MIT.nano | Kendall Square | Cambridge

Beeline -- as usual -- excellent portfolio of pix

Closing in should be complete in a moth or so

However, the complexity of the building means that infrastructure installation will take most of next year. The Building [still has no name of a donor ready for the cornerstone] wont actually be ready for major research equipment to begin to move in for more than one year. Final completion and dedication is still scheduled for 2018.

MIT buildings don't have names, they have numbers. [EDIT: as cca points out, some buildings do in fact have names, as in the Stata Center or the Green Building. The Koch Institute can refer to either Building 76 or the research entity inside the building. Most other buildings are referred to by their numbers, even if they do have names. Since this project already has the official name 'MIT.nano', it is unlikely to be referred to as anything else, even in the case it gets a naming rights donor.]

This will be Building 12.
 
Last edited:
The Koch center has a name. Its " Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT."

The Stata Center is called the "Ray and Maria Stata Center for Computer, Information, and Intelligence Sciences".


They also have numbers 76 and 32 respectively. Why? Numbers don't donate money to the endowment.

cca
 
Though they're all numbered, most of the MIT buildings also have names...the common spoken vernacular usually just employs the number (e.g., "I have lecture in 32-123"...e.g., big auditorium in the Sata Center). The names and numbers co-exist, but over time, more often than not just the number is referred to.

Here are several named buildings where no one says the name, just the number:
- Building 13: Bush Building
- Building 16: Dorrance Building
- Building 56: Whitaker Building
- Building 18: Dreyfus Building
- Building 2: Simons Building
- Building 5: Pratt Building
- Building 66: Landau Building
- Building E51: Tang Center
- Building E52: Morris and Sophie Chang Building
etc. etc.


Notable exceptions:
- Building 50: Walker Memorial...everyone just says "Walker"
- Oftentimes, admittedly, people just say "Stata" for Bldg. 32
 
MIT buildings don't have names, they have numbers. [EDIT: as cca points out, some buildings do in fact have names, as in the Stata Center or the Green Building. The Koch Institute can refer to either Building 76 or the research entity inside the building. Most other buildings are referred to by their numbers, even if they do have names. Since this project already has the official name 'MIT.nano', it is unlikely to be referred to as anything else, even in the case it gets a naming rights donor.]

This will be Building 12.

34f -- WRONGO BONGO -- while all MIT Buildings have numbers -- most in fact do have a name -- in some cases the name is recent as the building was being renovated

For instance:
  • the main complex [Infinite Corridor including Bldgs 3,4,10] is the Richard Cockburn Maclaurin Building after the President of MIT during the period of its construction
  • Building 7 the main entry to MIT and the beginning of the Infinite Corridor is formally known as the Rogers Building after William Barton Rogers the founder of MIT
  • Bldg 1 Part of the main complex but build later & closest to the bridge -- Hardly anyone knows that its name is the Pierce laboratory
  • Bldg 2 its companion on the East side closest to the river is the Simmons Building
  • Building 5 between Building 1 and Building 7 and home of the Ocean Engineering program is the Pratt School [of Naval Architecture]
  • Building 6 the mirror image [up to a point] of Building 5 is formally known as the George Eastman Laboratory after Mr. Smith [his nom-donation] whose generous donations of $30M built the main campus in Cambridge
  • Building 9 the home of the MIT School of Architecture and City Planning is now known as the Samuel Tak Lee Building
  • Bldg 54 the I.M. Pei designed & Tallest academic building is formally known as The Cecil and Ida Green Building after the principal donor and founder of Texas Instruments
  • and of course there is an exception - -Building 8 is well Building 8

if this whetts your apetite for the arcane geography of MIT see the following for more
https://whereis.mit.edu/

This is the Muckley Building
object-E40.thumb.jpg

is it Building E32, NE43, E40, or 88
 
The Koch center has a name. Its " Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT."

The Stata Center is called the "Ray and Maria Stata Center for Computer, Information, and Intelligence Sciences".


