Downtown Crossing/Financial District | Discussion

I like it. Wish it had a conveyor belt with bottles of wine like they do in Chicago but it looks nice.
 
Here's a map of the CVS locations in the area

There's also a Rite Aid on Cambridge Street near Bowdoin, and the small independent Green Cross pharmacy on Hanover Street in the North End, near the Prado. Until Walgreens opened, CVS had a near-monopoly on this very large and dense area.
 
Ha, I had no idea the CVS had moved in next door. Cray.
 
Ha, I had no idea the CVS had moved in next door. Cray.

There used to be 2 separate CVS locations on Washington Street in Downtown Crossing and they were condensed into the one you see now maybe 3-4 years ago.
 
There is still a CVS on Winter St and one on Summer St as well. Maybe Walgreens will bring them some price competition!
 
"Grab life by the berries." Oy vey.

This store is really nice. I bet it will look great at night. However, they should have a beer growler filling station like Duane Reade. :)
 
Interesting opinion article from the Globe:
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/...ow-ambition/UaofAONDxytUrmSxR0e47N/story.html

Walgreens in Downtown Crossing a sign of low ambition
By Paul McMorrow

THE HEAD of the Boston Redevelopment Authority stood surveying a gleaming bank of expensive skin lotions, unsure of what to make of them.

Peter Meade is in charge of development in Boston, and high-end skin care lies outside his area of expertise. Nevertheless, when merchants of fine lotions open up shop in town, it’s his job to show a friendly face. He allowed that it was an impressive array, and said he would alert his wife, who, of the two of them, is more the expert in such matters. Meade moved on. There was much to see: a juice bar, a sushi counter, coolers full of sandwiches and sodas and beers, a room in which to get one’s nails manicured, a desk for picking up prescription drugs. The new Walgreens flagship store in Downtown Crossing is a massive place. It opened last week in the old Borders storefront, and officials from both the city and the pharmacy chain are eager to show it off.

They shouldn’t be. The storefront at the corner of Washington and School Streets looks great, but the place stinks of low ambition. If a pharmacy that slings mediocre sushi is a sign of what’s to come from Downtown Crossing’s rebirth, the long-struggling neighborhood is headed down a very bad path.

The fancy new pharmacy looks inoffensive on the surface. It filled a high-profile vacancy at a time when folks inside City Hall were grasping for any shred of good news out of a downtown scarred by the gaping pit where the Filene’s department store once stood. The store will stay open 24 hours, and its diverse offerings should prove to be a welcome amenity for the folks who live in the expensive condominiums across the street.

At the same time, the store is utterly lacking in creativity. The Borders bankruptcy opened up one of the most prominent street corners in Boston at a time when Downtown Crossing is reinventing itself. The old Borders spot could’ve become anything in the world — a specialty grocer, a gourmet food hall, a multi-level roller disco. Anything. All it is, though, is a fancy drug store that does nothing to further Downtown Crossing’s budding comeback.

Officials from both the city and Walgreens are eager to show it off. They shouldn’t be.

A high-end pharmacy actually would have been a welcome addition to the Seaport, where residents are awash in fantastic restaurants, but lack places to buy essentials like pharmaceuticals and groceries. Downtown Crossing, on the other hand, already has an abundance of drug stores — three within shouting distance of the new Walgreens. It already has liquor stores and convenience stores and sandwich takeout joints. The new Walgreens will probably make buckets of money offering all these things under one roof, but it won’t deliver anything new.

Nor will it attract shoppers to the neighborhood. Residents in Jamaica Plain aren’t going to feel compelled to hop on the Orange Line to shop at the new pharmacy in Downtown Crossing, no matter how impressive it looks. The store is aimed at convenience shoppers who are already downtown. It doesn’t deepen the crowds in Downtown Crossing, and it does nothing to speak to Boston’s civic ambitions.

Putting a pharmacy in the old Borders storefront is wrongheaded in a way that recalls Downtown Crossing’s worst moments. Boston’s onetime commercial hub crumbled for a very specific reason: Downtown Crossing couldn’t offer shoppers anything they couldn’t find in the suburbs.

