It appears the sidewalk is now a driveway?
No.
Elkus acknowledged the sidewalk/drive access was under-developed at that point, as they were still in the proces of exploring options when the EPNF was released. The BCDC asked Elkus to clarify the ground plane and how/where pedestrians will have to share the sidewalk in spots due to the building's service functions (loading & valet car parking) that must be on the front of the building. The whole sidewalk won't be a free-for-all, but there will be some shared pedestrian realm. The BCDC was optimistic that they could find an innovative solution.
Heres an innovative solution: No parking in the building.
Ill take my fee now
Agreed. I worked as a delivery truck driver for staples for the past 2 summers and winter breaks and have driven a number of different routes all over the Boston area. I believe that a residential building of this size does not need loading dock space as the amount of supplies delivered at any 1 time will never be too large to just bring in the front or up a small ramp somewhere on the side of the building.
Loading dock I can accept. I can also accept that they can pull off a shared sidewalk to allow safe loading dock ops for peds and bikes.
I cannot accept more parking here - not when there are other developments and offices nearby that're bound to have parking availability when workers leave and residents come home. I'm also not sure how loading dock ops aren't going to gum up that intersection...
The vehicle access of most large apartment buildings, hotels, and other high rises in the city share sidewalk space with pedestrians. Is the fuss with this building due to the setback of the building with the large sidewalk out front? If I'm not mistaken, the sidewalk in front of the Intercontinental Hotel actually swings around under the hotel portico to allow for drop on/off of passengers and such. Also, no way around not having loading docks, they're much needed for trash pick-up, moving vans, etc.
So because its done badly elsewhere its ok to do it badly here?
Jrubbs -- there was just this past 24 hours a small fire in a high rise -- s residential building at the Pru -- in guess where
The trash chute -- 20 stories of residences generates a lot of garbage
Jrubbs -- there was just this past 24 hours a small fire in a high rise -- s residential building at the Pru -- in guess where
The trash chute -- 20 stories of residences generates a lot of garbage
Heres an innovative solution: No parking in the building.
Ill take my fee now
As this is a residential building, you'd still need a loading dock and service elevator of some sort for people to use when moving in/out.
I'm interested in your thoughts as to how loading docks/parking would be accessed into buildings that are built behind sidewalks without crossing over those sidewalks. Live in a home in the burbs with a driveway, you're driving over the sidewalk if there's one in front of the house.
Its about minimizing the driveway. In this building, the derivable area looks to be 4-5 cars wide. Thats huge.
I'm at the BCDC meeting if anyone wants to say hi.
150 Seaport Blvd - BCDC Meeting Notes
April 26, 2016
Massing model studies
- looked at option of a skirt around base of building, but decided against it.
- skirt reached dead end... Balcony on 2nd floor now; studying restaurant on waterfront side now
- they'd love to put fire/mech room below grade if they could, but they're studying it
- by bringing balconies to edge f this form, it indicates there is a residential use. They like how it takes advantage of the residential views.
- an idea that the railings might engage the sails
- they've taken the balconies on south facade expressed, then looking at E capturing them... They've settled on opening them again because it looked very flat
- structure carried down and bottom balcony extended across
Ground Floor (site) plan
- question about the ground plan down pier 4 (granite used and pavers along harbor walk down that way).
- the intent was to do the sidewalks I'm painted concrete
- wanted to look at a way to organize the block... Want to stay calm in terms of curb.
- Infill zone will use darker tone of concrete pavement on side walks, and then the calmer concrete around quieter spaces of site. Granite lines will define lines of building.
-Elkus: there's a slope that starts at edge of concrete, and what they've suggested following the vectors of the structure was to almost go out onto the water this way... As oppose to having the harbor walk engage the blvd.
- water feature: why wouldn't that be wood or an area to walk? (To be addressed momentarily)
- overhead wire above the deck
- concerns over parking zones, 10' of sidewalk consistent across site line
- BTD much prefers this curb cut... They want the cars up and off the street entirely
- "you're misrepresnting just how heavily used the garage and loading docks are, and the number of trips there a day, and the public disturbance."
- there are 179 total parking spaces at building; 20 of them will be dedicated to the restaurant
- traffic engineer has modeled traffic movement... Vehicle and pedestrian movement was modeled
- it could be good to have 4 or 5 guide reels showing the worst circumstances
- Fire/Mech is at ground floor
- they want to reach out to Society of Arts and Crafts and others to program the wall facing 100 Pier 4; an opportunity to inform visitors
- some complaints from BCDC members that there are still 0 renderings for them to see of the garage doors, views from the west of the site, and harborside views of the screen facade shielding the transformer vault... architects said they'd come back with those renderings for them