Cambridge Infill and Small Developments

The article said it would consist of studios, 1 and 2 bedroom units and a price range of 1500 to 3000. I don't understand why anyone would pay 1500 a month in rent for a studio in a complex on the side of a highway. In North Allston, a neighborhood better in everyway, 1500 can probably get you a solid two bedroom w/ character and possibly even a yard and utilities included.
 
The article said it would consist of studios, 1 and 2 bedroom units and a price range of 1500 to 3000. I don't understand why anyone would pay 1500 a month in rent for a studio in a complex on the side of a highway. In North Allston, a neighborhood better in everyway, 1500 can probably get you a solid two bedroom w/ character and possibly even a yard and utilities included.

Not that I'd pay that price, but as barren as Alewife is, there are plenty of people who would rather pay $1500 to live in a clean, modern building than in a dank, old 2 bedroom in the North Allston student slums.
 
My basic problem with this building is that it's inconvenient to reach both by car and by transit.

In a car, you have to deal with the Route 2/16 intersection which is frequently jammed with traffic. It's difficult to get to from the east (requiring a U-turn at the Lake Street interchange), and difficult to go west from it (requiring a U-turn at Alewife).

By public transit, you have a bleak and lonely walk along Route 2, or possibly through the Cambridge Discovery office park, to get to Alewife station.

I foresee lots of vacancies, and a large loss for the developer/landlord. It's just the wrong place for a residential development, for reasons beyond the developer's control.

Who would choose to live here instead of in Davis Square, Porter Square, or East Arlington?
 
Last edited:
That would be mainly the other side of the pike. N Allston is probably just as much families and profesionals as it is college kids. There are some streets that are kind of slummy, but some really nice ones where big beautiful houses have been divided up. Then keep in mind the N Allston's Charles river park, which is great, and everything Harvard offers and all the sports feilds, and closer proximity to Harvard Sq/Allston Cntr/Central Sq/ Brighton Center/ Pike/Storrow and I'd say its just a better nieghborhood in every way.
 
Last edited:
My basic problem with this building is that it's inconvenient to reach both by car and by transit.

In a car, you have to deal with the Route 2/16 intersection which is frequently jammed with traffic. It's difficult to get to from the east (requiring a U-turn at the Lake Street interchange), and difficult to go west from it (requiring a U-turn at Alewife).

By public transit, you have a bleak and lonely walk along Route 2, or possibly through the Cambridge Discovery office park, to get to Alewife station.

I foresee lots of vacancies, and a large loss for the developer/landlord. It's just the wrong place for a residential development, for reasons beyond the developer's control.

Who would choose to live here instead of in Davis Square, Porter Square, or East Arlington?

Thats the thing though, the problem is access, not the location. Alewife isnt a bad area, quick red line access to Harvard and beyond, and lots of buses out to arlington, lexington etc.

Thats an easy thing to fix.

1) Fix the route 2/16 "intersection". A 3rd grader could plot it out better.

2) Provide a road to the business park, which itself has a road up to lake street, not requiring access to route 2. As my picture shows, there IS a road...it's just closed. Idiotic.

3) Make the pedestrian bridge actually access the very large park across route 2.

And finally....

At that point, once it reaches Faces, route 2 is no longer a limited access highway. You enter/exit the parking lot directly into the lanes, the the speed limit is posted as 35. Remove the guardrails, remove the fencing, add a u-turn lane, and bam, you have an "urban" street instead of a highway. (it would be as urban as something like memorial drive).

You could even demolish the pedestrian overpass and add a crosswalk with a traffic signal.
 
All good ideas, but you still have the basic problem that the development is isolated from even the most mundane retail services, such as a convenience store or a drugstore or a Dunkin Donuts.
 
All good ideas, but you still have the basic problem that the development is isolated from even the most mundane retail services, such as a convenience store or a drugstore or a Dunkin Donuts.

