Portland, ME - New Construction Continued

Thanks! that would be great! I am fascinated with the history of how Portland developed and continues to grow. Sure, I like cities in general, but Portland is unique in my mind. As you mentioned, you can't measure a place by statistics very easily, but occasionally they are accurate in their depiction of "urbanity." Burlington, VT has 38,000 people, over 10,000 students August through May, and a nearby suburb, winooski, add another 6,000 people with an area of only one square mile (densest town in VT). Also, the land area I just mentioned is 11 square miles total, with approximately 54,000 people. Portland, by contrast, has twice as much land area, and only 9,000 more people. But, if you go beyond Portland's city proper core, the suburban metro area extends for much farther than Burlington's, and I think this explains why there is a TON more going on in Portland than in Burlington. I went to college in Burlington. When I was there, the town revitalized the winooski mills into a mixed use new urbanist village with condos and shops, and built an aquarium as well as a new parking garage, and a 10 story condo building on the lake and a new hotel. The town was booming, like many other areas at that time. The tallest buildings ever proposed for burlington were twin 16 story residential towers, which were overwhelmingly rejected by residents. There is currently a proposal to build a 10 story building on college street, but it hasn't seemed to get off the "drawing board" yet. and nearby south burlington is trying to create a master plan to make it have a "downtown"

that's all my knowledge on VT stuff. I have a lot on Portland, too, but I am sure it is mostly stuff you already know.

Lastly, I must say to anyone who has not yet been, that the newly renovated Portland Public Library is a MUST SEE. very open concept and new. nice. I was in there looking for the article you mentioned from 1966 on the 20 story building for monument square, which I retrieved, and I was in there again today. On the second floor reading room there is currently a giant collection of poster sized aerial photographs of portland from historical portland press herald photos. one of them shows one monument square under construction, and some others show the city before it had a real skyline. I highly recommend it, since it won't be a permanent collection on display. In the basement level, there are numerous poster sized architectural renderings of the various stages of design that the library had. Very nice as well.

I would LOVE to see the architectural plans for the fidelity addition sometime. We should definitely make plans.
 
Oh, and I should add that I am not good at maintaining newspaper clippings physically. That's what I use this website for. Its digital storage. The few clippings I have retained have become litter in the back of my car or have gotten lost or damaged over time. Until recently, we have been too mobile residentially speaking for me to get organized.

Oh, and another piece of trivia/info about Portland is that in 2006 a developer from Scarborough, Kerry Anderson, wanted to develop those big lots around Brian Boru's you were groaning about earlier. He wanted to build a 12 story and a 7 story building on the parcel Boru's is on, and potentially some larger projects across the street. I spoke with a representative of his company who said the plans fell apart when the economy began to sink.

I wonder if an addition to the fidelity building similar to the one originally planned would still be feasible in the amount of space that currently exists in between that building and the former public market (the new power pay office headquarters). It is currently a waste of space with only an atm drive-thru on it, but I don't know what size footprint a new high rise would require there.

are you familiar with the pearl street mid rise planned for pearl and fore in the 1980s? pretty nice building in my opinion. there is a picture of it on the portland renderings thread.
 
okay one last thing. Are you familiar with the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat? CTBUH is a worldwide organization headquartered in Chicago that promotes knowledge of skyscrapers by encouraging sharing and dissemination of best practices and current trends in the building industry. I think the website is ctbuh.org or something, and if you click on the "publications" tab it brings you to an online list of quarterly CTBUH journals, which can also be purchased in print. These are tremendous resources and a very interesting read for anyone interested in this stuff.
 
Was aware of the 7 story building he wanted to put at the corner of Center and Fore, but not a 12 story one. The Fidelity Building 15 story addition was actually going to be called 100 Monument Square and I think the footprint would have infringed on the entrance to Power Pay's new offices. You'll be able to figure it out after you check out the plans. Sure would have been close if not!
 
Man would that have been nice! I always thought the best use of the power pay building would be as an entry lobby which connected to a new high rise in the place we are discussing. Given that it has a parking garage attached, why not? Oh well.

