whighlander
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2006
- Messages
- 7,812
- Reaction score
- 647
Re: South Station Tower
Lapradetom -- that's one of the reasons that this is part of a Pru-scale project -- the tower by itself is not enough
for one thing the lobby of the tower has to float in the sky a couple of stories above the train tracks and then it has to connect somewhere with the ground to allow people to ascend to the lobby
well there are a lot of train tracks to be dealt with
That's why I think it was Ill-planned -- jumping at the opportunity before the ideas for the USPS site were floated
the Tower should be sited on top of the USPS footprint with a glass and titanium canopy over the train tracks reminiscent of the original canopy
Question (If anyone knows): Is constructing a large development/tower like this over existing "infrastructure" a lot more complicated/expensive than with a traditional building situation? If so, how could the economics of a much more expensive project even make it viable? The developer can't just pass the cost on to the tenants. Train vibration/noise/fume mitigation, a 677' tower straddling train tracks, connecting to existing/new buildings, etc. It would seem this would cost mega-buck$.
Lapradetom -- that's one of the reasons that this is part of a Pru-scale project -- the tower by itself is not enough
for one thing the lobby of the tower has to float in the sky a couple of stories above the train tracks and then it has to connect somewhere with the ground to allow people to ascend to the lobby
well there are a lot of train tracks to be dealt with
That's why I think it was Ill-planned -- jumping at the opportunity before the ideas for the USPS site were floated
the Tower should be sited on top of the USPS footprint with a glass and titanium canopy over the train tracks reminiscent of the original canopy