stick n move
Superstar
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2009
- Messages
- 13,361
- Reaction score
- 23,942
I'm glad they didn't go with Figure 4-9, as that would be inappropriate for a corridor with such low bus service demand. I'm hoping, but not optimistic, that the "protected bike lane" is actually protected, by at least bollards.
www.dotnews.com
I'm not sure about that. In my opinion either the median needs to be wide enough that people actually want to be there (I would argue 10' is not nearly wide enough for that), or you keep the median small and use it to add some tree cover.No matter how much they pretty it up, it still looks like an overly wide highway. A 10' wide landscaped median down the middle would break up the sea of asphalt and provide a refuge in the middle for pedestrians and.bikes crossing the highway.
Yes, I think a 25' wide median that would include the green two-way bike path plus trees and landscaping would be great, something like a modified version of Comm Ave in the back Bay..I'm not sure about that. In my opinion either the median needs to be wide enough that people actually want to be there (I would argue 10' is not nearly wide enough for that), or you keep the median small and use it to add some tree cover.
Generally all the renders and layouts look like an expressway.Whoever designed Figure 4-3 must be aware of children in a mere theoretical sense, or has never visited Neponset Circle at all.
A heavily peopled bike trail adjacent to a rotary that often hurls Hyundais like a jai lai cesta! The designer must be publicly pro-life but covertly pro-death, opting to passively terminate these notional children in bike trailers in the 12th trimester and beyond. Dogs? The elderly in wheelchairs? Shades of Death Race 2000.
Oops! Your virtue signaling fell in my reality, and it smells like rotten scallops from a 1963 MDC/ MassDOT clambake.
www.dotnews.com
"No bridge! We want a beach now!" oh boy....."Dorchester resident John Wixted argued that Morrissey Boulevard functions largely as a commuter funnel rather than a local road, citing estimates that 75 to 85 percent of traffic consists of through traffic heading to Interstate 93.
“Instead of spending hundreds of millions of dollars raising a road that keeps flooding, why not move that commuter traffic onto I-93 where it belongs?” Wixted said".
![]()
Two options floated to replace key Morrissey drawbridge - Dorchester Reporter
State transportation officials on Tuesday laid out early design options for replacing the nearly century-old Beades Bridge on Morrissey Boulevard, drawing pointed questions from residents about cost, climate resilience, traffic disruption, environmental contamination and whether the bridge...www.dotnews.com
I agree that Morrisey Blvd has basically been just a commuter highway for at least the last 80 years. I'd rather see it downsized to a local road, and the resultant shortfall in commuter capacity mitigated by the double-tracking of the commuter rail through Dorchester and Quincy."No bridge! We want a beach now!" oh boy.....
Every highway removal sounds crazy until it's done and then people question why it wasn't done sooner. Too many lanes of roadway on too much of our limited waterfront."No bridge! We want a beach now!" oh boy.....
Oh boy what a good idea that is."No bridge! We want a beach now!" oh boy.....
I've always thought that if they removed the direct NB off ramp from 93, that would encourage some drivers with non-local destinations to stay on the highway, at least until the K-Circle/Columbia Rd exit. If they really want to take Morrissey to get to UMASS or BC High, etc. they could get off at the Freeport St exit just prior. Sometimes that couple mins of added time is enough to nudge people to stay course. To the point someone made about the project coordination, a suggestion like mine doesn't work (especially politically) if you can't explain how you would 'fix' K-Circle to accommodate more traffic or account for other changes in the area in general.So much of Morrissey north of Freeport is simply people cutting through Dorchester and Southie to bypass 93. Like usual, it makes everything worse for the people who don't do that since it ties up Kosciuszko Circle and then just injects traffic at later, more choked points. Should be easy to merge all of Morrissey into 93 at Freeport, with the north end beyond the bridge slimmed down extensively to just be local access. Hell, then you could nuke the limited access stretch between the Circle and UMass which would improve things further.
Unfortunately, the time to eliminate Morrissey as a commuter route was 25 years ago, before the Seaport was built out. Now, it's become a main line for South Shore people who work in the Seaport. Even on weekends, people going to the Seaport use Morrissey rather than 93. I shudder to think about what happens if you FORCE all those Seaport workers onto 93.