Flat awful. There is nowhere near enough good in the Lego-set massing to offset not just the terrible and mismatched color but also the crappy materials, the '86 Hyundai panel fit, and the general air of "I was built on a tight budget." What, exactly, is cutting edge here? The pop-outs and pop-ins? The window spacing? The use of cheesy precast for the only surface detailing? Every element has been done a thousand times before, more effectively ... this is reactionary modernism, a backward-looking attempt to return to the era when you needed to "get it" to appreciate it. '70s feel indeed.
This might be forgiveable, if unwelcome, on the edges of Harvard, but here it's horrifying in context. This area begs for not just density but also some visual spark and lightness - architecture that surprises and invites up-close inspection of details, not massing best appreciated from a (presumably locked) car at 30 miles per hour. So yes, I'd much, much rather have seen some elements of PoMo frippery or neo-Georgian or neo-Gothic campus or almost anything other than this on Columbus Avenue.
Are the neighbors supposed to enjoy a wink and nudge "aha" because Northeastern threw up what appears to be a massive homage to the architecture of mid-century housing projects on the edge of Roxbury? When the "friendly" and far more expensive-looking new buildings are on the rich side of the campus? And if it looks this bad now, wait until it ages. Methunion Manor-as-dorm.