Northeastern eyes dorms

No words can describe this monstrosity. (well, actually, that's one)

For bigger shots, click here.

2429426958_680a39b2c1.jpg


2429435356_c30f9533aa.jpg


2429436550_3b18cfc7db.jpg


2429437668_b98dc59fe1.jpg


2428626597_42bd8e5a48.jpg


2429439918_1998a57554.jpg


2429441218_ec17f60e9b.jpg


2428629837_d3610b57b5.jpg


2429443412_fac55854dd.jpg


2428633423_15f834c0a4.jpg


2428634609_ccba9f74c5.jpg


2429448050_9836c40afe.jpg


2428636653_047439e405.jpg


2429450212_fafbc6dedf.jpg


2428638955_ee4781e4b6.jpg


2428640115_d960460b85.jpg


2428641237_0439e1be27.jpg


2428642257_77dff9d47f.jpg


2428643331_ebcc308791.jpg


2428644311_eda5fea5ae.jpg


2428645271_21cd8c608b.jpg


And the projects across the street, just for comparison.

2429444688_2eb1bd38c8.jpg
 
The old housing project is an infinitely better design than the new Northeastern dorms. The housing project has a human scale, the buildings and open spaces are well placed, and the brick and stone is well detailed and crafted. In contrast, the dorms are huge looming concrete paneled monoliths that are cheap and dehumanizing.

I'm thinking Northeastern put up these crappy, Soviet looking dorms in that neighborhood because it is a marginal area with a weak NIMBY factor. After all, people in public housing projects historically have not had much political or economic clout. So, Northeastern deliberately located there this ill designed, cheap crap.
 
I think a more likely scenario was the deadline set to develop the site by the city required a half ass design with short construction lead times. I couldn't help noticing that the highest point of steel was topped off very quickly outside of a normal assembly sequence.

NU needed to develop that land by a certain date in 2008 to avoid losing the parcel, they needed dormitory and classroom space per agreements with the city, and as part of their self promotion program to improve US News and World Report rankings, etc. Metrics and necessities look to have outweighed aesthetics on an especially short schedule on this jumble of boxes.

To be honest I've lived in barracks in the USSR that looked better than this.
 
Wow, VanS's shots clarified a lot: I still have no problems with the massing or the design, but the quality of those materials...there is no redemption. None.

I do have to say, though, that I wish NEstern had taken a more unabashedly urban direction in some of its older projects. Just looking at this shot, I imagine being on the UMass Amherst campus rather than in Boston:

2429435356_c30f9533aa.jpg
 
^ Boy there's no mistaking where Northeastern's property ends in that pic! The grassy area is practically begging for a moat.
 
Has anyone tried contacting Northeastern (PR Dept.?) to see if this red/brown fugliness was planned or if the University is going to do anything about the inferior panels that hsve been installed?

I'll try to contact them tomorrow.
 
I'm a student in the College of Engineering @ NU (Civil/Environmental Engineering major) and I've heard a lot about Parcel 18 and other projects going up in the city. I'll try to speak with someone that knows what's going on, and I won't hesitate to share with them the opinions of most of you on this forum.

IMO, I doubt NU would let Parcel 18 become a lumpy pile of $hit eye-soar. In fact, every other student I've spoken to here is excited for the new dorms, and frankly we're a little jealous about missing the chance our sophomore year to live there (I'll be a middler by the time it's finished). The Project Manager for NU said that the dorm likely meets LEED gold certification and that they're going the extra effort to earn silver certification.
 
The Project Manager for NU said that the dorm likely meets LEED gold certification and that they're going the extra effort to earn silver certification.

FYI. The gold certification is more difficult to get than the silver. The highest LEED Certification is Platinum. And to get that many points the building would probably need a green roof.
 
I would never want to live in this dorm, however, the building looks much better in person than it does in the photos. I park near there every Tuesday.

I'm just curious. With the development of NEU almost completely surrounding the projects, has there ever been any talks of NEU buying the projects from the city or state or whoever owns them?
 
FYI. The gold certification is more difficult to get than the silver. The highest LEED Certification is Platinum. And to get that many points the building would probably need a green roof.

My mistake... other way around. It meets silver and is aiming for gold. It's not just a green roof they'll need (which I hear it will have, btw). To get gold, things like the toilets, plumbing, A/C, carpeting, paints, etc. have to be taken into consideration. And it would probably be more than a year or two before they could even earn that certification, because of how the process works.
 
These were taken between the 9th and 11th while I was driving (good ol' drive by shootings!)

img6697ls8.jpg


img6699kf5.jpg


img6357ar4.jpg


img6358ye7.jpg


img6365gn1.jpg


img6662vm1.jpg


img6558kv6.jpg


img6560kw8.jpg


cloudy

img6561ds8.jpg


sunny

img6798zw0.jpg


img6562hw9.jpg


img6563ze9.jpg
 
What does everyone want, more of the postmodern brick Boston crap? There is no question that the precast color choice was poor, but here is a great architectural firm doing cutting edge architecture (esp. for Boston). The massing is very successful and it will be a good, sustainable building. No need to get overly pessimistic, and if you think that this is "Soviet era" architecture, then you have no clue what architecture is.
 
It feels very '70s to me. At least from the pictures, it seems like they didn't want to invest in any kind of architectural detail. The colored panels next to each window just look cheesy. I'm not an architect, but as a lay-person I think they could have done much better.
 

Back
Top