TheRifleman
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2008
- Messages
- 4,431
- Reaction score
- 0
I actually have a question for this board?
How can a Non-profit organization that pays no taxes and claims it does humanity work --fund organizations/place people in political roles to stop economic progress in the city that values no merit?
How is this LEGAL? Using non-profit money for an agenda that does not seem like humanity work.
"Boston is well recognized for its historic waterfront and harbor; yet, this public treasure is in jeopardy,” Canales wrote
Canale is talking about a Garage that completely derailed Chap 91 State laws since being inacted 1866
That is not a private developer/Investor's fault that the state/city allowed a garage to be built there in the first place.
Chap91 contradicts itself at this point. The garage is blocking anytype of public interest towards the water. That is my point Stellarfun how did the garage get built if Chap 91 was intact since 1866. They basically ignored the law.
The public best interest is to move forward with Chiofaro plan.
Garage vs Tower
If they had a vote in the state of Mass and what the public would prefer.
The garage or Chiofaro proposals. The public would pick the proposals over the garage.
And letting him build this per his SPECS is the best interest for the PUBLIC and the city of Boston.
Overall situation is Chiofaro/Pru bought the garage to build something in the public's best interest. Not to claim that the garage is a public treasure.
How can a Non-profit organization that pays no taxes and claims it does humanity work --fund organizations/place people in political roles to stop economic progress in the city that values no merit?
How is this LEGAL? Using non-profit money for an agenda that does not seem like humanity work.
"Boston is well recognized for its historic waterfront and harbor; yet, this public treasure is in jeopardy,” Canales wrote
Canale is talking about a Garage that completely derailed Chap 91 State laws since being inacted 1866
That is not a private developer/Investor's fault that the state/city allowed a garage to be built there in the first place.
Chap91 contradicts itself at this point. The garage is blocking anytype of public interest towards the water. That is my point Stellarfun how did the garage get built if Chap 91 was intact since 1866. They basically ignored the law.
The public best interest is to move forward with Chiofaro plan.
Garage vs Tower
If they had a vote in the state of Mass and what the public would prefer.
The garage or Chiofaro proposals. The public would pick the proposals over the garage.
And letting him build this per his SPECS is the best interest for the PUBLIC and the city of Boston.
Overall situation is Chiofaro/Pru bought the garage to build something in the public's best interest. Not to claim that the garage is a public treasure.