Dozens protest bid to move City Hall
By John C. Drake
Globe Staff / September 23, 2008
Dozens of Boston residents packed a hearing yesterday to urge Mayor Thomas M. Menino and the City Council to keep City Hall - in all its ungainly, unsightly, and inefficient glory - right where it is.
The outpouring combined nostalgia for the concrete behemoth and practical arguments about its location with cries of protest against Menino's plan to build a new city hall on the South Boston waterfront.
"Moving City Hall is a bad idea which has no basis in reality," said resident Bill Myer. "It would be like moving Fenway Park to Stoughton."
The hearing was convened by Councilor Michael Flaherty, who is chairing a special committee on the future of City Hall and is widely expected to challenge Menino for mayor next year.
Flaherty has criticized Menino for not seeking public input on his proposal to abandon the old City Hall at Government Center and replace it with a modern, efficient, improved center overlooking Boston Harbor. Yesterday's forum - the first opportunity for organized public comment on the mayor's plan - gave Flaherty a platform to highlight an issue that has generated widespread objections in South Boston and elsewhere.
While unionized trades workers came out in force to support the mayor's proposal, a succession of residents said that the proposed South Boston waterfront site was inaccessible, that City Hall already was in a perfect location, and that moving it would be a waste of money.
"Why inconvenience everyone by moving City Hall to an area that is not centrally located?" said Hyde Park resident Gloria Ganno. "It would be unfortunate if [Menino's] legacy would be that he is remembered as the mayor who moved a perfectly situated City Hall to an inconvenient site."
Flaherty criticized Boston Redevelopment Authority director John F. Palmieri and Menino's chief planner, Kairos Shen, for investigating the development potential of the South Boston site without first gauging public sentiment for moving City Hall.
"Moving this building and constructing a lavish new City Hall will not make our city government more efficient, and it will not hold our elected leaders more accountable," Flaherty said.
But Menino aides insist it is still too early to hold public hearings on the proposal. Shen said officials are gathering data on the feasibility of locating the seat of government at the site called Drydock 4 on the waterfront, so that they can have answers for the public.
The BRA just issued a request for proposals for an engineering firm to evaluate the development potential of the site, including whether the Marine Industrial Park location can accommodate a 476,000-square-foot building, a year-round performance center, and parking garage. That study will cost $800,000.
Menino first broached the idea of moving City Hall to the waterfront in a December 2006 speech. Since then, architects have said that the mayor's proposal would threaten a historically significant building - a premier example of the brutalist style of architecture - and some community leaders have asserted that the waterfront lacks Government Center's convenience and transportation network.
City officials countered yesterday that Menino never suggested tearing down the current City Hall. Instead, they said it could be sold and adapted for use by a private owner.
Shen described the proposal to move City Hall to the waterfront as part of a broader municipal services strategy that includes locating some city functions in Roxbury's redeveloped Ferdinand Building, redeveloping Government Center, and creating a civic and municipal presence as part of the emergence of the South Boston waterfront as a vibrant neighborhood.
John C. Drake can be reached at
jdrake@globe.com.