Millennium Tower (Filene's) | 426 Washington Street | Downtown

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Filene's

Ron, I think that the objections are based on the utterly absurd concepts displayed on boston.com. They simply paint over the act of incompetence and vandalism on the part of the city and the developer. You don't paint a happy face on such things -- you hold them up as examples to drive forth real change.

As you well know, the "original" Filene's Building is a genuine landmark -- it's Daniel Burnham's last large-scale commission. I'm no engineer, but in it's current state, I think we could lose it.

Well said, Brut.
 
Re: Filene's

Thanks, briv.

As some of you know, I try to be more than just talk. The more I think of the state of Filene's and the deadening effect on Downtown Crossing, the angrier I get. I just spent five days in Chicago, a city where they preserve their rich architectural heritage yet build big fearlessly. Why can they do it, and we cannot? I don't wish for an economic (i.e. factual) response -- my question is one of philosophy and social value.

Are there enough archBOSTON boarders who are Boston residents and care enough about the anathema of the Filene's boondoggle to drag it into the spotlight of the mayoral election? Boston's built environment, and the "Suessian" bureaucracy that administers it, deserves a place in the dialogue, alongside our schools, safe streets, the economy, the environment, and all the other things that taxpayers care about.

Ned -- this one's for you, buddy: if you put a fraction of the energy you've put into obstructing the development of Columbus Center into spotlighting the epic failure on the corner of Washington and Franklin, you'd be doing a real service to the entire city. Anyone who reads your posts knows you're a smart guy -- why not show the world that you're also wise?

Shirley -- You've raised your voice for decades on behalf of the built environment. You and I don't agree on everything, but I know you have had misgivings about this project, and the Menino Administration's handling of it. Your good sense in protecting our urban fabric could really make a difference here.

Who else is in? PM me.

My favorite quote from Nietzsche could be applied to King Tom: "That which is falling should be pushed."

Away from your keyboards and into the streets!
 
Re: Filene's

The fallout from such a protest would just be anti-development invective that would wind up dooming other projects for years.

The "system" would be blamed for allowing Filene's to be torn apart in the first place, and handed to developers that the mayor would be alleged to be in the pocket of. No one is going to sympathize with the plight of big real estate deals caught up in the bureaucracy.

It's really not a problem that can be solved at the mindnumbing level of city politics and their infuriating discourse. It's something that should be worked out among experts in the mandarinate. That's one of the reasons I don't understand all the calls for the BRA to be disbanded instead of reformed. Yes, "expertise" has done shockingly bad things to Boston, but, if harnessed, it has far more power to do good than the anemia that results from tying development to the political process.
 
Re: Filene's

The fallout from such a protest would just be anti-development invective that would wind up dooming other projects for years.

A scatter-shot approach would likely result in what your describe. It's the opposite of what I'd advocate in this case.

The "system" would be blamed for allowing Filene's to be torn apart in the first place...

As well it should. The BRA is simply a tool to bring about a desirable result. In the ham-fists of our mayor, it's misused. Try swinging a hammer when you're not looking at the nail.

...I don't understand all the calls for the BRA to be disbanded instead of reformed.

I don't believe the BRA needs to be disbanded. I think it needs to be reorganized. It's senior staff needs to be vetted for political connections. And it needs the guidance of a visionary who understands what both Boston is, and what it can be.

Yes, "expertise" has done shockingly bad things to Boston, but, if harnessed, it has far more power to do good than the anemia that results from tying development to the political process.

Agreed.
 
Last edited:
Re: Filene's

In case no one noticed, the city built before the BRA existed was an enviable world class case of urbanity and architectural prowess. This continued even into the economic malaise and political stagnation stemming from septic corruption of the Curley era. Albeit at a much slower pace as businessmen, to an even much larger state during the Great Depression, weren't so quick to invest capital in a city where the mayor openly, and blatantly, shook them down to buy votes from the poor.

It was only when, the postwar movement to the suburbs threatened the tax base and the Federal government started pouring money into building programs did, the politicians greedy for dollars formed a cartel, i.e. the BRA. I find it funny that as blatant as a thief as Curley was, he never tried to directly control development to the extent the BRA now does.
 
Re: Filene's

Chicago has had its epic downtown development failures too -- google "Block 37" sometime.
 
Re: Filene's

Sounds like an ugly mess, Ron. Chicago isn't heaven -- they make mistakes there too.

I was in Chicago over Labor Day weekend and stayed two blocks west on Randolph (at LaSalle). Work appeared to be underway on the current incarnation of this project.
 
Last edited:
Re: Filene's

And what of Chicago's own hole in the ground courtesy of the stalled Chicago Spire project? Much as you might complain about the BRA or certain developers, the current delays are the result of an unprecedented (in my lifetime anyway and I've been around for a while) economic meltdown.
 
Re: Filene's

^ Nothing about the stalling of this project has been deleterious to the urban fabric of Chicago. I'd love to see the Spire rise someday.

Ron's example of Block 37, and the loss of the McCarthy Building is very unfortunate, and not at all characteristic of the preservation movement in Chicago.
 
Last edited:
Re: Filene's

Beton Brut,

I too wish the BRA was reorganized so the the planning arm was separated from the economic development arm. Planning would need to be isolated from overbearing political pressure as well. Boston is already much advantaged relative to most american cities, a different BRA could do much to reenergize and improve upon the city.