They also have numbers 76 and 32 respectively. Why? Numbers don't donate money to the endowment.

cca

CCA -- No the reason for the numbers and the names is you find your way around the Campus with the numbers which describe in MIT's weird geography where you are down to the individual room

The names come either from recognition of donors to the building or its renovation or recognition by the donors -- so that for example the duPont family has had a long standing relationship with MIT with many duPonts being alumni. Many other duPont - related people have been connected as well either as alumni or as members of laboratory steering committees. There is one building called the du Pont Athletic Center with the attached duPont Gymnasium and nearby duPont Outdoor Tennis Courts

But the duPont money also paid for I.M. Pei's 1967 the Camille Edouard Dreyfus Building the (18) home of the MIT Chemistry Department, the Ralph Landau Building (66) home of the Department of Chemical Engineering [and connected to Bldg 18 via Bldg 56 the Whitaker Building home of the new department of Biological Engineering, and the 2003 renovation of the Dreyfus Bldg by the Goody, Clancy and Associates

When the renovation of the Dreyfus was completed it was awarded the 2004 Merit Award Building Renovation by the Associated General Contractors of America and the 2004 Renovated Lab of the Year by R&D Magazine

as a footnote in the 2016 celebrations it was just discovered that a duPont also helped to pay for the original McLaurin Complex


But this where MIT naming get really weird [not wired] -- The physical building 32 -- known as the Ray and Maria Stata Center designed by Frank Gehry -- is actually composed of two sub-buildings connected by a kinda windin semi-non-Euclidean version of the Infinite Corridor -- "Charles M. Vest Student Street" [recently named after a recently deceased former president*1] -- the two towers are the Gates [yes Bill's donation] and the Dreyfoos Building and then there is the Kirsch Auditorium (32-123) which is not part officially of either of the two towers and the Forbes Family Cafe located along "the Street" [also not officially in either tower]

If this has made you hungry -- here's a URL where you can find the best in MIT Retail Dining options
http://dining.mit.edu/retaildining

More on the Stata Complex can be found on several MIT websites including
http://web.mit.edu/facilities/construction/completed/stata.html

Frank O. Gehry, the Stata Center is meant to carry on Building 20's innovative and serendipitous spirit, and to foster interaction and collaboration across many disciplines.
The building is home to the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL), the Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems (LIDS) and the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy. Its striking design—featuring tilting towers, many-angled walls and whimsical shapes—challenges much of the conventional wisdom of laboratory and campus building.
When the building opened in 2004, Pulitzer Prize-winning critic Robert Campbell wrote in the Boston Globe that the building is "a work of architecture that embodies serious thinking about how people live and work, and at the same time shouts the joy of invention."

I usually like what Mr. Campbell writes -- but that was too too obsequious for words -- see the joke below


Not on the website was the great joke personally told to Mr. Gehry by your humble correspondent when he gave a tour of the building which I had the pleasure to attend

Westie: what's the only building on campus [at the time] designed to withstand a Richter 7.0 earthquake, but which looks as if it didn't

Gehry: I have no clue

Westie [chuckling]: Were standing in it

Gehry [with a great diplomatic response]: I get it

we then chatted amicably about Bld 20 [never given a name despite its more than 50 year existence] and how it influenced his design of the Stata



*1 -- full disclosure Chuck Vest was a mentor of mine and a good friend for many years
 
CCA -- No the reason for the numbers and the names is you find your way around the Campus with the numbers which describe in MIT's weird geography where you are down to the individual room

ok
 

CCA -- once you are on the MIT Campus and know the code -- you don't need a GPS to navigate -- even the Men's and Women's facilities rooms are numbered

Starting at Building 10 Loby and facing the river -- all buildings to your left are Even and all Buildings to your right are Odd

The further you are from the River the higher the number -- ao Bldg 1 and Bldg 2 are the furthest extensions of the Main Complex toward the river with Bldg 1 on Mass Ave and Bldg 2 directly across Killean Court`[interestingly enough the open spaces all have only names]

On Mass Ave as you head from Building 1 toward Vassar St. the buildings are successively 1, 5, 7, 7A, 9, 17, 33, 35 -- Buildings 3 and 11, 13, 31 are inboard

Turning the corner on Vassar St. the Buildings are successively 35, 37, 39, 38, 36, 32 -- Note the system gets a bit complicated around Bldg 36-38 as heading back toward Bldg 10 you come to infill Bldg 34 and then 24 -- the next building is NANO Bldg 12 [however it is not fully at this point anyway connected to the network]. If you continue through Bldg 36 and turn the corner you come to the now Venerable [circa immediate post WW II] Bldg 26 and then 16 the beginning of the eastern extension of the main academic complex -- continuing through 16 toward the river you encounter 8, 6, and finally arrive at 2. However paralleling 6 heading toward Killean Court is 4 [similar to 5 and 3] and then some weird infills 6B and the much larger 6C
pdsi.jpg
full of theoretical physicist and a Sol LeWitt Floor
%2319%20Sol%20LeWitt%20copy.jpg
MIT-22-copy-e1407167594589.jpg