It'd be easier if there was an actual footpath from Alewife station to the shopping mall instead of having to cross the street. That would significantly de-isolate the area. As is, people have worn their own footpath "ramp" down the hillside from the bridge so mall access and Danehy Park are at least imperfectly closer to Alewife and Rindge Ave. They prop a shopping cart on the retaining wall at the bottom to jump down rather than walk a couple hundred feet more to the driveway. Kids especially use this to get to Danehy Park to avoid the ridiculous Sherman St. end-run. You would think after all these years of this DIY practice that somebody would take the hint that this is an unequivocal expression of demand for a ramp on that side.

Second would be to get an actual grade-separated path from Alewife across the tracks to avoid having to cross the parkway at all. And then re-do the parking lot asphalt wasteland on the northwest corner so you can actually reach the stores, cinema, and Danehy Park without getting killed by cars swerving around ineffective speed bumps for their own personal 50 MPH expressway bypass around the Fresh Pond rotaries.


Why can't they do something like this:

Initial Build
-- Landscape a sidewalk all the way from the Alewife driveway/Cambridgepark Dr. intersection, along the back of the Summer Shack driveway, and curving under the bridge. The space under the bridge is used for nothing except Cambridge DPW storing palettes of sidewalk bricks.
-- Put a footbridge over the tracks to where Terminal Rd. meets the Mall parking lot.
-- Re-landscape the parking lot so there's actual medians w/sidewalk for traversing the distance to the stores, movie theater, and rear exit to Danehy Park and the just-built New St. condos without getting squashed. Separate parking spaces from egress to calm the incredibly dangerous speeds across the lot from Terminal Rd. to New St.. Sort of like the renovated Assembly Square plaza lot, but with better sidewalks through the lot. Plant a few trees on these medians to make it look like less a trash-windswept moonscape.
-- Put an ACTUAL ramp up to the parkway where that DIY footpath is so bicyclists, the handicapped, kids, and people pushing strollers can get to the other side of the parkway from Alewife without needing to cross at Rindge Ave. Rindge isn't a terribly unsafe intersection because of the two shortish-cycle traffic lights in quick succession and the ramps from the station exits on each side. But the parkway is still psychologically daunting to cross and physically isolating. Especially for all the small kids in the area.


Related Gap-filler (de-isolating Alewife with infill links):
-- Redo the sidewalks on Terminal Rd. for ped friendliness where the no-longer-DIY hillside path and the footbridge over the tracks meet. Put in a bike lane on Terminal...car speeds aren't that bad on it because of the curves. Now the renovated plaza across the street and 185 Alewife are actually pedestrian/bike accessible too and not half a world away from Rindge Ave. or the mall directly across the street.
-- Stick a path BEHIND the plaza where there's currently just a couple employee parking spots and fenced-off dumpsters to link the Concord Ave./reservoir pedestrian light and those isolated condos on Wheeler St. to Alewife in grade-separated fashion. Do ped-friendlier sidewalks and a bike path on Wheeler just like on Terminal. Now you actually have a contiguous path from the Minuteman system to the Fresh Pond paths and fill in the pointless 1/4 mile gap in the path system. It's incredibly dangerous for the bicyclists who are pretty much S.O.L. through the gap, and while the sidewalks on the parkway are wide and safe pedestrians psychologically avoid them because of the cars screaming by. They cut through the plaza parking lot and dodge cars clumsily moving around the poor lot layout, which ends up being even more dangerous. This removes the last safety and psychological barrier to linking all the paths, parks, and development on the parkway.
-- Put a stub sidewalk from the tracks footbridge down to the Rindge Ave. apartments so there's access from there. Now the kids can get safely from the DCR park to Danehy Park without making a ridiculous end run to Sherman St. or climbing down the hillside and playing human Frogger in the parking lot expressway. And can finally get to Fresh Pond.


