Millennium (Hayward) Place | 580 Washington Street | Downtown

Those who complain about (or "protest") "gentrification" are using a mildly fancy word to hide what is really driving them: they feel that if they themselves don't want to (or, sometimes, can't) pay for something nice, then nobody anywhere near them should even have the option of paying for, any enjoying, that service or product.

It's a way of using class-war/Marxist arguments to keep quality of life low - at the level where you deem it acceptable - for everyone around you. Basically, you make yourself the lowest common denominator and bring everyone else down. It's a lovely thing, that.

I don't think that's what's driving a lot of people. When I was in planning school, folks really weren't able to deal with the inherent contradiction in gentrification - the disadvantaged and low-income should have access to nice things and nice neighborhoods, and low-income housing should (by ordinance) be provided in buildings for wealthier people, but when Capitalism drives up the cost of nice things and the disadvantaged get forced out, that's bad.

There's a reason that urban studies tends to drive people to Socialist ideas - restricting Capitalism is the only way to make sure that poor people get to live in pleasant and safe areas.

Of course, you also have to deal with people who want to preserve trashiness out of nostalgia, or to maintain their own sense of superiority for having "found it first," or because when you're talking about Downtown real estate it can be a very slippery slope until everyone but the super rich gets forced out of an area, as NYC and SF are finding out.
 
I dunno. Sounds like pretty standard anti-chain mentality to me. Not sure why you need to make it a political issue.
 
14779075000_9c171d2b34_b.jpg


14942725916_aa107db015_b.jpg


14778960319_ab01de84b5_b.jpg


14965639475_d617057719_b.jpg


14779029518_1385293fb8_b.jpg


14965295482_1697a47473_b.jpg


14965287262_acc44fa152_b.jpg


And what the heck, here's the interior of Caffe Nero:

14779076717_096bf1731c_b.jpg
 
Those who complain about (or "protest") "gentrification" are using a mildly fancy word to hide what is really driving them: they feel that if they themselves don't want to (or, sometimes, can't) pay for something nice, then nobody anywhere near them should even have the option of paying for, any enjoying, that service or product.

It's a way of using class-war/Marxist arguments to keep quality of life low - at the level where you deem it acceptable - for everyone around you. Basically, you make yourself the lowest common denominator and bring everyone else down. It's a lovely thing, that.

umm, what? The main complaint is that there are already multiple cafes in that area and people would be better served with a different, independent business going in instead of another cafe, especially one owned by a large corporation. There are plenty of "nice" businesses that people in JP support and the vast majority of people in that area can certainly afford a $3 cup of coffee.
 
God I wish I could afford to live in these new buildings sprouting up. IMO the location can't be beat, that first picture kz put up shows the type of neighborhood I'd love to live in.
 

Back
Top