Fall River/New Bedford Commuter Rail (South Coast Rail)

CJ does 1115 daily boardings.
Including a not-insignificant number of sprinters--at least 2-to-3 a week, I estimate--who you'll see doing their best Usain Bolt impression (but in full work attire, with briefcase/satchel), frantically trying to surmount the station's pedestrian overpass in order to get onto the northbound side of the tracks and onto the train before the conductor signals departure... it's like watching a Tom Cruise action movie being filmed, I suppose. Some day, I'm going to start propositioning fellow passengers with odds on whether the sprinter makes it or not!
 
There was a so-called "FRA" Extra out of South Station this morning to New Bedford and return. Followed #011 to Middleboro. Made stops at Middleboro (new station), East
Taunton, Church Street/New Bedford and New Bedford. 1061 was leading along with a new Rotem Control Car. At least one of the MBTA OCS coaches (529) was in the consist.
Guess this was a final inspection/blessing trip for the FRA.
 
If the shuttles need a whole 10 minutes of buffer to time a connection, what exactly does that say about anticipated schedule adherence of SCR trains on the Old Colony? Egad. Name one first-world transit country that needs 10 whole minutes of fudge factor to do a simple cross-platform transfer.
 
If the shuttles need a whole 10 minutes of buffer to time a connection, what exactly does that say about anticipated schedule adherence of SCR trains on the Old Colony? Egad. Name one first-world transit country that needs 10 whole minutes of fudge factor to do a simple cross-platform transfer.
Does the system have timed, cross-platform transfers anywhere else? I'm not aware of any, and this is on top of just starting up basic service. The 10 minute buffer is too long, but there's no reason to believe that won't shorten once there's a better understanding of exactly how long the trips take in practice. Frankly, I'd rather the T err on the side of caution at the start of service and prove to the public that these transfers can be relied upon. If the transfers are consistently missed at the start of service, it could, at worst, prevent any future use of timed transfers throughout the system. At best, it would be just viewed as just another sign that the T can't be trusted to deliver on their promises.

I'll agree that a first-world transit agency should be better equipped to spin up a reliable cross-platform transfer with only a few minutes of buffer. But the T hasn't operated like a first-world transit agency in decades, if not generations. I'll take these baby steps over the status quo, which has been to not even try measures like this.
 
Does the system have timed, cross-platform transfers anywhere else?
There are at least two. Two Providence Line trains stop at Forest Hills in the late evening for a transfer to a Forest Hills to Needham service. I'm not sure how long a buffer there is, and they are much closer to South Station. It may or may not be a comparable ops situation, but it does mean the MBTA has at least some experience with this.
 
Does the system have timed, cross-platform transfers anywhere else?

It’s not truly cross-platform but the Franklin line has a timed transfer to the Providence at Readville to get to Back Bay/Ruggles on the weekends, and that is as short as 7 mins (and even requires some walking to get down to the Providence platform). So they definitely could get it shorter, but I agree that they’re probably being cautious for the new service - hopefully the next schedule will tighten that up.
 
Photo of the pedestrian bridge from this article:
newbedford.png
 
Does the system have timed, cross-platform transfers anywhere else? I'm not aware of any, and this is on top of just starting up basic service. The 10 minute buffer is too long, but there's no reason to believe that won't shorten once there's a better understanding of exactly how long the trips take in practice. Frankly, I'd rather the T err on the side of caution at the start of service and prove to the public that these transfers can be relied upon. If the transfers are consistently missed at the start of service, it could, at worst, prevent any future use of timed transfers throughout the system. At best, it would be just viewed as just another sign that the T can't be trusted to deliver on their promises.

I'll agree that a first-world transit agency should be better equipped to spin up a reliable cross-platform transfer with only a few minutes of buffer. But the T hasn't operated like a first-world transit agency in decades, if not generations. I'll take these baby steps over the status quo, which has been to not even try measures like this.
It was also stated in the meeting that all scheduling stuff is based off of simulated running and computer models of service that they will adjust the schedules over time with actual service. It was in response to the public Q&A segment because someone specfically asked about the overall journey time end to end.
 
This looks fantastic. With every recent project (inc. much of SCR) seemingly being value engineered, it's refreshing to see some inspired design. The bridge itself is clearly visible from 195 and is a gateway to downtown on Route 18 (the primary entrance to the city center). It's a nice, new landmark for the Whaling City.
 
Someone mentioned that SC rail would be skipping the short-turn shuttle trains on the weekends when headways are the longest. That seems frustrating. Is there any chance they could use busses on the weekends instead?
Ultimately, it would be great to use BEMU's for these short-turn shuttles... and it could probably be a very short train, one or two cars.
 
NEW BEDFORD — The new pedestrian bridge connecting downtown New Bedford to the city’s new MBTA commuter rail station may be named for World War II and Korean War veteran Army Cpl. Andre Lopes, if the City Council agrees to a proposal.

The bridge that currently spans Route 18 at Pearl Street was named for Lopes in 1977. That bridge will be demolished.
bridge.png
 
So, am I the only one who sees the present craziness in DC as a possible opportunity to get the Corps decision changed on phase two through the swamp?
 
So, am I the only one who sees the present craziness in DC as a possible opportunity to get the Corps decision changed on phase two through the swamp?
The viaduct is not the problem, electrification is. I would frankly consider the viaduct to be a good idea, swamps are valuable for the local ecosystem and for water storage, not to mention being prone to flooding by their very nature. Building the line higher up seems like a wise choice.
 
The viaduct is not the problem, electrification is. I would frankly consider the viaduct to be a good idea, swamps are valuable for the local ecosystem and for water storage, not to mention being prone to flooding by their very nature. Building the line higher up seems like a wise choice.
The main issue with the viaduct (aside from the cost) is that it's planned as a single-track viaduct instead of a double-track one. It needs to be double-tracked if they're gonna build a viaduct through the Hockomock Swamp.

The plan for Phase 2 has way too much single-track on the mainline, requiring trains to skip-stop during rush hour.
south coast rail track map.PNG
 

Back
Top