Urban neighborhoods overcome decades of flight to the suburbs by creating unique, exciting spaces. Part of this is in cities’ architecture, in the fabric of urban neighborhoods. No suburb is going to succeed in replicating the South End’s handsome rowhouses. But part of neighborhoods’ success lies in creating compelling destinations inside the urban fabric they’ve inherited. The bars, restaurants, coffee shops, and creative office companies cropping up around Downtown Crossing are beginning to carve out a young, vibrant niche in the neighborhood. They need more like-minded businesses to join them. Instead, they have a Walgreens, and, with it, a vision of the neighborhood that is corporate, sterile, and unimaginative.

It doesn’t have to be this way. In Cambridge’s Kendall Square, residents, city officials, landlords, and real estate brokers have collectively created a destination neighborhood by promoting unique, local, independent businesses to the exclusion of corporate retail. People come to Kendall because the square offers something they can’t get anywhere else. The landlords even make money off this fact. The Kendall playbook is simple, and it works. And it’s crying out for someone in Boston to steal it.
 
^ That article is, believe it or not, just a coherent and eloquent version of TheRifleman's central argument.
 
I don't like the assumption that there was anything Downtown Crossing (as if it were a sentient being) could have done to offer something better than the suburbs. No one set up shop downtown - who's fault is that? Maybe it is the city? Maybe its not anyone's fault. Maybe it is the people of Boston's fault. For Mr. McMarrow and all the grumpy old men on this board that pine for the golden days of yore - maybe it is your fault for not spending more money downtown and in the Mom and Pop shops.

How is the described success in Kendall any different than NIMBYs opposing every taller/denser development. People have a vision for their neighborhood and fight for it. To Walgreens, this location and business model looks like it will be a slamdunk success, just like a tower developer in Back Bay or wherever. If we (individually, a neighborhood association, the city, whoever) oppose it for no reason other than it is not what want, doesn't that make us just as arbitrary as any other NIMBY? And who is the appropriate NIMBY downtown to fight for this guy's roller disco and against the corporate chains? No one (relatively speaking) is there (yet) to care about their backyard.

Is the author calling for Peter Meade to be the "store czar" of Boston? The decider? Because then you don't get what you want and you don't get what the neighborhood wants, you get what the decider wants.
 
it does nothing to speak to Boston’s civic ambitions.
It offers convenient 24 amenities (something that can already be found in exactly zero other parts of the city keep in mind) to a neighborhood that's been desperately trying to transform itself from a dying commercial center into a lively live/work neighborhood. That's less ambitious than a roller disco? What the hell does a roller disco do to transform the neighborhood that the countless other destnation bars and theatres down there aren't all ready? Add maybe 2% to number of people already going to the Opera House, Orpheum, JM Curley's etc? As opposed to a store that signals that Downtown Crossing is ready to be a 24 hour residential neighborhood?
 
Kendall Square is an independent retail shopping destination mecca for the whole metro area? No. It does has some nice one-off restaurants and bars... and so does Downtown Crossing. Kendall is being activated by the development of nearby residential units... same with Downtown Crossing.

Does Kendall have a Walgreens or CVS? No. +1 Downtown Crossing.
 
Green Cross Pharmacy=good
CVS=bad
Fenway Pharmacy=good
Walgreens=bad
Gary Drug Co=good
Rite Aid=bad

Support your local economy and a diverse downtown!
 
Green Cross Pharmacy=good
CVS=bad
Fenway Pharmacy=good
Walgreens=bad
Gary Drug Co=good
Rite Aid=bad

Support your local economy and a diverse downtown!

I love local establishments, but until they can handle the demand, or loads more indies open up, the corporate entities will dominate. Of course, if Fenway Pharma got big enough to handle the demand of the city it would quickly a big corporation. Those corporate giants were little mom and pops at one point themselves.
 
Boston Herald Vs Boston Business Journal

Why Walgreens is the right Rx for Downtown Crossing

There are dissenting views on the impact of the new Walgreens in Downtown Crossing.

George Donnelly
Executive Editor-
Boston Business Journal

I thought Boston had welcomed a 25,000-square-foot super pharmacy into Downtown Crossing last week, a Walgreens on steroids.

