odurandina
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2015
- Messages
- 5,328
- Reaction score
- 265
^^This.
(from the 111 Fed thread on 5-26-2009):
i would have been kind of unthrilled by a T or L-shaped thing (also).
This parcel is tough. We know the 1 group who came up with something that was pretty good (Accordia). But, it seems with a few exceptions such as the JHT, International Place, Millennium Tower, etc, city politics/linkage + nimbyism + construction economics vs office rents/condo prices are giving rise to VE'd highrise product.
And now we've reached the point where what's left will require maxium height and density to move forward.... Just grateful the garage is getting built. btw, do you guys remember the cbt render back in 2009??
Honestly---Winthrop- Millennium tower--Is growing on me. I think its a great filler for that area. Nothing to Grande especially for that area.
(from the 111 Fed thread on 5-26-2009):
It bothers me that nothing about the irregular shape of the site is reflected in the tower's articulation. Apparently, building big in Boston requires that all designs be value-engineered in the first pass.
i would have been kind of unthrilled by a T or L-shaped thing (also).
This parcel is tough. We know the 1 group who came up with something that was pretty good (Accordia). But, it seems with a few exceptions such as the JHT, International Place, Millennium Tower, etc, city politics/linkage + nimbyism + construction economics vs office rents/condo prices are giving rise to VE'd highrise product.
And now we've reached the point where what's left will require maxium height and density to move forward.... Just grateful the garage is getting built. btw, do you guys remember the cbt render back in 2009??
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5cb7/d5cb7d2d3a7c2d849ac0bc3e4ddb1cd9a784e3ec" alt="102officetower03.jpg"
Last edited: