Well, it is difficult to forecast. for one thing, the site used to house a structure, so a new building isn't out of the picture. However, given the economy, the site would likely just sit there, and that wouldn't address the issue that has been raised. I'm not terribly convinced anything needs to be done to or with it. Sure, it would be nice, but I can think of several other lots around town that need more TLC than congress square. (2.) or the place could be raised, better landscaped, and left as is.
My prediction is that there will be study groups, a long drawn out process, and then there will be a RFP to some landscape architects, then the city will say woops we have no money and the project will become just a memory. That's how this place works. I wish they (the City) would stop spreading their resources and time and effort so thin and just focus on one area at a time until real progress can be made, then move on. Eastern waterfront/new port, Bayside, the arts district, congress square, the east end boat launch, the rain garden, east bayside, I mean c'mon every day its a new "fad" area to focus on in this city, but what happened to the areas that were trendy to focus on the day before? Lets not forget about them. Changing the focus of city efforts from one place to another isn't fooling anyone--nothing is actually being accomplished. As soon as the PPH mentions something in the news, it takes off like a new style of hairdo and you see it everywhere all over the news and blogs and peoples' discussions, which is fine, but again, what about the hot topics of yesterday/year? The civic center is a prime example. anyway, I'll be working all night so let us know how it goes if you attend, Todd. Thanks.