Beton Brut
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 25, 2006
- Messages
- 4,382
- Reaction score
- 335
Re: Filene's
I apologize for not replying to this post sooner.
Caring requires knowledge and the cognitive ability to process information around a given issue into a realistic course of action. Doesn't sound like many voters to me.
Failure now could mean permanent failure. If we lose the Burnham building, it's a loss for the entire city.
You are correct to recognize that the scale and cost of Columbus Center are far greater. But the difference should be equally apparent:
I could have chosen my words better -- I'm not given to cheap shots. The post in question was written with more than an edge of frustration, and honestly, Ned, you're a frustrating guy. When individuals such as yourself, with a real understanding of problems and issues come forth, I expect them to engage in more than what's happening across the street from their home. A voice like yours can change the game, and I hope you have the good sense to raise it toward the preservation of The Arlington Building and the Dainty Dot.
There's plenty of unseen damage as well, from risks to the structural integrity of the Burnham building, to the deleterious effect to the economic viability to Boston's central shopping district.
I've got you reading this thread now, and that's more than half the battle.
I apologize for not replying to this post sooner.
The question is whether voters care enough.
Caring requires knowledge and the cognitive ability to process information around a given issue into a realistic course of action. Doesn't sound like many voters to me.
Filene?s is an epic failure (but only for the time being)
Failure now could mean permanent failure. If we lose the Burnham building, it's a loss for the entire city.
You are correct to recognize that the scale and cost of Columbus Center are far greater. But the difference should be equally apparent:
- No historic structure will be damaged, destroyed, or put at risk of loss, if Columbus Center isn't built;
- The "urbanistic deficiencies" at the Columbus Center site have existed for decades (it's an existing condition); the failure on the corner of Washington and Franklin was created by a perfect storm of civic and commercial incompetence (it's a manufactured condition).
I never obstructed air rights development, or parcels 16-17-18-19 development, or even Columbus Center; instead, I have worked hard to get development done there on the principles which taxpayers and toll-payers were promised, and which they have every right to expect:
? using competitive bids;
? at fair market value;
? with full financial disclosure;
? and Turnpike Master Plan compliance;
? at minimum environmental harm.
The Columbus owners continue refusing all 5 of these principles.
I could have chosen my words better -- I'm not given to cheap shots. The post in question was written with more than an edge of frustration, and honestly, Ned, you're a frustrating guy. When individuals such as yourself, with a real understanding of problems and issues come forth, I expect them to engage in more than what's happening across the street from their home. A voice like yours can change the game, and I hope you have the good sense to raise it toward the preservation of The Arlington Building and the Dainty Dot.
The Filene?s mess is more apparent because there?s visual evidence of the damage.
There's plenty of unseen damage as well, from risks to the structural integrity of the Burnham building, to the deleterious effect to the economic viability to Boston's central shopping district.
I am vastly more knowledgeable about Columbus than Filene?s...
I've got you reading this thread now, and that's more than half the battle.