Little did I know, until I read Paul McMorrow’s column in the Boston Globe this morning, that the new, shiny Walgreens is far more than a pharmacy that serves sushi. It symbolizes awful urban planning, a massive missed opportunity. But I dissent from his dissent. The new Walgreens is a good thing — it symbolizes investment in a neighborhood that needs it.

But that's not how some people see it, especially McMorrow. In a diatribe that is at once entertaining and bombastic, McMorrow skewers the new Walgreens as redundant, dull, and not in keeping with the coolness that is supposed to reflected by commerce that dares to plant a flag in Downtown Crossing.

“If a pharmacy that slings mediocre sushi is a sign of what’s to come from Downtown Crossing’s rebirth, the long-struggling neighborhood is headed down a very bad path,” writes McMorrow. “The bars, restaurants, coffee shops, and creative office companies” (what’s a “creative office company”?) desire “like-minded businesses” in Downtown Crossing. “Instead, they have a Walgreens, and, with it, a vision of the neighborhood that is corporate, sterile, and unimaginative.”

I would venture that most of the merchants in Downtown Crossing are happy, if not delighted, to have the Walgreens. For every allegedly cool business that McMorrow likes in the area, there are 10 more ordinary ones — jewelry stores, clothing and shoe stores, fast food restaurants — that are eager to see a little economic progress. It’s one fewer empty storefront. It puts more people to work in the neighborhood. It’s open 24 hours. It’s a positive step forward, although not a huge one.

Moreover, if city planners forced the landlord to hold out for whatever constitutes the right kind of business, the parcel would have probably stayed vacant for another two or three years. (And does the property owner, in a free enterprise system, lose his rights to lease to a prosperous, successful business like Walgreens? Or does the city get to enforce “cool business” zoning?)

One gets the sense that McMorrow, and perhaps some others, are reading too much into the new Walgreens, as if it represents a once-in-a-generation economic development opportunity. But Downtown Crossing is only in the second inning of its rebirth. There’s a lot more to come, maybe even the multi-level roller disco he called for.

McMorrow, while drinking out of a glass that is not even a quarter full, gets full credit for being provocative. For me, the new Walgreens has given me hope that I will finally be able to get a sandwich when working late on deadline. For that I’m grateful.

http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/real_estate/2013/05/walgreens-the-right-rx-for-dx.html?page=all
 
"DTC needs to do something the suburbs don't do" is a fallacious argument for at least two reasons:

1. It presupposes that people don't live or will be living in DTC who will want similar amenities as those who live in the suburbs, ignoring all evidence to the contrary (e.g. the success of the multiplex cinema, the existing number of pharmacies around)

2. It assumes there aren't things about DTC other than a few chain stores that distinguish it from the suburbs and make it a draw, e.g. density, transit access, architecture, bustle, the inevitable survival of lots of still interesting mom and pop stores between the chains, etc.

It may have made a lot more sense as an argument in 1984, when downtown still had to be a "destination" for people who lived elsewhere, rather than serving as a neighborhood for people who live there and a convenient shopping area for those living nearby.

Besides - help DTC thrive as a neighborhood again, and more interesting stores and attractions will follow.
 
^^^^

I'm calling it right now. Boston Downtown District will transform into a college area along with community condos for the yuppies no reason to ever go to Downtown crossing anymore unless you’re heading to Suffolk University or cutting through for the Boston Common, South Station or down to the theater district.

Downtown will become like every other Suburban strip mall with high end Condos. (exactly like Seaport District and North Station)

Downtown is irrelevant

How does that MODEL work for you.
 
Last edited:
McMorrow is speaking to a larger point.

He is not suggesting Meade be a retail czar.

He is suggesting the BRA could have done more to stimulate interest at this location. To take it a step further, the BRA could have done more over the past decade to stimlulate interest and activity in dozens of empty DTX storefronts.

For every one person calling attention to low ambitions (from architecture to land use) at key sites, there are always 100 on the attack. IMO, McMorrow's opinion pieces are provocative and insightful -- a break from the usual backslapping.
 
Paul McMorrow: Biggest snob in the Boston area (outside of Cambridge or Wellesley, either of which very well may be the place McMorrow calls home)?

Discuss.
 

Back
Top