Roads and Highways General Development Thread

Also, 30-minute frequencies on the Framingham/Worcester line (planned for late 2026)

They had that before the pandemic (at Peak). I'd wonder if there would even be room at South Station to go back to those levels, even if they wanted to.

Will say that I've seen people taking Ubers to the Natick Mall. Which to me is crazier than living in a place like Natick without a car and taking the bus.
 
It's odd that the above narrative from MassDOT is focused narrowly on preserving an aging and ill-suited roadway system. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting different results. How about establishing a new paradigm that downsizes the current lane-miles in the state highway system, and increases the network of passenger and freight rail and multi-use paths. Why commit the vast majority of resources towards perpetuating a failing car-centric system?
 
It's odd that the above narrative from MassDOT is focused narrowly on preserving an aging and ill-suited roadway system. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting different results. How about establishing a new paradigm that downsizes the current lane-miles in the state highway system, and increases the network of passenger and freight rail and multi-use paths. Why commit the vast majority of resources towards perpetuating a failing car-centric system?
Is that the narrative you took from this interview? It seemed to me like it was all about innovative management and construction techniques that often involved demand management. Most of the bridges he was talking about are 2 lanes wide... are you suggesting MassDOT just get rid of them?

Gulliver is the Highway Administrator, not the Secretary. He'll talk mostly about highways...
 
Is that the narrative you took from this interview? It seemed to me like it was all about innovative management and construction techniques that often involved demand management. Most of the bridges he was talking about are 2 lanes wide... are you suggesting MassDOT just get rid of them?

Gulliver is the Highway Administrator, not the Secretary. He'll talk mostly about highways...
MassHighway is a bit of a misnomer, they're responsible for all massdot surface roads and the massdot owned shared-use-paths. They're responsible for bike/ped along with motor vehicles.

Not sure where your bridge comment is coming from, I don't see how one could interpret Charlie's post that way.
 
Is that the narrative you took from this interview? It seemed to me like it was all about innovative management and construction techniques that often involved demand management. Most of the bridges he was talking about are 2 lanes wide... are you suggesting MassDOT just get rid of them?

Gulliver is the Highway Administrator, not the Secretary. He'll talk mostly about highways...
I'm mostly talking about downsizing expressway lanes, and in some cases entire expressways, not taking out local and arterial bridges that cross over waterways and railroads. Anyway, I did indeed find the article highway-centric. Gulliver is the Highway Administrator, but these public releases set the tone for the agency, and when they talk about roads and road bridges only, it sets the wrong tone. MassDOT has historically been a road agency, and time and again they come across as being stuck in that mode.
 
Looking at it on Street View, that is a _weird_ design for the new bridge.
 
Looking at it on Street View, that is a _weird_ design for the new bridge.
If you are referring to the draw mechanism, yes I agree -- seems it is a rare (in the US) Dutch-style bascule bridge where all the draw mechanism (machinery room, counter weight) is overhead to protect the mechanicals from flooding. Design was selected to protect the crossing from climate change damage.

Contractor's Project Page:
 
Last edited:
I'm mostly referring to the big partial gears and linkage that raise and lower the bridge. I'd have expected the drive mechanism to operate on the counterweight beam.
 
Last edited:
I'm mostly referring to the big partial gears and linkage 1 that raise and lower the bridge. I'd have expected the drive mechanism to operate on the counterweight beam.
STV, the designers (vs SPS, the builders) actually recently posted about this. Their reasoning is below.
The span drive machinery utilized a unique approach to raising and lowering the span. Historically, the span drive for a movable bridge like this one would start with a high-speed electric motor driving a series of either open or enclosed reduction gears, so speed is reduced while drive torque is increased until we get to the main pinion that drives an articulated rack connected to the bascule girder. Because of the adjacent sidewalks and potential for injury, as well as resulting gear lubrication spilling onto the sidewalks, we decided we would drive the span through a large segmental gear connected to the span through a link arm, which ultimately provides for the raising and lowering of the span. https://stvinc.com/insight/innovati...-belden-bly-bridge-delivery-in-massachusetts/
I switched out of the engineering track fairly early on, but this bridge reminded me a lot less of a Dutch draw, the "double beam" drawbridge, and more of a Strauss bascule from the 1930s, and a quick double check with Google of that makes me pretty sure that SPS isn't correct in calling it a dutch draw. Since this is now a deck bridge and not a through truss, STV's logic make more sense in displacing the operating elements out of reach. The "operating strut" is no longer a rack gear, but linked to that segmental gear which conveniently lines up next to the machinery room.
1000042284.jpg


1000042288.jpg
 
Update on the highway teardown in Fall River. Looking good!

Looks wonderful. Like everywhere in Ma fall river needs lots of housing too so what a gift it is to get a massive new stretch of greenfield land right next to the commuter rail station. I really hope they follow through with the plan and build it out very densely. They could add a serious amount of new units here. On top of that itd be nice to see them also redevelop the waterfront. With southcoast rail now up and running its the perfect time for the town to get a huge amount of land to add housing. If nimbys dont squash everything down it could be huge. I think now would also be the perfect time to remove any parking requirements, before they start building.
 
“MassDOT is hosting a virtual public meeting to share plans to replace the William Reid Overpass over Brookline Street in Cambridge, including proposed improvements to the intersection below. Cambridge residents are encouraged to attend and share feedback at the virtual meeting on Tuesday, January 6.”

Learn more and register: https://camb.ma/3KTMmza
1767565272114.png


 
“MassDOT is hosting a virtual public meeting to share plans to replace the William Reid Overpass over Brookline Street in Cambridge, including proposed improvements to the intersection below. Cambridge residents are encouraged to attend and share feedback at the virtual meeting on Tuesday, January 6.”

Learn more and register: https://camb.ma/3KTMmza
View attachment 69837

This brick structure is attractive and worth saving, and should be repurposed into a non-auto facility. Convert it to pedestrian and bike path only, with landscaping suitable for a land-bridge type structure, similar to the High Line in NYC. I would remove the westbound section of the bridge to make room for rerouting memorial Drive to the north side of the remaining eastbound bridge:

1767578299079.png
 
Last edited:

Back
Top