Being a total outsider/ rookie to the casino business, could you help me interpret what the 1.5 x ratio means?
Does it mean that Boston's gamblers are control freaks and like to put their hands directly on "the thing" they are betting on? -- could it be interpreted as meaning that bostonians think they can beat the system by involving themselves in the process? (Is it fair to interpret the slots as "passive gaming" versus the tables as "active gaming"?)
Has the entire MIT card counting community descended upon Encore? How long before they are profiled and kicked out (of the Blackjack)
Does the casino care what the ratio of table games to slots is? Is some ratio economically ideal for the House?
Is it possible to say how Boston compares to other Massachusetts or Connecticut gaming?
The Mass Gaming Commission collects and publishes revenue information for each gaming license holder because the Commonwealth collects a 25% tax on revenue from casinos (MGM & Encore), and 49% on revenue from the slot parlor (Plainridge).
If you look at the chart from the Mass Gaming Commission, you can see MGM Springfield makes nearly 3x as much revenue from slot machines as it does from table games ($15.6M vs. $5.3M in August '19). That is similar to what you might expect or see on a similar revenue report for casinos in Las Vegas--most casinos make roughly 2x as much from slot machines as they do from table games. Encore Boston Harbor is the inverse of that pattern.
It can mean a handful of things, and frankly I think would make for a great college-level research paper (if not a Globe investigation). Encore Boston Harbor not only has a disproportionately high number of table games popular with Asians (Pai Gow, Baccarat), but also is located in an urban location with a high number of well-heeled Asian-Americans and visitors--could that have something to do with the higher revenue? Table minimums for games like Craps, Blackjack, and Roulette are routinely much higher than minimums at other casinos (like $50+ and even $100+ at the cheapest Craps table on a Saturday night)--could that be responsible for the higher table game revenue? Encore's Red Card Rewards Program gave away a lot of freeplay and free credit to Red Card holders the first couple months the casino was open--did that deflate the slot revenue for both months?
Despite the high number of slot machines (3,100+) that are at the casino, there are a lot of redundancies of machines, and I would argue a lack of diversity compared to what you would find in Connecticut and Las Vegas (Better Off Ed? King of Dragons III? GOLD GOLD GOLD? Platinum Jackpots? Nowhere). I wonder if the slots revenue is underwhelming compared to table games because the games available lack the flavor of what gamblers may be use to? It's weird to suggest, especially because the casino has been making $20M+/month from slot machines.
Boston area objectively has the most highly-educated residents of any region in the country with a major casino... maybe there's a correlation with higher-degree wielding persons spending money at table games vs. who you might find at slot machines. I don't know. Again, I think it would be a fun research project.