Pierce
Active Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2008
- Messages
- 461
- Reaction score
- 1
Isn't this a value-engineered riff on this Zaha Hadid design?
no more than it is a ripoff of office da or un studio, which is to say, i don't think so. It's hard for someone to claim turf on "droopy" architecture in this digital age.
I don't know anything about these projects outside of what's on this board, but on first glance I actually read the Utile roof as being the means for a clever rainwater solution, which it appears to be now that I glance through their website images, whereas Hadid's just reads as purely an aesthetic conceit.
As far as this architect being negligent for doing the concrete work onsite "next to the ocean", I don't think any of us are informed enough on the specifics of this (or for the most part of us, on structural engineering in general) to really have a valuable opinion on this. There is plenty of oceanfront concrete architecture out there, cheap concrete at that, that has weathered quite well (buy a ticket to fort warren at this pavilion and go see for yourself), and there are plenty of curvey concrete forms that have been cast in place and lasted (pick up a corbusier book).