Agreed, BB.
The interplay between these two buildings is overwhelmingly awkward. There's the uneasy space that opens up a few stories aboveground when the setback kicks in on building that's in the foreground in the above photo (btw, do these buildings have names or any separate identities, or will we always be referring to one or the other as "the one in the foreground/background"?).
Then there's the fact that the building in the background in the above pic has the unfortunate horitzontal panelling that screams "Welcome to the 80s!" and looks like a layer of skin shed by the Tip O'Neill Building or the Westin Copley Place. Really, what were the architects not thinking here?