Oh, yes there were plans for a 12 story as well by Anderson. http://www.thebollard.com/bollard/?p=2652

the Graves Hill project, now canceled I believe, was originally supposed to be two 14 story buildings, before it was scaled down to two 9 story buildings, and now it is defunct. oh well.
 
IAM stil thinking that MR. Otlander and Mr. Patrik and Mr. Shabat shuld NOT being excited about putting the SHORT FATTYS in Portland peeples syline. It look BETTER withoutsthem. AND. not gobblerling up block with UGGLY. Portland being the NICE place. You will Make it look like B UTLINGTON MALL if put in all this things and WIPEOUT olds bildings.
 
I don't think anyone is advocating further destruction of old buildings in Portland or anywhere else these days. We are hoping to infill existing urban lots of wasted space. Did you understand what I just wrote? I can't translate it.
 
Portland's Congress Square: Upgrade or unload?
PORTLAND ? The city is exploring options for the Congress Square park at Congress and High streets, including redesign or sale of the property.

The Congress Square Redesign Study Group, made up of local business and neighborhood representatives and city officials, is planning a public forum next month to gather input on what the community would like to see happen with the park.

Officials and business leaders have decided the space needs a rebirth.

"Not for lack of trying, it is a failed space," said city Historic Preservation Manager Deb Andrews, who is staffing the group.

Portland Downtown District Director Jan Beitzer said the district has been eyeing redesign of the sunken, bricked park for several years. The study group will use a $50,000 grant from the city to conduct initial planning and then hire an outside consultant.

"It's a gateway to downtown," Beitzer said. "Twenty-two thousand vehicles go through the corner (a day). It does not serve as the iconic gateway to the Arts District that we'd like to see."

The group met last week at the Eastland Park Hotel to hear about the history of the property from Andrews. The next step is to gather public comment.

"There are a number of things that can be done with that area," said Penny Littell, the city's director of Planning and Urban Development. "We can redesign it with a building or a park."

While Littell cautioned that a decision about the park is far from being made, one option is to sell part or all of the property, which totals about a third of an acre.

Congress Square underwent a dramatic transformation in the late 1970s, Andrews said, using an urban design grant.

Until the 1940s, residential buildings with storefronts filled the space. Those buildings were cleared and replaced with a commercial block that for a time was occupied by a Walgreens pharmacy and later a Dunkin' Donuts shop.

In 1979, the Dunkin' Donuts building was demolished the city took ownership of the parcel, and turned it into the park that exists today.

As part of that same urban design grant program, Andrews said, the historic Hay Building across Congress Street was restored and the Payson Wing was built at the Portland Museum of Art. The Eastland Park Hotel on High Street was also rehabilitated.

The park was meant to serve as a connection between the Eastland and the museum, said Andrews. It is home to the clock from the old Union Station that was on St. John Street and has some seating and a stage. Andrews said efforts to create programming at the park have failed.

"It's underutilized," Beitzer said. "It needs to be refreshed."

It could be redesigned to support a sculpture, she said, or to be a space for temporary art.

Besides the downtown district, representatives from the Eastland, the museum, the Bayside and Parkside neighborhoods, Greater Portland Landmarks and a couple of local architects are members of the study group. City Councilors David Marshall and Kevin Donoghue are co-chairmen.

The public forum is scheduled for May 12 from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. at the Eastland Park Hotel, 157 High St.

Portland Planning Board OKs Old Port hotel, North Deering bank
PORTLAND ? The Planning Board on Tuesday unanimously approved a new hotel development for the former Jordan's Meat property in the Old Port.

Developer Mark Woglom, president of New Hampshire-based Opechee Construction Corp, said interior demolition has already begun at the 207-209 block on Fore Street and expects the former hot dog factory will be completely removed within the next few weeks.

Woglom has formed a new company, Old Port Hospitality, for the project. He said sidewalks around the property ? which is bounded by Fore, India and Middle streets and Franklin Arterial ? are expected to remain open throughout construction, except during certain phases of the demolition.

The site is being cleared to make way for a six-story, 122-room Hampton Inn that will also have a 7,000-square-foot Sebago Brewing Co. restaurant with outdoor cafe-style seating and 12 top-floor residential condominiums. The project is expected to be completed as soon as next summer.