Other Future Considerations:
-- The decrepit Watertown Branch freight railroad has a path planned on the abandoned East Watertown portion linking the neighborhood to the Charles paths and eventually Watertown Square with Watertown Mall. Pan Am Railways is involved in a protracted dispute with the last customer on the line to abandon the rest of it all the way to Danehy Park where it junctions with the Fitchburg Line. The path would then be extended from East Watertown to Fresh Pond. Pan Am will eventually settle with that customer, and Cambridge and Watertown are chomping at the bit to complete this link because it'll get HUGE utilization (probably rivaling the Minuteman). This is a big reason why it would be insane to not fill that 1/4 gap between Alewife/Minuteman/Davis path and Fresh Pond.
-- Porter Square path. The Fitchburg line in ancient times had 4 tracks on it all the way out to Waltham, which is why they're able to fit the Green Line extension to Union Sq. on its existing footprint. If you look out Alewife way from the Porter overpass or any other streets you'll see how fricking wide it is...so wide that there's a fence at Sherman St. to keep people from joyriding cars and ATV's off-road next to the tracks. It's a de facto shortcut to Danehy Park and the mall anyway, as people just walk up the Watertown Branch split (vagrants have even ripped up the fence on the swampy corner of Danehy to get in). There is also, underneath the Walden St. bridge, a historic brick arch tunnel that used to be used in the 19th century to herd cattle from slaughterhouses near Porter for loading at the old Alewife rail yard. This tunnel was painstakingly restored when they rebuilt the Walden St. bridge because it's on the Historic Register. It's totally unused, though. Throw down a path from the footbridge/Rindge apartments access all the way to Porter rail-with-trail style, with proper fencing. Link with the commuter rail stairs, throw down sidewalk a ramp at the nicely renovated Walden Sq. Apartments pedestrian underpass. Now you've linked the apartment blocks on Sherman, two city schools, playgrounds, and Porter Shopping Center to Alewife with nothing but a simple pave job and chain-link fence.


With road options so limited, I really think a build-out of the path system like this is the only way to stitch together all that poorly designed odds-and-sods development around Alewife so they're actually somewhat connected to Cambridge via non-intimidating means. I think it's the only way the city can half-justify its hellbent desire to make lemonade out of a development lemon of a location. A couple of those access projects like the Alewife-Fresh Pond path infill and re-do of the mall parking lot for non-deadly pedestrian access to retail and Danehy Park are years overdue unto themselves for strictly safety reasons.
 
I agree with a lot of this. The city needs to put some pressure on the owner of the Fresh Pond shopping mall, since any ramp would be on their property. (Or the city needs to take land for the ramp by eminent domain, which might be expensive.)

The Porter Square shopping center parking lot is a good example of how to make such a stripmall reasonably friendly to pedestrians and cyclists.
 
Meanwhile, at places that have nothing to do with Alewife...

5538112925_5357e8cbdd_b.jpg


5538691912_2cef36b56c_b.jpg


5538114131_5d5f14777a_b.jpg


5538692344_9654f353d5_b.jpg


5538119603_98a611dc7a_b.jpg


5538120581_1c59b84ffb_b.jpg


5538698866_d50da5a755_b.jpg


5538121009_3a0d213998_b.jpg


5538121409_d0662e9341_b.jpg


5538700544_c920e084fd_b.jpg


5538122191_95fae0c2b1_b.jpg


5538122605_43b1617b15_b.jpg


5538122981_bd8ba9ea17_b.jpg


5538701960_e1d7f9c234_b.jpg


aaaaand back outside

5538125205_e6bb23dd2b_b.jpg


5538702504_0bbedff405_b.jpg


Hotel Veritas

5538711650_29b8eb39ca_b.jpg


You cannot escape him, and that's just how he likes it

5538133235_10224958ee_b.jpg
 
Last edited:
That new library is dam sexy! where in cambridge is it? im going to be in the city tomorrow and might check i out.
 
Am I crazy for not liking the front facade, viewed head-on? My "it will look like crap in 40 years" sense is tingling...
 
The new hotel looks great, although oddly shiny.
 
It's nothing more than a reproduction of the ordinary quadruple-decker that was originally on site.

It will also look like crap after 40 years.
 
Did anyone else notice that the Longy School of Music recently chopped down all of the trees on their Garden Street Campus? It looks like a barren wasteland now. I'm surprised this wasn't in the news...
 
I wonder if they were diseased?

The last time a tree got chopped down in Cambridge, there were angry protests (seriously).
 

Back
Top