reverend_paco
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2012
- Messages
- 401
- Reaction score
- 261
Re: Dudley Square Residential Tower | Washington St. | Roxbury
How about that height though?
How about that height though?
Cool off and have a Schlitz tall boy and CC nip chaser, schmuck.
toby you're good. Im plenty cool now. Like your posts... you're not the offender(s) I really was referring to (although you should know schvitz from Schlitz).
I don't like self righteous posts. People on the internet think it's cool to just attack people like W and it ain't cool.
How about that height though?
toby you're good. Im plenty cool now. Like your posts... you're not the offender(s) I really was referring to (although you should know schvitz from Schlitz).
I don't like self righteous posts. People on the internet think it's cool to just attack people like W and it ain't cool.
The big towers help Roxbury; they are just the neighborhoods adding capacity in the vertical direction because that's the only way you can add the capacity that's required. It doesn't hurt Roxbury in any when you increase the number of habitable units... quite the contrary. The neighborhoods aren't yet close to functional levels of density. There's a difference between density and allowing gentrification to destroy a neighborhood.
It was all in jest! (My father lived on Morton Street in the early 30's before he moved to Brookline. One of his fond stories was about walking over to Blue Hill Ave to see the opening of "42nd Street" at the Morton Theatre.)
I can't tell if you're for real or playing a character that is the id of the pro-development commenters on the board. If it's the latter, well played.
I think one point Whigh attempts to make that is underappreciated is how much in the 21st century people tend to see neighborhood demographics as entities that are more longstanding than they actually are, and that need to be preserved. I definitely am not a fan of gentrification, generally speaking, but Roxbury and JP 60-70 years ago were just totally different demographics than they are now.
My Grandmother grew up in Fields Corner. She is as white as they come. The back of the hill was a black neighborhood. Not anymore. The key to any successful neighborhood is it having a dynamic character. Frankly, as a white dude, I enjoy going to Dudley and enjoying it's distinct character. I don't mean to say that I want it "stay black", but I... maybe I do, I just want it to stay dynamic, and if that means black women who work as doctors at BMC move into the top floors of this place, well then, YEAH!!!
if that means black women who work as doctors at BMC move into the top floors of this place, well then, YEAH!!!
Very cool.. It's amazing how many Jews moved from blue hill ave area to Brookline... Redlining etc etc discussed to death elsewhere but yeah, such a quick change in neighborhood.
I think one point Whigh attempts to make that is underappreciated is how much in the 21st century people tend to see neighborhood demographics as entities that are more longstanding than they actually are, and that need to be preserved. I definitely am not a fan of gentrification, generally speaking, but Roxbury and JP 60-70 years ago were just totally different demographics than they are now. Our time an extremely sentimental one - if people cared about preserving communities and architecture and "historical" stuff 100 yrs ago the way they do now, we would have no city at all...
Hopefully this development happens, though... I'm not necessarily advocating clear preservation of roxburys status as the one black neighborhood of Boston, but the power structure in this city is white as can be and it would be nice to see a successful - and large - project built and run by local black people instead of the usual crowd.
It is nice to have that potted history here, but all the same, it doesn't speak very much to the history and conditions of the area's current residents, which are very, very different. "Stuff changes" doesn't speak to the nature of any particular change.
Building more housing does not push people out of neighborhoods. Study after study has shown that gentrification acutally helps residents and causes them to stay more than the neighborhood being seedy.
This would seem true and simple for those who own, but not so much for renters.
Once the neighborhood gets on the hot new place to live radar, rents become outrageous. This pushes out the lower and lower middle class folks who make up a lot of pre-gentrified neighborhoods.