The building plan approved by the board for the 1.75-acre site has been updated since it was first introduced March 9. Windows have been added to a secondary entrance and stairway for hotel patrons and residents on Market Street, and a Franklin Arterial-facing wall has been made more pedestrian friendly.

During the public hearing, resident Markos Miller, a member of the Franklin Arterial Committee, complimented the changes, but suggested the city go further and explore narrowing the Franklin-Fore Street intersection and expanding sidewalks.

"There's a lot of road there that is not being used," said Miller, who also convinced Woglom to agree to preserve the Jordan's Meat sign.

But resident Robert Haines criticized the parking plan, which would provide about 90 surface-level spaces for hotel guests and condo residents, but none for restaurant patrons.

Instead of providing the necessary parking, the developer agreed to give the city $50,000 to expand and improve on-street parking opportunities, mostly along Franklin Arterial. The Ocean Gateway parking garage could also be utilized, Woglom said.

Representatives of the state's unionized iron workers and laborers spoke in support of the project, calling on the developer to hire local workers at with competitive wages and benefits.

John Evans, a representative of unionize iron workers, said "I think the city of Portland needs this ? the state of Maine needs this. I hope to have the opportunity to build this hotel."

However, Haines contended the plan "bordered on illegality," since the necessary code changes that would allow that arrangement, though narrowly approved by the Planning Board, have not been approved by the City Council.

"The parking for this stinks," Haines said. "It stinks like a load of fish that didn't get unloaded in time."

Although planning administrators said the board had authority over parking issues, board members agreed with Haines and required the developer's to secure at least 10 parking spaces, by lease or purchase, in a nearby parking garage.

"Although we can stretch the language, I'm a little uncomfortable doing it," board Chairman Bill Hall said.

Since Woglom intends to further develop the India Street and Middle Street sides of the lot, the board granted waivers requiring brick sidewalks on Middle Street and reduced the landscaping for the surface parking lot.

If the second phase of development does not move forward in two to four years, the developer will pay to replace the asphalt sidewalk with brick and improve the landscaping to meet city standards.

"This is a good project," board member David Silk said. "These are little things that over time make the big difference."

Regional transit agency hopes to boost profile, funding with video production

PORTLAND ? The Portland Area Comprehensive Transportation System has created an eight-minute video to educate the public and, in the process, drum up support for underfunded projects.

As a federally funded program, PACTS cannot actively lobby state or federal officials for more funding. While the video presents viewers with the funding problem and asks them to get involved by contacting elected officials, it does not explicitly advocate for any specific piece of legislation.

PACTS Executive Director John Duncan said the video was sanctioned by administrators of state and federal transportation programs.

"We're walking a fine line," Duncan said. "We have to be careful about how we say things."

The video opens with the message: "A vital resource needs our help."

The first half of the production introduces to viewers to PACTS, which coordinates regional transportation plans and distributes federal and state funding for transportation projects to 15 communities from Biddeford to Freeport.

About half-way through, however, the otherwise upbeat background music turns into a somber, solitary piano melody, which is overlaid with images of rusty bridge joints, pot hole-pocked roads and crumbling concrete.

The narrator says state infrastructure needs $500 million in maintenance and upgrades over the next 10 years, but the current funding formula will only produce $250 million.

At that point, the music grows more ominous, followed by a closeup of the hole that appeared last spring in the Veteran's Memorial Bridge, which carries 23,000 vehicles daily between Portland and South Portland.

"What you're looking at is a gaping hole in the Veteran's Bridge," the narrators says. "This hole reflects the conditions that many of the roads and bridges are in throughout our state."

The video does not mention that the bridge is scheduled for a $63 million replacement by 2012.

The narrator then says the average age of buses in the region's fleet is 14 years, "well past their economic and environmentally useful life." Meanwhile, ridership on Portland's METRO has increased 23 percent since 1999.

The message ? and music ? turns more hopeful at the end, with shots of the Blaine House, U.S. Capitol and and U.S. Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine.

The narrator suggests that a 5 cent-per-gallon gas tax would only cost the average driver $30 a year, while additional car repairs from driving on poor roads will cost that same driver $260 a year.

"It's pay now," he warns, "or pay a lot more later. ... Your leaders need guidance."

