Probably asked and answered, but what is the construction project on an entire square parcel of the RKG near the Customs House?
Another few observations of the RKG after a walk from SS to FH yesterday:
1. Above comments re. buildings facing away from RKG due to history are spot on. Near Aquarium are long streetwalls with nothing of value for pedestrian.
2. Intercontinental and Independence Wharf, both fairly recent projects, are TERRIBLE in their interface with RKG. This is surprising since A) RKG was a known entity and B) public comments prior to approvals for both projects highlighted these problems.
3. The RKG is incredibly well maintained and it is appreciated to stroll along on a December day and see hardy plants instead of dreary trees and shrubs.
4. The artwork is extremely sterile, little challenging and sometimes seems like an opportunity for architects to burnish resumes as opposed to presenting mindblowing work. Architects seem to be investing heavily in structural experiments that left me bereft of the benefit of great art.
5. Too many signs. Don't climb on sculpture. Don't sit here. Park closes at 11:00 PM. Please donate to the Conservancy. Etc.
To get into psychoanalysis, these last two points seem representative of a decision-making process dominated by folks who are either anal retentive of fearful of the unknown.
On the recent discussion regarding Boston in general. It is notable that Boston doesn't have a district with an EXTREME residential density -- I mean the equivalent of the Financial District with housing instead of office space. That may be the kind of density required to activate something as large as the RKG.
Overall I still give the RKG a thumbs-up long term. As the Globe suggested recently, patience is key.
Another few observations of the RKG after a walk from SS to FH yesterday:
1. Above comments re. buildings facing away from RKG due to history are spot on. Near Aquarium are long streetwalls with nothing of value for pedestrian.
2. Intercontinental and Independence Wharf, both fairly recent projects, are TERRIBLE in their interface with RKG. This is surprising since A) RKG was a known entity and B) public comments prior to approvals for both projects highlighted these problems.
3. The RKG is incredibly well maintained and it is appreciated to stroll along on a December day and see hardy plants instead of dreary trees and shrubs.
4. The artwork is extremely sterile, little challenging and sometimes seems like an opportunity for architects to burnish resumes as opposed to presenting mindblowing work. Architects seem to be investing heavily in structural experiments that left me bereft of the benefit of great art.
5. Too many signs. Don't climb on sculpture. Don't sit here. Park closes at 11:00 PM. Please donate to the Conservancy. Etc.
To get into psychoanalysis, these last two points seem representative of a decision-making process dominated by folks who are either anal retentive of fearful of the unknown.
On the recent discussion regarding Boston in general. It is notable that Boston doesn't have a district with an EXTREME residential density -- I mean the equivalent of the Financial District with housing instead of office space. That may be the kind of density required to activate something as large as the RKG.
Overall I still give the RKG a thumbs-up long term. As the Globe suggested recently, patience is key.