dshoost88
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2008
- Messages
- 2,158
- Reaction score
- 2,510
I was on foot, and the only traffic on downtown streets were cyclists.You're lucky you survived.
I was on foot, and the only traffic on downtown streets were cyclists.You're lucky you survived.
It has begun..
Might I remind you of the recent renovation of 375 Pearl in NYC? its the other way around, and is spectacularly half arsed - there's probably a reason a significant number of its tenants are city agencies. (at least compared to the original 2008 pre-Great Recession renders)That's quite a contrast on the glass..
I was thinking the other day of how ridiculous this thing is gonna look halfway through construction.. There may be a small/short phase where the bottom half is buttoned up in a modern curtain wall while the top half remains with the older facade. On-lookers, passerbys, and tourists are gonna scratch their heads.
That is interesting, I would guess that they are getting their fire rating from enclosing with gyp board. I dont know the code off hand.The frame doesn't look like it was sprayed with fire proofing. Will it be?
Does this thing have a tenant ?
JLL, who owns the building, is also a tenant, and will be in place through the renovation. I have not heard of them landing any new leases yet.No idea, but I know the law firm Sullivan & Worcester was in the building pre-reno.
Goody -- its essentially 1 M sq ft of brand-new state-of-the-art [at least pre-Pandemic] Office space in the most desirable part of the Boston Traditional Financial District -- that's pretty good positioning [or it would have been if they had delivered it 3 months ago at least]JLL, who owns the building, is also a tenant, and will be in place through the renovation. I have not heard of them landing any new leases yet.
I think the old façade was fine too. This is a colossal waste of money and materials.Seems odd they would start installing glass on the bottom before the upper floors demolition was completed. I may be in the minority but I thought the old facade looked fine.
You guys are missing the point... the building owner could give a rats ass what it looks like on the exterior from the street.
Finally, we have no idea what the lifetime was on the original facade but there may have been problems with it that necessitated replacement or it was simply reaching its life expectancy.