While some rail activists have criticized PACTS for focusing too much attention on roads, Duncan said he has largely received positive feedback about the video, which was produced by Mike McDade at Falmouth Community Television for $3,500.

Duncan said PACTS plans on producing future video spots that focus on more specific issues. In addition to YouTube, the videos are running on community television channels in PACTS service areas.

Meanwhile, PACTS has has also created a blog, which was launched when the Portland City Council voted to accept the Portland Peninsula Transportation Plan, which recommends adding a bus-only lane on Congress Street, installing better signs for parking garages and posting more "no right turn on red" signs.

"We're trying to get ourselves more in the public eye," Duncan said.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiAr4dVVFC4&feature=player_embedded#!
 
I'll take a new building over a "refurbished" park on the site. The city should sell the parcel to a developer that will build a quality project. With our two green party councilors on the study group, hopes for a new development are probably slim!

One last thought, I would develop the Congress Square site and turn the vacant "eyesore" lot between Burnham Tower and Geno's on Congress Street into a park which would be a compromise to both sides.
 
Last edited:
That's actually quite a brilliant idea. Anyone know who owns the space next to Genos?
 
I don't think anyone is advocating further destruction of old buildings in Portland or anywhere else these days. We are hoping to infill existing urban lots of wasted space. Did you understand what I just wrote? I can't translate it.

IAM havin the TRUBLE wit your fixilization withh the TALL ONES!!! andyou having the LOW standard and the BEER GOGLES for ANYTHING to get bilt in the Portland.
You obliviouslyVERY msarter person than me.
 
Portland could definitely use a new mixed use building. I hope this works out
 
Bayside Trail emerging as an urban 'oasis'
After 10 years of planning, the first mile will be completed in June, with more fundraising to follow.

portland-press-herald_2991477.jpg

Jim Gooch, Nan Cumming and Mark McAuliffe stand on a berm along a section of the new Bayside Trail, with its great view of the Portland skyline.

portland-press-herald_2991476.jpg

Two-thirds of the money has been spent to improve the drainage in the area and to remove or cover up contaminated soils with 18 inches of clean soil.

PORTLAND - The oddly shaped mounds of earth that have sprung up along the Marginal Way end of the Franklin Arterial are just the latest evidence of the transformation occurring in Portland's Bayside neighborhood.
click image to enlarge


Look closer and you'll see work crews laying bricks, and a ribbon of pavement on the abandoned railroad right-of-way between Marginal Way and Somerset Street. Those mounds will be soon be covered with grass, an ideal perch for lunch on a sunny day.

By the end of June, a mile-long trail will connect the Back Cove and Eastern Prom trails to Elm Street. By next spring -- if trail supporters can raise another $1.6 million -- this will be an urban greenway, complete with pocket parks, benches, public art, playgrounds and gardens.

After more than a decade of planning, the nearly $5 million Bayside Trail is taking shape.

Trail advocates say the project amounts to an extreme makeover for one of the most blighted urban landscapes in Maine. The end result, they hope, will be a lively urban neighborhood, a modern extension of downtown Portland. Moreover, the trail will serve as both a public gathering place and a key link in Portland Trails' network of 30-plus trails in Greater Portland.

"We are creating in the middle of Bayside this little oasis," said Mark McAuliffe, managing partner at Apothecary by Design, located near the trail on Marginal Way." If you are a business looking at this area, this is a tremendous attraction."

Some of the nearby landowners believe the trail will make their lots more attractive to developers.

The trail follows the old Union Branch railroad easement. The route -- particularly the desolate stretch in East Bayside, has had a reputation for being a high-crime area.

But that's already changing as trail workers clean up, said Doug Cardente, who owns at least six acres abutting the trail. It's going to be even safer when it's completed and lights are installed, he said

"The trail is going to be a huge benefit to the city, even if it's mildly used," he said. "It's so much better than it was before."

The city owns five developable parcels totaling about 10 acres. Before the economic downturn put a halt to some proposed projects, developers could only imagine the trail's benefits, said Alex Jaegerman, director of the city's planning division. The trail's completion will make it easier to market the area once the economy recovers, he said.