Regarding Chicago, my impression is that construction as well as demolition occurs at a much greater clip than here in Boston. Last time I was in the Loop about 5 yrs ago, I was dismayed to see the old Chicago Mercantile Exchange building knocked down. Here's a pic:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/34748725@N00/3089895493/

Although demolished approx. 5 yrs ago, from what I understand it's still a vacant lot.
 
Re: Filene's

Banker & Tradesman - Sept 14, 2009
Hynes Loses Big Office Portfolio

By Paul McMorrow

Banker & Tradesman Staff Writer

Today

The public face of the stalled Filene?s redevelopment in downtown Boston has taken a major hit in the northern suburbs. Public records show Gale International recently turned over the keys to a seven-building office portfolio.

The size of the lost portfolio ? 667,000 square feet of Class A space spread between Andover, Bedford and Billerica ? actually eclipses the 600,000 square feet of office that Gale has planned for One Franklin, at the former Filene?s site.

The loss isn?t just another black eye for Gale and John Hynes, Gale?s beleaguered CEO. It?s also a powerful example of how this commercial downturn is turning even seasoned investors into unfortunate case studies.

In the summer of 2006, Gale, Mack-Cali Realty and JP Morgan scooped up the portfolio for $53.6 million, or $80 per square foot. (Mack-Cali and JP Morgan are also partners in the Filene?s project.) At the time, the properties were less than 60 percent leased. That was part of the draw. As rents exploded, investors scrambled to scoop up buildings with large blocks of vacancy. They valued vacancies over solid tenant rosters, betting that they could fill those empty suites while rents were soaring.

In fact, Gale, Mack-Cali and JP Morgan were never able to turn a profit at the Andover, Bedford and Billerica properties. Mack-Cali?s SEC filings show that in the 36 months the partnership controlled the office portfolio, it posted a net loss of $13.8 million ? a figure that?s more than 25 percent the portfolio?s original purchase price. Last year, the portfolio lost $5.1 million.

The markets around Route 495 North never fully recovered from the decade?s first recession, and the area has been hard-hit by the current downturn.

At their peak, before the dot-com bust, vacancies in some parts of the I-495 belt stood in the low single digits. The bust sent those vacancies soaring, to 40 percent in the north. The vacancy rate only rebounded into the 20 percent range. Rents in the area failed to bounce back as well. In January, Banker & Tradesman reported that some landlords in the submarket were only netting $2 or $3 a square foot. And rents have eroded since that time. At the close of the second quarter, Class A asking rates stood at $18.61, according to data from Jones Lang LaSalle. Availability stood at 22.5 percent.

The deal also featured characteristic levels of leverage. Though the portfolio only sold for $53.6 million, Gale and Mack-Cali took out a mortgage from UBS for more than $58.6 million. The deal also featured a highly leveraged bridge loan to finance tenant improvement allowances. When UBS took the keys back two weeks ago, $44.6 million of the first mortgage?s principal was outstanding. The mortgage on the portfolio matured in July.

Mark Hickey, an analyst at Property and Portfolio Research (PPR), said his firm is predicting that rent declines will hit the 495-North region the hardest. PPR is forecasting rents in the area to plummet an astounding 40 percent. Those drops fall directly on landlords? bottom lines.

?It?s particularly hard on anyone who bought after 2005,? Hickey said. ?There was less and less equity in those deals. They were underwritten with tremendous rent growth assumptions. If your debt service was based on 5- to 6-percent annual rent growth, with losses in rent, you?re underwater on debt service.?
 
Re: Filene's

it sounds like they were playing by Monopoly rules or expectations where you can just keep leveraging and pyramiding with a constant increase in returns...though I guess that pretty much sums up the entire world wide property bubble....
 
Re: Filene's

Has anyone even been to Gale International's website recently? They have "One Franklin" listed as an "urban transformation" on their home page (it's flash, so let it scroll through to that image). The rendering is good, but the fact that they have it as a model for their firm is a bit embarrassing considering the status of this project.

*edit* have we seen these renderings? It said the page was updated late July


more: http://www.galeintl.com/gale-international/gallery.aspx/d=230/title=One_Franklin_Street
 
Re: Filene's

If this is the most recent plan, it's not terrible. There's a lot of variation in the street level facades, and the main structure echoes the Burnham building surprisingly well.
 
Re: Filene's

I like that alot actually.

I think this building would look great with a lighted crown at night.
 
Re: Filene's

the design is solid enough but they should do a little bit more to distinguish it from Russia Wharf...which it certainly resembles
 
Re: Filene's

I'm fairly positive we've seen that (or a very similar) rendering before, and everyone had similar comments. That doesn't really matter, because this project is looking dimmer by the day.

For the record, I agree. This design is very solid. Nice variation in street wall, the plaza looks like it would be successful, and the tower itself isn't too boring. No black walls, anyhow. But careful, the glass is never that clear. I would hope it doesn't turn out green like Atlantic/Russia Wharf.
 
Re: Filene's

It looks a lot stubbier though. They should slant the top.
 
Re: Filene's

the bright side (if there is one hear) is that something will definitely happen. Unlike Winthrop Sq. this has to get done when there is a chance.

I hope that Hynes is forced to sell this. He doesn't deserve to make a profit off it (this is the populist in me talking). But I hope someone else buys it and says, "I can start this building tomorrow, I need another 25 stories tho." It is the perfect place for a soaring tower, and we are gonna get another skyline stump with a lighted Menino crown.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top