Re: Longfellow Place (née Garden Garage Towers) | 35 Lomasney Way | West End
re; DBM; Well, maybe. Still, i would start at 300' to get a more accurate picture. After the novelty Pru, the pace of construction of 380~600' towers was fairly strong from 1964~84, or perhaps you might get as broad as 1964~88, as unabashed height began to trail off.
After 60 State and the Fed Reserve in 1977, we get into the 2nd of back to back to back recessions from 1973~82. This itself is interesting because Massachusetts experienced less exposure to the infamous 'double-dip' in the early 80s, if the prolonged Massachusetts & SF tech booms didn't contribute to helping the US economy out of the fire altogether.
Despite the '80~82 'double dip' wave (perhaps the 3rd recession in less than a decade), we got 7 highrises in 4 years (completed) between 1981 and 85 well-timed for the tech/ financial/legal services boom/s of the mid/late 80's; 1 Post Office Sq ~520', The Marriot 395' The Westin 381', 1 Devonshire Pl ~415', Dewey Square ~600', Exchange Place ~540' and 500 Boylston about 332'. Construction starts stopped when money dried up briefly, from about 1981~83, But with the Reagan boom, we got another burst w/ 4 towers in 1987~88 when supply was already pretty good!
It had been 5 years since Flynn declared war on the Skyscraper. And, in the last gasp of the Mass tech boom, only 1 IP went tall, w/ the other 3 towers going ~380'. *The (3) 380' towers rest on sites that could properly handle 650~750'.
By about 1989, the Mass tech economy had cooled and the nimby years settled in. During the Flynn & Menino years starting around 1988, highrises above 300~350' slowed to a trickle. After IP, between 1987 and 2016 (29 yrs), only 3 towers rose over 500', only 8 above 400', w/ a few others barely topping 300'.
Sexy tower construction probably doesn't reveal as much about Boston's rise–as much as sacred institutions of higher learning, Boston's historical renown and regional appeal (not that anyone asked).
When you look at the various gaps, they clearly reflect those times visited upon the tightening of credit, a Mass tech bust, Big Dig, and nimby years w/ their build-it-squat-n-fat mayoral stooges. Through tumultuous periods of change–a process that steered clear of wild speculation, and stayed the course produced a prolonged miracle.
*Milton Friedman pours the recession years out on the table in Money Mischief-Episodes In Monetary History-1994. Boston construction in the 70's and 80's reflects the credit tightening periods.
/