Here's the man himself.
It boils down to a simple (if terribly hyperbolic) set of analogies:
- "Why can't we move the bus garages out of our town and further away to redevelop the land?" Because we need the buses here, not travelling from there increasing cost and decreasing reliability.
- "Why can't we redevelop the Supermarket into housing and office space?" Because accessibility of a food source is a major priority and making it 100% car ownership-based in a city is a bad idea. Doing what the TD Garden did, however, absolutely prime.
- "Why can't we redevelop the fire stations into housing and move them into other towns? They're on prime real estate." (The most hyperbolic of them all)
The point is this: Cities requiring staging areas, industrial zones, and other infrastructure needs, etc., that no one wants to live next to and are in prime "land" because that's what is required to make the city work. Take them away and you get Hartford, CT (SHOTS FIRED ((
New England's Rising Star)).