A smidge off topic but it relates to this. I don't think necessarily every building that they decide to keep in Boston has to be some historical landmark. The regular old generic Boston brick buildings also contribute to making the city what it is. Im not saying keep everything, but we shouldn't tear down everything that isn't a landmark. This building is up for debate but the more buildings like this that are torn down the more the city loses its character. Im not 100% one way or another, Im not saying keep every old building in the city and Im not saying tear down everything thats not a landmark. A nice balance will be great for the city. If it looks good keep it whether its a landmark or not, if it sucks tear it down.