themissinglink
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2018
- Messages
- 721
- Reaction score
- 2,249
Green Line Extension from Union Square to Porter Square
Last edited:
It's probably more of a pipe dream at this point. It's on everybody's radar, including the MBTA I'm sure, but it's not in any funding proposals, and there's no environmental document (EIS) done for it yet. I'd say in 15-20 years it may be approaching construction, but that's just my gut feeling. BLX to Lynn is a higher priority IMO, because Lynn has no rail rapid transit, whereas the neighborhoods between Union Sq and Porter Sq are, or soon will be, nearby rail transit.Is the GLX to Porter going to be a thing within the next few years (~10)?
Im not sure if its pipe dream, or something actually being strongly considered for down the road.
It's probably more of a pipe dream at this point. It's on everybody's radar, including the MBTA I'm sure, but it's not in any funding proposals, and there's no environmental document (EIS) done for it yet. I'd say in 15-20 years it may be approaching construction, but that's just my gut feeling. BLX to Lynn is a higher priority IMO, because Lynn has no rail rapid transit, whereas the neighborhoods between Union Sq and Porter Sq are, or soon will be, nearby rail transit.
Southside OLX starts with the Needham GLX nibbling away at the end of the Needham CR with +1/mode flips until all that's left are the Roxbury stations. Then blitz the conversion of the remaining stations. I'm not sure how much it's worth to keep the Needham line going for OLX +1's when the Needham line is eventually going away anyway.
I know there's a lot of reporting about the U.S. having sky high construction costs and I think one of the making factors that i keep on coming back to is this point. No region has a sustained capital program that keeps on building year after year. Paris, London, Tokyo, Seoul never really stop building.I want a steady stream of “small” (one or two platform) extensions just so we can keep the talent who managed the GLX in house and engaged
To me that would split Lynn into a sprint to Lynn Center and then come back later for infill.
Might mean doing Porter or California St but not the other
Throw in a “Waters Edge” on the OL (between Wellington and Malden)
Get GLX MVP done.
Figure out how to do Southside OLX in smaller bites
This graphic makes me want a Lake St/East Arlington Station.Red Line Extension to Arlington Heights
View attachment 12898
Lake was a stop on the Lexington Line at the end of Commuter Rail service in 1977...though only as a flag stop and only post-1968. It had dissapeared (along with Arlington Center) for many years in the latter-B&M era to cull the bus overlap. But there was no Alewife rail stop back then, so in that era its walkshed practically did span over the city line into North Cambridge covering all areas closer to there than to the Porter CR stop. Had CR been reinstated here for the 80's instead of mothballing the operating line the proximity of the new Alewife stop would've meant that Lake never ever would've come back on the schedule.This graphic makes me want a Lake St/East Arlington Station.
Red Line Extension to Arlington Heights
View attachment 12898
And if we can't take that on, then shame on Massachusetts. L.A. and Seattle seem to prove that multiple high impact projects can be at various phases of design and build simultaneously. If they can do it, surely we should be able to do this, too.No...pretty clearly we're going to have to ante up and build a bunch of Really Big Things™ at same/similar time lest our region's economic engine stagnates on its own self-created congestion in 15 years flat. There's no shucking that responsibility.
I want a steady stream of “small” (one or two platform) extensions just so we can keep the talent who managed the GLX in house and engaged
I know there's a lot of reporting about the U.S. having sky high construction costs and I think one of the making factors that i keep on coming back to is this point. No region has a sustained capital program that keeps on building year after year. Paris, London, Tokyo, Seoul never really stop building.
(paraphrasing) East Arlington isn’t worthwhile as a HRT station due to density, stop spacing, lack of bus connectivity, walkshed, etc
Density way lower. Everything all around is single-family homes on half-acre plots. *One* condo complex next to Spy Pond. One elementary school. Zero commercial (even the stretch of Mass Ave. closest to Lake is majority residential with few storefronts). And of course there are zero buses on Lake...they're all on Mass Ave. or the MA 2 frontages. Total uniformity...no 'clumps'.F-Line: Just for comparison sake: how would a potential East Arlington Station compare to Savin Hill Station or Shawmut Station in terms of population density, job density, population within various walksheds, bus connectivity, and stop spacing. To my eye, they seem comparable.
Here's a rather terrible presentation of the 2017 data on the density vs service overlap that supports F-Line. East Arlington is ~50% <7,000 ppsm with the rest being <20,000 with a small pocket of <40,000 (That's not a giant gap at all!). Shawmut is housed in a pocket of <20,000 with swathes of <40,000 on either side (presumably the Dot Ave and Washington St. corridors).
How did you make that map?