Not all public parks improve property values, cautioned Kevin Bunker, a developer who is now building housing for medical students near Maine Medical Center. One acknowledged failure, he said, is Congress Square, which the city turned into a bricked park in 1979.

"It's unused urban space that was planned with the best intentions," he said, "but it didn't work out so well."

Still, Bunker is optimistic for the Bayside Trail. He said the critical question is whether users will feel they are safe when they use it to bike or walk home at night.

The trail is being built wide enough so police cars can use it in emergencies. Also, some of the fencing will be removed and access opened up so users won't feel they are in an enclosed area, said Jim Gooch of the Trust for Public Lands, one of the project partners.

The city purchased the former railroad property in 2005 for $1.5 million. The rest of the money came from a combination of federal and state sources, including $800,000 in stimulus funds.

In the second phase of the project, the city plans to extend the trail to Deering Oaks when it rebuilds Somerset Street.

The rail yard, located west of Franklin Arterial and between Marginal Way and Somerset, was constructed in 1910 in a former swamp that was filled-in. The yard was taken out of service in the 1980s.

The mounds of earth on each side of Franklin Arterial serve dual purposes: They cap contaminated soils, and could also serve as potential ramps if the city can find $5 million to build a pedestrian bridge over Franklin Arterial.

In the meantime, trail users will have to cross the four-lane state highway at the traffic lights at Marginal Way.

Some urban designers say that a meandering trail seems more fitting for the suburbs than the city. While connecting the Eastern Prom Trail to Deering Oaks is important, the city should have built bike lanes and sidewalks and preserved the urban grid, said Mitch Rasor, a land planner based in Yarmouth.

Rasor said an urban grid creates more engaging civic spaces and allows for more efficient use of land for development.

But developing every square foot of land is not the goal, said Ron Spinella, president of the Bayside Community Development Corp.

"From an economic standpoint, it's not about getting every last inch of earth and putting a building on it," he said.

"There are other gains you can achieve by having a pedestrian infrastructure in place. Maybe I'm a dreamer. But I know I'm not alone. I'm in good company
 
I walked through the bayside trail last weekend, it's coming along nicely. It is a bit odd that the scrapyard is still there but it was there first so I guess we can continue to live with it. If anyone is interested, Portland Trails is having a volunteer orientation on Saturday April 24th from 9-12 at the East End Community School. I've helped out with them before and they are always looking for new folk.

The story about Congress Square was interesting. I was going to write a post about it on my Walk Around Portland blog but the article posted above summed the issues up nicely. I live very close to the square and walk through it all the time and it's interesting that it attracts a certain Paul's Food clientele most of the time. On First Fridays and other special events it attracts a more diverse crowd which is nice.

Note in the picture, the High St. expressway used to be a two-way road, which probably made it a more hospitable area for pedestrians.

eastlandhotel1.jpg
 
Great photo Corey! Interesting to see the competing local drug store across the street.
 
Last edited:
Project weighs pros, cons of bus or rail service from Portland
By Steve Mistler
E-mail and share
Apr 20, 2010 8:10 am

PORTLAND ? Removing 1,000 vehicles from Maine's Interstate highways will require commuter rail or rapid bus service. The question for state transportation planners is which one, and how?

Since 2008, the Maine Department of Transportation has been reviewing alternative transportation options in the Portland North Project, a study that will be used to apply for funding through the Federal Transit Administration's Small Starts program.

So far, DOT planners and local stakeholders have discussed six options, two involving bus rapid transit and four with train service.

On April 28 at 6 p.m., the DOT will hold a meeting at the University of Southern Maine's Abromsom Center about the costs, logistics and preference for each transit method, several of which include new transportation stations in Portland.

The hearing is the second of three hosted by DOT, which is gathering public input before completing a final analysis and application to the FTA, possibly by this summer.

The Portland North study has gained increased significance since the state received word in January that it had secured a $35 million grant to upgrade 30 miles of track between Portland and Brunswick. The rehabilitation project will allow Amtrak to extend Downeaster service to Freeport and Brunswick ? welcome news to those communities, which hope the Downeaster's connection to Boston will boost business and tourism.

Work on the Portland-Brunswick project is scheduled to begin this summer, which means transportation planners will soon have to decide how to carry passengers north of the Portland Transportation Center on Sewall Street, the Downeaster's northern terminus, which is well outside the city's hub of businesses and attractions.

