That's demonstrably a poor standard through the continual lack of reengagement after being rudely rebuffed for not doing a full engineering study. This thread has been stifled from producing innovative conversation because of the ridiculous notion that "Crazy" accckktualllyy doesn't really mean Crazy.It's a "Pitch". The usage case and benefit need to be clearly defined with evidence, not "I thinks..." if
In fact, a crazy pitch brings up real ideas, like why are we holding back the entire chelsea creek for a tank farm that could easily have feeders farther south and still be protected?
Not getting paid, not going to write up a cost study. It's an internet forum for water-cooler transportation ideas.