better. This is a 15% design rendering so as the design goes on they will hopefully creatively use landscaping, fencing, curbs and markings to delineate the bike lane and the pedestrians, for example farther down Summer St where they have fencing and a crossing at the bus stop: https://www.google.com/maps/@42.350...4!1snNiS3CuTQIxVEaQz-0IrjA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
Click to expand...

I hadnt seen the final version, that looks great. Yes, the fending is key
 
HenryAlan said:
I attended this meeting. Not a whole lot to report, but here are a few key points:
  • Inbound lane will be extended on the north end across Ukraine, all the way to the Forest Hills busway
  • Corinth st. will be reconfigured with a bus/bike lane taking the travel lane on the Bank of America side, which will then feed in to the Washington St. lane
  • Corinth and Poplar will have bus stops moved and re-configured with curb bump outs. Corinth stop will be in front of B of A/Cohaset St., rather than at corner of Washington; Poplar stop will be at the junction with South St., near Wallpaper City
  • Stop consolidation between Firth/South and Tolgate Way, dropping from 3 to 2, with better access to crosswalks, signalization, etc.
  • Outbound lane will initially run as far as Murray Hill Road, but not all the way to Square, due to concerns about street space to be allocated to outdoor dining. This may change at a later date
  • City would likely establish resident only permit zone on abutting side streets
Of people who spoke or commented on the chat box, only one person was strongly against the changes. He was a large property owner who was concerned about the businesses and residents in his buildings not being able to park (maybe provide some parking as a land lord?). He said he intended to organize opposition among affected merchants. I didn't get the impression that the city cared, but that this was just letting people know what was going to happen. Otherwise, lots of strong support.

As somebody who travels this corridor most days, either by bike or bus, I'm giddy about this prospect.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the update. I'm also quite excited by this. The total number of passenger-hours saved per day in the PM rush is going to be enormous.

A couple of minor questions:

1) There are four stops between Firth/South and Tollgate Way. Getting that down to two seems unrealistic. Consolidating the Mosgrove (OB)/Whipple (IB) stop with the Granfield Ave stop seems like the best way to eliminate a stop.

2) What's the deal with the name "Tollgate Way", anyway? There's no such street today and I haven't found one a historical map I checked either.
 
George_Apley said:
As a cyclist, I really don't get the problem with a curve in the bikeway around the drop-off zone.
Click to expand...

During major events, the BCEC crowd/security queueing spills out to cover pretty much the whole of the concrete in front of the building, to the point that it's difficult to get past on foot at peak entry times on that side of the street, and even with all that queue space sometimes pedestrian lines to back up all the way onto the bridge over the Pike.

Now, is the XX days a year when that's happening a reason to change the design of the bike lane, or do you just accept it's going to be blocked occasionally? I don't know.
 
millerm277 said:
During major events, the BCEC crowd/security queueing spills out to cover pretty much the whole of the concrete in front of the building, to the point that it's difficult to get past on foot at peak entry times on that side of the street, and even with all that queue space sometimes pedestrian lines to back up all the way onto the bridge over the Pike.

Now, is the XX days a year when that's happening a reason to change the design of the bike lane, or do you just accept it's going to be blocked occasionally? I don't know.
Click to expand...

I would say you don't design around the busiest days, because those are not possible to design around. Leave enough room at the pickup area for a typical event day. For the however many events a year that pack that space 100% for an hour or two, just assume all bets are off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top