stick n move
Superstar
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2009
- Messages
- 12,096
- Reaction score
- 18,877
I'm glad they didn't go with Figure 4-9, as that would be inappropriate for a corridor with such low bus service demand. I'm hoping, but not optimistic, that the "protected bike lane" is actually protected, by at least bollards.
I'm not sure about that. In my opinion either the median needs to be wide enough that people actually want to be there (I would argue 10' is not nearly wide enough for that), or you keep the median small and use it to add some tree cover.No matter how much they pretty it up, it still looks like an overly wide highway. A 10' wide landscaped median down the middle would break up the sea of asphalt and provide a refuge in the middle for pedestrians and.bikes crossing the highway.
Yes, I think a 25' wide median that would include the green two-way bike path plus trees and landscaping would be great, something like a modified version of Comm Ave in the back Bay..I'm not sure about that. In my opinion either the median needs to be wide enough that people actually want to be there (I would argue 10' is not nearly wide enough for that), or you keep the median small and use it to add some tree cover.
Generally all the renders and layouts look like an expressway.Whoever designed Figure 4-3 must be aware of children in a mere theoretical sense, or has never visited Neponset Circle at all.
A heavily peopled bike trail adjacent to a rotary that often hurls Hyundais like a jai lai cesta! The designer must be publicly pro-life but covertly pro-death, opting to passively terminate these notional children in bike trailers in the 12th trimester and beyond. Dogs? The elderly in wheelchairs? Shades of Death Race 2000.
Oops! Your virtue signaling fell in my reality, and it smells like rotten scallops from a 1963 MDC/ MassDOT clambake.