odurandina
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2015
- Messages
- 5,328
- Reaction score
- 265
Pardon all. We're seeing the design vs a (once in 2 generations) opportunity incites much emotion and passion! i thought there were so many great points/counter points made, and then the discussion get disproportionately sideways. i cringe at the notion this could be a polarizing design.
104% "We're building skyscrapers..." In what city do neighbors living in highrises have veto power
over other highrises?
Let's not do this.
We sure do get the cheap knockoffs of things done so amazingly well elsewhere. The Original (>800' w/ spire) SST design could have been our 181 Fremont. They weren't able to program anything whatsoever into either of the Hub Towers.
--and pissed off the neighbors.They've addressed resiliency.
This is a serious PNF, about 550 pages longer than the ENF filed for the first design.
________________
re: the 2014 iteration. It was a non-starter because it failed to meet Chapter 91.
Maybe this was designed by the KPF team that did Hudson Yards and looked past 30 Hudson Yards to the SOM-designed Equinox Hotel next door. It has very similar setbacks. It looks like a limestone-type cladding, I like it a lot. At least it is not another glass box.
Given that Walsh is the mayor, do we think this has a chance of being approved?
104% "We're building skyscrapers..." In what city do neighbors living in highrises have veto power
over other highrises?
That might be the worst thing you can say about someone in Boston.Sounds like someone lives in the Harbor Towers....
Let's not do this.
Chunky, hulking, awful proportions, imposing, does nothing to improve access to the waterfront, looks air-lifted out of South Florida. Keep the garage and let's wait until the next real estate cycle. This thing is a monstrosity .....an ugly building with very few redeeming qualities. 2014 proposal was very nice, this one is not. Boston can afford to be picky and wait for a design that's worthy of this site.
Swing and a big miss, it's almost comical how leading firms seem to just phone in their Boston designs. They must anticipate the conventional, provincial mindset here and respond accordingly—
....an obese throwback 1920s NY tower with setbacks on steroids.
We sure do get the cheap knockoffs of things done so amazingly well elsewhere. The Original (>800' w/ spire) SST design could have been our 181 Fremont. They weren't able to program anything whatsoever into either of the Hub Towers.