Charlie_mta
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2006
- Messages
- 4,168
- Reaction score
- 5,556
The original design was too good.Wish I hadn’t loved the original design so much.
The original design was too good.Wish I hadn’t loved the original design so much.
Of course not. It's way too interesting and exciting to be seriously proposed in Boston.I could be wrong but I don't think that was ever a serious proposal.
All towers everywhere are by definition "tumescent"--they stand tall and erect. Otherwise, they'd collapse (or they'd not in fact be towers, but would be gas stations, or big-box econo retailers, or mortuaries, or whatever...).
Thus, I'd love to hear the explanation of how "tumescence," instead of being a universal feature involving, you know.... being tall, erect, and possessing structural integrity ... is in fact part of a highly pernicious syndrome localized to Boston's architectural ecosystem... I'll wait!
Pretty sure Toby is using the other, literary minded meaning of the word, ie pretentious.All towers everywhere are by definition "tumescent"--they stand tall and erect. Otherwise, they'd collapse (or they'd not in fact be towers, but would be gas stations, or big-box econo retailers, or mortuaries, or whatever...).
Perhaps “saddle bag” or “mud flap” tickles your torpedo?