stick n move
Superstar
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2009
- Messages
- 11,883
- Reaction score
- 18,067
Including a not-insignificant number of sprinters--at least 2-to-3 a week, I estimate--who you'll see doing their best Usain Bolt impression (but in full work attire, with briefcase/satchel), frantically trying to surmount the station's pedestrian overpass in order to get onto the northbound side of the tracks and onto the train before the conductor signals departure... it's like watching a Tom Cruise action movie being filmed, I suppose. Some day, I'm going to start propositioning fellow passengers with odds on whether the sprinter makes it or not!CJ does 1115 daily boardings.
They're building a 10-minute buffer into the schedule, MBTA Chief Operating Officer Ryan Coholan said on Monday, so people taking the shuttles can catch their connecting train.
If the shuttles need a whole 10 minutes of buffer to time a connection, what exactly does that say about anticipated schedule adherence of SCR trains on the Old Colony? Egad. Name one first-world transit country that needs 10 whole minutes of fudge factor to do a simple cross-platform transfer.![]()
MBTA: Unique 'shuttle service' coming to Fall River and New Bedford. How will it work?
The MBTA said when South Coast Rail starts, Fall River and New Bedford commuters will have an extra 'shuttle service.' What is it, and how's it work?www.heraldnews.com
Does the system have timed, cross-platform transfers anywhere else? I'm not aware of any, and this is on top of just starting up basic service. The 10 minute buffer is too long, but there's no reason to believe that won't shorten once there's a better understanding of exactly how long the trips take in practice. Frankly, I'd rather the T err on the side of caution at the start of service and prove to the public that these transfers can be relied upon. If the transfers are consistently missed at the start of service, it could, at worst, prevent any future use of timed transfers throughout the system. At best, it would be just viewed as just another sign that the T can't be trusted to deliver on their promises.If the shuttles need a whole 10 minutes of buffer to time a connection, what exactly does that say about anticipated schedule adherence of SCR trains on the Old Colony? Egad. Name one first-world transit country that needs 10 whole minutes of fudge factor to do a simple cross-platform transfer.
There are at least two. Two Providence Line trains stop at Forest Hills in the late evening for a transfer to a Forest Hills to Needham service. I'm not sure how long a buffer there is, and they are much closer to South Station. It may or may not be a comparable ops situation, but it does mean the MBTA has at least some experience with this.Does the system have timed, cross-platform transfers anywhere else?
Does the system have timed, cross-platform transfers anywhere else?
It was also stated in the meeting that all scheduling stuff is based off of simulated running and computer models of service that they will adjust the schedules over time with actual service. It was in response to the public Q&A segment because someone specfically asked about the overall journey time end to end.Does the system have timed, cross-platform transfers anywhere else? I'm not aware of any, and this is on top of just starting up basic service. The 10 minute buffer is too long, but there's no reason to believe that won't shorten once there's a better understanding of exactly how long the trips take in practice. Frankly, I'd rather the T err on the side of caution at the start of service and prove to the public that these transfers can be relied upon. If the transfers are consistently missed at the start of service, it could, at worst, prevent any future use of timed transfers throughout the system. At best, it would be just viewed as just another sign that the T can't be trusted to deliver on their promises.
I'll agree that a first-world transit agency should be better equipped to spin up a reliable cross-platform transfer with only a few minutes of buffer. But the T hasn't operated like a first-world transit agency in decades, if not generations. I'll take these baby steps over the status quo, which has been to not even try measures like this.
NEW BEDFORD — The new pedestrian bridge connecting downtown New Bedford to the city’s new MBTA commuter rail station may be named for World War II and Korean War veteran Army Cpl. Andre Lopes, if the City Council agrees to a proposal.
The bridge that currently spans Route 18 at Pearl Street was named for Lopes in 1977. That bridge will be demolished.
The viaduct is not the problem, electrification is. I would frankly consider the viaduct to be a good idea, swamps are valuable for the local ecosystem and for water storage, not to mention being prone to flooding by their very nature. Building the line higher up seems like a wise choice.So, am I the only one who sees the present craziness in DC as a possible opportunity to get the Corps decision changed on phase two through the swamp?
The main issue with the viaduct (aside from the cost) is that it's planned as a single-track viaduct instead of a double-track one. It needs to be double-tracked if they're gonna build a viaduct through the Hockomock Swamp.The viaduct is not the problem, electrification is. I would frankly consider the viaduct to be a good idea, swamps are valuable for the local ecosystem and for water storage, not to mention being prone to flooding by their very nature. Building the line higher up seems like a wise choice.