[there is no 6A except underground]

If you kept going at the end of Bldg 36 [except on the ground Floor you would enter Bld 32 the Stata Center complex [specifically Bldg 32D "Dreyfoos"] following the "Charles Vest Student Street" would take you to the other tower 32G "Gates" --walk out the door of the Gates and you Come to Bldg 76 the Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research [Note its not connected to any of the other buildings] on the most intensive R&D corner on the planet where Vasser, Galileo and Main Intersect

Standing in the middle of that intersection you are surrounded by MIT's Bldg 46 [Brain & Cognitive Sciences Complex] across Vasser from the Stata Complex and across Main from Technology Square [Home of MIT's Institute for Soldier Nanotechnology and Novartis amongst others] and across Galileo Way from the Whitehead Institute and its scion the Broad Institute on the corner of Mass Ave and Ames on whose opposite corner is Google. Behind Tech Square moving toward and bridging Broadway is Draper and Schlumberger-Doll Research

Back Across Main next to Koch IICR on the Corner of Ames is Bldg 68 the Koch Biology Building [where you will find surprise surprise the MIT Dept of Biology] -- leaving the Koch Bio inside and continuing parallel to Ames you come to Bldg 66 the Ralph Landau Bldg {gift of the duPonts and home of the Department of Chemical Engineering] the Landau is as far as you can go on the surface back toward the river. Right on Ames are Bldg 64 and parallel and just inboard 62 both part of the East Campus Student Dorms [the only dorms reachable from the academic complex without crossing a street] Closer to the River is the Walker Memorial [hardly anyone knows it by the Building Number Bldg 50 home to MIT's original Dining Hall] heading along Mem Drive toward Killian Court you come to Bldg 14 [The Hayden Memorial Library Complex] -- follow a short corridor and you are back in the Main Complex at Bldg 2

So has the tour of the main academic complex which grew organically onto the original McLaren Buildings been completed you asK -- NO

There are a couple of buildings in and around Eastman and McDermott Courts including the iconic Bldg 54 the Cecil and Ida Green Building of IM Pei housing the Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences and appearing to be out in the middle -- but fear not tunnels connect it to the Hayden Library Complex and to Bldg 18 the Camille Edouard Dreyfus Building [yes a homonym building] Home of the Dept of Chemistry and another gift of the duPonts -- it in turn connects to the junction between Bldg 16 [Dorrance Bldg] and Bldg 56 [Whitaker Bldg] Home to MIT's newest department Department of Biological Engineering [home of Course 20 -- yes the curriculum is numbered as well -- for example "20.430 Fields, Forces, and Flows in Biological Systems"

Now we are done -- NO -- besides all of the Building with strange numbers such as: E-90 located so far east that its almost on the Longfellow Bridge; NE-123 with MIT's highest building number all the way to Bent St.;NW86 Graduate housing on Sidney St; NW12 the iconic dome, nondescript old industrial building and cooling tower of the Nuclear Reactor Complex; Plasma Science & Fusion Center (NW21) and just across the tracks to W-45 [the West Garage -- yea garages have numbers too]; and all the way to W91 home of some of MITs super computing and formerly MIT's supersonic wind tunnel [only the Big electrical distribution and heavy duty cooling is left]; WW15 so far west its almost on the BU Bridge and home of a warehouse -- not to be confused with NW-30 [officially named the Warehouse but actually 1 year graduate student housing]

Well the one remaining building on the main academic complex -- right behind the Stata Center is Building 57 MIT's original Swimming Pool

Before we end our tour of the main academic complex -- one bit of trivia if you are ever stuck in increment weather in the main academic complex -- you can walk under cover all the way from the Harvard Bridge [aka Mass Ave bridge] to the Corner of Ames and Main [Koch Bio back door] leaving only a few more steps to the safety of the Kendall MIT T -- soon with the new construction all you will need to be exposed is when crossing Ames St -- although there are already rumours of subterranean passages [note not all such rumours are credible as there is no humanly passable connection under Mass Ave]
 
Just to be clear. I did say ... ok.

cca
 
Do we really need all these lengthy, didactic, irrelevant posts about the naming/numbering schemes at MIT? Can we get this back on topic please?
 
