Northeastern eyes dorms

Despite its pretenses, Boston is pretty much a Dunkin' Donuts sort of town. As I've said before, take away the colleges, universities, hospitals and museums, Boston would be Detroit, still dreaming of a resurgence in the manufacturing sector.
 
So what you are saying is that if you took out everything that makes Boston great, out of Boston, Boston wouldn't be great.

Fascinating.
 
Thank you, statler; you beat me to the punch there...

Tom, you would also have to take away the legal and financial industries...which are no small "industries" here. Also, I'm not sure I would qualify the demographics on Newbury or Hanover or Tremont in the South End as a Dunkin Donuts demographic.
 
statler, what I am saying is that the City of Boston and the NIMBY's do not value these institutions. They see them as tax exempt freeloaders that do not contribute to the city anything other than drunk undergraduates.
 
Sarcasm excused LOL!

ledjes, if it were not for the academic sector in Boston, the financial and legal sectors would likely be much smaller too.
 
While there might be some truth to that expression, almost every city has a unique aspect to it that makes it successful. If you took away the harbor, New York never would have emerged to be what it is today. Take away the 330 days of sunshine and Los Angeles (and most of California for that matter) would be like Wyoming and New Mexico. Washington, DC, without the federal government, is a swamp along a river.

I get what you're saying, but we really need to retire that expression. Most cities are only a few steps away from being Detroit. Likewise, most cities (when you strip away the Yuppie veneer) are "Dunkin Donuts" types of towns. The ones that aren't like Detroit are the way they are because they DO have unique, hard-to-move industries. Like, say, education or healthcare that contribute to the city's overall well-being and functionality.

Again, I understand what you're saying, but it's hardly a trait unique to Boston. At the end of the day, a failure to adapt to changing realities means we're all only a short jump from being Detroit.

And yes, that last sentence is equally applicable to NIMBYs as well. Nothing should be taken for granted and expected to endure.
 
Besides, Canada's drinking age is 18 and my buddy from Montreal and he took me up there one weekend, and there wasn't an entire balston of young Quebecers drinking themselves up into a sulfur. It was actually the American kids who couldn't handle their booze and were laughed out of Jazz Fest. Wasn't us though.

Actually, canada doesnt have an age, it's based on province. 18, 19 and yes, even 21.

Thats how it used to be in america.



The article did surprise me, I didn't realize so many people applied to Northeastern.
 
erikyow; I agree with you. I am just tired of Boston and many Bostonians treating colleges and universities as a liability to the city. When it was rumored that Suffolk University might take over the Filene's hole there was outrage expressed. "Why are we allowing these schools to take over our city?" If Northeastern were to announce a 1000 student increase in enrolment, there would be more outrage. And if Northeastern proposed building a dorm to house them, even more. BU has completed building NEIDL in the South End and it sits empty because people are afraid of the work that will be done there. No amount of assurances and safeguards will convince them that the whole city won't die from ebola if it opens.

That was my vent!
 
Despite its pretenses, Boston is pretty much a Dunkin' Donuts sort of town.

Thank god Cambridge / Somerville aren't (completely). There might even be a bar without a big screen TV showing The Game somewhere on Boston's Left Bank.

When I take Europeans around Boston, their first comments are "but I thought it was a student / liberal city. I thought it would be bursting with youthful energy everywhere and fun!" They usually find what they're looking for across the river, but wonder how it wound up in what they'd consider a suburb.
 
^^ I'm all for making Boston more lively and less puritan, but what were they expecting Woodstock on the Commons everyday? How is Central Sq not urban?
 
Thank god Cambridge / Somerville aren't (completely). There might even be a bar without a big screen TV showing The Game somewhere on Boston's Left Bank.

When I take Europeans around Boston, their first comments are "but I thought it was a student / liberal city. I thought it would be bursting with youthful energy everywhere and fun!" They usually find what they're looking for across the river, but wonder how it wound up in what they'd consider a suburb.

I'm not sure what's surprising about this. Harvard and Tufts students don't cross the river, MIT students do but they don't go out, BU/BC/NEU students live in student ghettos.

Emerson may in fact be our only true NYU equivalent (and possibly Suffolk).
 
^^ Berklee holds down Mass ave X Boylston, often with a guy or two wailing on their sax.
 
Thank god Cambridge / Somerville aren't (completely). There might even be a bar without a big screen TV showing The Game somewhere on Boston's Left Bank.

When I take Europeans around Boston, their first comments are "but I thought it was a student / liberal city. I thought it would be bursting with youthful energy everywhere and fun!" They usually find what they're looking for across the river, but wonder how it wound up in what they'd consider a suburb.

I'm not sure Europeans are the paradigm by which we should judge our youthful energy. I've been to more sterile urban environments in Europe than in the US. Boston is hands down above these cities (mainly Northern European ones).

On a side note, I've been pleasantly impressed by recent trips to Harvard/Brighton in Allston. The hipster central mentality is starting to mix with a more cheap, Asian/Indian culinary vibe. There is even a Polish pizza joint.

And by the way, Cambridge has always been more left leaning than Boston. This is old news.
 
It's unfortunately not going to happen. This area of Boston is filled with long-time Bostonians who absolutely don't want this "hipper urban environment" to occur. It was a struggle equal to the grade of Mission Hill (clever way of saying really uphill) to even get dorms built. Boston is supposedly "America's College Town," but they don't want more student life anywhere in this city.

I'm not sure I quite buy this. The area already has a ton of "student" businesses along Huntington, Mass Ave, Boylston, etc. They're just fairly bland/chain/uncharming/without edge. Given that student businesses are here, it's not as if locals are actively against hipper businesses, I think the middling reputation of the largest school in the area has just not put much pressure on the business community to appeal to a more sophisticated crowd. If there were a consumer base of more cosmopolitan, literary, discerning students (and I think NEU may be growing that demographic) business would come along to meet that clientele. Concert goers would have places to eat and drink before and after symphony and NEC/Berklee/BC events.
 
Thank god Cambridge / Somerville aren't (completely). There might even be a bar without a big screen TV showing The Game somewhere on Boston's Left Bank.

That would be the Burren in Davis Square. No TVs.
 
Despite its pretenses, Boston is pretty much a Dunkin' Donuts sort of town. As I've said before, take away the colleges, universities, hospitals and museums, Boston would be Detroit, still dreaming of a resurgence in the manufacturing sector.

Move Miami to Minnesota and it's Detroit. Take Casinos out of Las Vegas and it's Detroit. What you are saying is take most of the main job producers in the city out, of course the city would be crap.
 
A couple shots at what currently exists

IMG_1481.jpg


I was kindly escorted off this garage, luckily after I got all the shots I wanted :)

IMG_1523.jpg
 

Back
Top