Two existing rail lines could handle the traffic, the St. Lawrence & Atlantic Railway and the Pan Am. Both could lead to the construction of new downtown stations in Portland.

Since 2005, several studies say DOT prefers the St. Lawrence because it would be the best fit for establishing inter-city commuter service with Falmouth, Yarmouth, Freeport and Brunswick. The line, which would run along Interstate 295, could also provide direct access to Portland's Ocean Gateway terminal with a station on India Street, or the city's growing Bayside neighborhood with a station on Marginal Way.

However, the St. Lawrence option is also the most expensive, requiring either a rail corridor through Bayside or along the current narrow gauge line on the city's Eastern Promenade. Either station would also require a rail bridge over Back Cove.

DOT estimates put capital costs for the St. Lawrence link at more than $121 million to connect Brunswick and Bath, and up to $195 million to Lewiston.

The Pan Am line would cost significantly less, between $55 million and $60 million to connect to Brunswick, and about $100 million to Lewiston. However, according to DOT studies dating back to 2005, the prospect for commuter service could be hurt by the line's route and current freight traffic. However, planners believe the line is fit for passenger service, which the Downeaster could provide in the short-term.

The Pan Am proposal also includes two potential station options for in-town Portland: the resurrection of Union Station, or on Center Street. DOT mock-ups put the Center Street Station near the Marine Trade Center.

The Pan Am line would also take train riders west, along Interstate 95, before heading east to Brunswick via the Pan Am Brunswick Branch. The route shows potential stops in West Falmouth, near Maine Turnpike Exit 53, and in Cumberland. It would also require infrastructure upgrades at Yarmouth Junction.

The Yarmouth Junction project, estimated at $5 million, is included in a $58 million bond package that will be decided by voters in June. The project is also a prerequisite to establishing rail service to the Lewiston-Auburn region.

Twin Cities rail advocates have been critical of the state's focus on bringing commuter and passenger service to Brunswick and other coastal regions rather than their community, which has a larger population and, according to DOT studies, residents who are less likely to own cars.

The resurgence of rail, and its sudden ability to attract federal funds, has overshadowed discussions of a rapid bus system. Express bus proposals will be discussed on April 28.

Compared to rail, the bus plans would require significantly fewer infrastructure improvements. However, logistics along the I-295 corridor could be problematic, since express service typically requires a dedicated highway lane and DOT has no plans to widen I-295.

Instead, a some proposals have buses running in the breakdown lanes on I-295, a prospect that raises questions about where to park disabled vehicles or those pulled over by police.

DOT is also reviewing other alternatives involving dedicated bus lanes on I-95.

For more information about the Portland North Project, visit the DOT website, maine.gov/mdot/portlandnorth/
 
Maine Voices: Land use issues still unresolved
Solutions used elsewhere continue to founder on Maine's unique set of circumstances.

By JACK D. KARTEZ

PORTLAND - Most Maine households have by now returned their census surveys and we will have a new picture of our region's development.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Jack D. Kartez, Ph.D. is professor of community planning and development at USM's Edmund S. Muskie School of Public Service.

Back in 2001 the Brookings Institution -- GrowSmart Maine's partner in the Charting Maine's Future project -- produced another thought-provoking report from new Census data with giant implications for the Portland metropolitan area.

The 2001 study "Who Sprawls the Most" reported that out of all 281 metropolitan census areas, the Portland region had one of the highest ratios of land converted to urban use versus population growth.

Although we were one of the smallest areas in terms of growth in numbers of people, we were spreading out and converting the rural landscape to urban use at one of the highest and least-efficient rates.

We are all familiar with the reasons. The lack of affordable housing in developed centers of Portland and its surrounding towns, cheaper land in the outlying undeveloped areas, and our love for the Maine landscape, have all led so many of us to the reasonable decision to move out onto a couple of acres miles from town.

Maybe we are loving that landscape into oblivion -- and opinions differ sharply about that -- but a new industry-led report (from The Urban Land Institute) for the Boston region ("The Boston Regional Challenge") raises another reason for concern about spread.