Do we really need all these lengthy, didactic, irrelevant posts about the naming/numbering schemes at MIT? Can we get this back on topic please?

Gameguy -- I call youir attention to the fact that the discussion began about numbering for the .NANO versus a name

well at this point its still .NANO and Bldg 12

Turning the corner on Vassar St. the Buildings are successively 35, 37, 39, 38, 36, 32 -- Note the system gets a bit complicated around Bldg 36-38 as heading back toward Bldg 10 you come to infill Bldg 34 and then 24 -- the next building is NANO Bldg 12 [however it is not fully at this point anyway connected to the network]. If you continue through Bldg 36 and turn the corner you come to the now Venerable [circa immediate post WW II] Bldg 26 and then 16 the beginning of the eastern extension of the main academic complex -- continuing through 16 toward the river you encounter 8, 6, and finally arrive at 2. However paralleling 6 heading toward Killean Court is 4 [similar to 5
 
^ Nice photos, as always, Beeline. I just wanted to comment that I walk by this frequently and am highly impressed with the choice of glass. The black trim, the choice of tint, and the embedded shading material/gridlines are very nice. I know we build a lot of glass boxes in greater boston, and I'm getting tired of it with many others on this forum, but I've yet to see glass just like this - perhaps some proof that it's still possible to diversify within this medium.
 
^ Nice photos, as always, Beeline. I just wanted to comment that I walk by this frequently and am highly impressed with the choice of glass. The black trim, the choice of tint, and the embedded shading material/gridlines are very nice. I know we build a lot of glass boxes in greater boston, and I'm getting tired of it with many others on this forum, but I've yet to see glass just like this - perhaps some proof that it's still possible to diversify within this medium.

Good design is good design whether its in glass or brick or clapboards. Wilson ain't no slouches. Good people doing good work there.

cca
 
Good design is good design whether its in glass or brick or clapboards. Wilson ain't no slouches. Good people doing good work there.

cca

CCA -- students class of 2074 [my hundredth reunion :(] will still be looking at it and commenting -- I think the design is a modern timeless
 
I'd like nano a lot better if building 13 was also replaced or just removed altogether.

Building 13 is as if they built the brutalist Boston City Hall attached to the side of Faneuil Hall
 
I'd like nano a lot better if building 13 was also replaced or just removed altogether.

Building 13 is as if they built the brutalist Boston City Hall attached to the side of Faneuil Hall

Building 13 -- was built as a modern addition to the Infinite Corridor model -- ex the stone on the exterior Bldg 13 -- just like the neoclassical MacLaurin Bldgs [just celebrating their 100th birthday] is just a massive poured in place concrete box with lots of ideal space for labs surrounded by corridors and offices on the exterior walls

That's one building built to last -- it will celebrate its 100th in 2065 and few changes are expected between now and then except for a plan to excavate a full basement for more quiet space for uber instrumentation
 
Building 13 -- was built as a modern addition to the Infinite Corridor model -- ex the stone on the exterior Bldg 13 -- just like the neoclassical MacLaurin Bldgs [just celebrating their 100th birthday] is just a massive poured in place concrete box with lots of ideal space for labs surrounded by corridors and offices on the exterior walls

That's one building built to last -- it will celebrate its 100th in 2065 and few changes are expected between now and then except for a plan to excavate a full basement for more quiet space for uber instrumentation

And here it is... The iconic dome peaking up above. With its... Grand entrance... Oh wait that is on the other side.

Bush_Building.jpg
 
And here it is... The iconic dome peaking up above. With its... Grand entrance... Oh wait that is on the other side.

Bush_Building.jpg

Tangent -- If you read what the Faculty Committee under Jerome Slater [Physics and Materials Science] said about the proposed building in the late 1950's when it was first discussed -- the rhetoric was very similar to what is being said about SoMa today

Bldg 13 was going to be the Northern Gateway to MIT-- hence the massive columns at the ground level; the big empty lobby and the top of the building being free of mechanicals to keep from blocking the view of the dome.

Didn't quite work out the way it was initially planned. For instance there were originally supposed to be 2 huge escalators taking you to the main Bldg 10 lobby -- instead after discussion of escalators, elevators and basements by the faculty -- the result was a quite secondary almost hidden stairs and the elevators
 
^So cool... awaiting the tangent onslaught, but definitely was worth posting. I didn't know MIT had a nuclear fission lab (is that the same as having a nuclear reactor?).
 

Back
Top