Beton Brut
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 25, 2006
- Messages
- 4,382
- Reaction score
- 336
...the city is supposed to act as an extension of the public's will to suppress that impulse in service of other goals (e.g., civic beauty).
I agree, we need to have public officials (elected and appointed) with a more evolved and nuanced understanding of aesthetics, both in terms of urban planning and the design of individual buildings; how things look, and how things "fit," and the synergies between these related priorities.
We are collectively too smart to just throw our hands up and say it's impossible to make money on skinny buildings.
Ah, the wisdom of crowds...
The more inclusive the "we" is, the further from a desirable result we seem to get. And to be clear, I'm all for inclusiveness, but we're woefully unprepared for it.
The real issue is that as a society, we fail completely to educate children, teenagers, and adults in any substantive matters about the built environment. Nothing in History, or Civics, or Sociology. Every person, every day, interacts with the built environment, yet too few of us are granted the tools, the syntax, the grammar to have an intelligent conversation about the built environment.
This is the hill I'll likely die on...