Couple articles on the town: one in the Times from a couple week ago, one in the Globe today.
Times - Out of the Shadow of Boston and Cambridge
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/05/travel/out-of-the-shadow-of-boston-and-cambridge.html?_r=0
Globe - Boston-area communities vie to be the next Somerville
http://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyl...le/j56PBWBoCNvX0bpUDmgw1M/story.html#comments
My observation: Somerville is getting more press than it deserves. The city is mirrored by Southie--a dense and historically white, middle class community a couple miles from downtown Boston that is seeing an influx of new construction in old industrial areas, and a lot of infill projects in its triple decker neighborhoods.
Southie merits all of its attention from a purely developmental perspective. It is growing much bigger and much faster than Somerville. Outside of Assembly, I'm not seeing infill projects on anything close to the scale you see in Southie.
And yet all the Southie articles are about winter parking and us-vs-them, while the Somerville articles are about exciting new places to eat or play.
Perhaps it is because Southie's growth is, to be harsh, not very interesting. For every brewery and artisan nut or chocolate maker in Somerville, Southie builds a sports bar. Nothing against the latter, but they don't make for interesting write-ups in Conde Nast.
And yet driving down Southie's Broadway today compared to ten years ago, it feels like a different world. It's exploding. Compare that with Union Square (or worse, Somerville's Broadway) and, at first glance, you'd think, what's all the fuss about? It's still pretty dumpy.
So perhaps the attention in Somerville is due to the quality of the growth rather than the quantity. Most of the new places that open are truly unique and attract outsiders (case-in-point, I can't even get a seat at most of the restaurants near my house on a weekday night, such as Sarma or Highland Kitchen.)
But frankly, I'm surprised Union Square, in particular, gets as much ink as it does.