Transportation costs in Boston -- which also faces sprawl -- are now so high for many outlying households that it is counteracting the benefits of lower cost housing. After housing, transportation is the next largest cost for Americans.

Having more transportation choices -- such as mass transit -- is one way to rebalance that equation. But the pattern of low-density settlement determines the fate of such efforts.

We are still far too thinly spread to jump into changes like the other Portland (Oregon's) now-fabled rail system built just a generation ago. A driver for making that rail possible was of course the heavyweight Oregon state policy requiring urban growth boundaries and separation of rural from urbanizing lands.

As a former Oregon state planner myself -- but New Englander returned home -- I can say that approaches like regional urban growth boundaries and the like are not likely to ever help us here. Why?

? Because we lack counties with unincorporated territory in which urban expansion can be negotiated with growing towns and cities.

? Because our beautiful small town lands are not heavy-production natural resource areas that support tools like exclusive farm use zoning (with true farm minimum lot sizes, not 2 acres).

? And because the New England local government structure of our beloved towns requires each to struggle for a healthy -- hopefully growing -- real estate property tax base to maintain their functions.

Of course, so does Portland, which subsidizes the region with services (the newly renovated library a case in point) but which receives no contribution from beneficiaries in outlying towns.

Regional tax-base sharing could address such issues -- it was a hot idea when I was a planning student in 1975 -- but it is not likely here anytime soon.

What are we to do, then, to sustain our unique New England character without letting it be a driver of its own destruction? Ultimately, the private market supplies housing choice, and that is where we should look.

When we see compact, affordable and centrally located new housing and community service center development -- in villages and neighborhoods or creating new ones -- there will be more choice than the one that many household are driven to now, to spread farther and farther from jobs and services.

That is the elegant, choice-maximizing route. Alas, such projects have been proposed over the past 20 years, such as Richard Berman's Exit 10 new village in Falmouth and the Chamberlain Brothers new neighborhood at Scarborough's Dunstan Corner -- only to be fought over and impaired by using land-use regulation as a tactic instead of as a tool.

Our economic downturn is the crucial time to debate how we will receive new proposals for region-saving innovations that the market will serve up again -- soon, we can hope.
 
Here's some photos of the Bayside Trail as of last weekend. Looking at all these photos posted on this forum recently of Portland long-ago, it makes me optimistic to think that maybe a bustling urban environment will grow around in Bayside, around this trail.

portlandmainespring2010.jpg

portlandmainespring2010.jpg

portlandmainespring2010.jpg


portlandmainespring2010.jpg
 
Hello All,
Thank for pictures of Bayside Trail, Corey. I too, believe the trail will spur development down the road.
I am very happy the former Jordan Meats is being developed though I cannot believe Portland can support so many hotels, condominiums, and apartments. The thing that gets me about hotels in particular in Portland is that it is such as seasonal business. I guess the free market determines these things. Again, I am happy for the development and Im sure the hotel/condominiums/restaurant will look great.
The Portland Public Library looks wonderful on the inside and I really hope Video Board becomes a reality.
Crescent Heights is coming along nicely - sorry don't own a camera.

www.crescentheightsmaine.com

Matt
 
Matt - remember that there is a real shortage of housing in Portland, and condos are not all luxury. some of them are basically just apartments that the owner invests in rather than wastes rent on. From what I understand, that's what these are. Also, there will only be 12 of them, instead of over 100 as previously planned. Moreover, there are a lot of hotels in the area, but they are not all what economists refer to as "perfect substitutes" for each other. What I mean is that if the new Hampton is full one night, the people looking for a room won't check at the Portland Harbor Hotel (a much classier venue) because that's a different price range and market. They might look at the Holiday in by the Bay, or a hotel out by the mall or in freeport instead. The idea with this hotel is to bring some of the people that would otherwise stay out by the mall and get them recreating downtown Portland.

Also, I went by Crescent Heights this morning (from the inner angle) and noticed how bad the structure looks compared to a stately brick residential unit, sitting in dilapidated condition, right next to it. But, it is an improvement over empty space I guess.

Corey, I believe I saw you walk into the library this morning, but wasn't too sure. I hope you got some pictures of those old Portland Aerials upstairs.
 

Back
Top