General MBTA Topics (Multi Modal, Budget, MassDOT)

Nothing will ever beat the "Have a 5-star day!" guy on the Red Line.

I love that guy.


There was another Red operator a few years ago who liked to mimic the stereotypical airline pilot "This is your captain speaking..." voice used all the time in TV & movies.
 
Wait - replace all the Green Line? Type 8s, sure, but why replace the Type 7s if they just got rebuilt? Shouldn't they last for a rather long time yet?

It's a 200+ car order to replace them all. And that's assuming the Type 9's are enough of a hit when they're all in-service in 2019 that they drain the option order for +30 more units...then immediately pony up for more while the factory is hot so they don't have to re-RFP and chew up another 5 years from proposal to delivery.

*Best* case scenario it's going to take till 2025-26 to churn through that many cars. Best-case. Push that out with each year it's not programmed in the CIP or if the Type 9's and CAF (who have a reputation for quality builds but veeeeeeery poor punctuality) are meh enough that it's back to the drawing board. At that point the Type 7's will be 10 years into a maximum 15-year rebuild lifespan and facing fish-or-cut-bait funding decision in the CIP on whether to retire or rebuild again. They'll be getting their full money's worth out of this rebuild program.


If the Bredas' increasing unreliability means they have to get retired first hell or high water, the Kinkis will be celebrating their 40th birthday on the back end of that replacement order. Consider that out of 8 purchase batches of PCC's that lasted into the MBTA era, the oldest ones to ever serve on punishing daily Green Line duty before retirement or light-duty reassignment to Mattapan were exactly 40 years old. The Kinkis stand a very good--and very likely--chance of being the longest-serving Green Line trains ever built. And some of them could go on to Mattapan too, since high-floor cars are fully ADA-compliant with the front-door mini-high platforms at those stops.
 
You need one low-floor car per train. The Type 7s will not be able to run with The Type 9s and future Type 10s, the Type 8s are the only low-floor cars they can trainline ith. When the Type 8s are phased out, the Type 7s will have to go with them.

The Type-9s will be low floor - or is it that they won't be able to be coupled with the Type-7s or something?
 
Are the heavy rail car operators interchangeable? Can a Red Line driver pick up a shift on the OL and vice versa? I assume the Green Line requires it's own separate crew.

Edit: I'm speaking strictly in terms of skill set. Obviously, work rules dictate how the crew members are assigned.
 
It's a 200+ car order to replace them all. And that's assuming the Type 9's are enough of a hit when they're all in-service in 2019 that they drain the option order for +30 more units...then immediately pony up for more while the factory is hot so they don't have to re-RFP and chew up another 5 years from proposal to delivery.

*Best* case scenario it's going to take till 2025-26 to churn through that many cars. Best-case. Push that out with each year it's not programmed in the CIP or if the Type 9's and CAF (who have a reputation for quality builds but veeeeeeery poor punctuality) are meh enough that it's back to the drawing board. At that point the Type 7's will be 10 years into a maximum 15-year rebuild lifespan and facing fish-or-cut-bait funding decision in the CIP on whether to retire or rebuild again. They'll be getting their full money's worth out of this rebuild program.


If the Bredas' increasing unreliability means they have to get retired first hell or high water, the Kinkis will be celebrating their 40th birthday on the back end of that replacement order. Consider that out of 8 purchase batches of PCC's that lasted into the MBTA era, the oldest ones to ever serve on punishing daily Green Line duty before retirement or light-duty reassignment to Mattapan were exactly 40 years old. The Kinkis stand a very good--and very likely--chance of being the longest-serving Green Line trains ever built. And some of them could go on to Mattapan too, since high-floor cars are fully ADA-compliant with the front-door mini-high platforms at those stops.

Will miss the Kinkis when they are retired, but that makes sense that even with the rebuild it would be another decade+ before a new order large enough would replace them. I was thinking about them on the high speed line the other day (as I waited for 20 minutes again out bound) that they would be nice and might allow a bigger fleet/better rush hour headways/less crowding than the PCCs, but, I would also be pretty bummed to see the PCCs get completely phased out. Maybe the Type-7s during peak hours, with the PCCs thrown in on weekends/off hours would be cool.
 
I ride the green line almost daily. I realize there's some political crap (re: privatization, in house rework, etc) surrounding the Kinkis' rebuild, but I have to say that rebuild looks absolutely fantastic. I prefer to ride in a re-built Type-7 than a Type-8. The new interior lighting is fantastic, and the detailed work (at least aesthetically) is top-notch. Clearly I can't speak from an operator's perspective, but from a passenger's perspective it's quite nice. You can see new brakes and other features gleaming as well.
 
Be careful what you wish for. The Blue Line cars--next-newest on the system--are incredibly chatty with all the superfluous and long-winded bus announcements at every stop. Frank really starts getting on your nerves after 7 or 8 stops.

Jesus Christ you guys would hate the Tokyo metro where each of the core stops have 6 or 7 lines running through them and they announce all of them.
 
The Type-9s will be low floor - or is it that they won't be able to be coupled with the Type-7s or something?

The 24 Type 9s will be low floor. They however are not being designed with control systems that can operate with a Type 7 or Type 8, although they will be able to mechincally couple to be able to push or tow. The desire was for the Type 9s to have a more advanced control system which would not be held back by a requirment to be compatible with older cars.

There is an option to buy 30 more Type 9s, but there are no plans to exercise the option at this point. Instead, the plan is to eventually order a 220 car fleet of Type 10s to replace both the Type 7s and Type 8s at the same time. The goal of the Type 10 is to design a car that is as close to 100% low-floor as possible, while still being able to couple to older cars to tow or push if required. At this point, the Type 9s are already intended to be a small orphan fleet.

Because of the requirement for one low-floor car per train, it means that for each Type 8 retired as the future Type 10s arrive, a Type 7 will have to be retired as well. It will not be possible to retire all the Type 8s first and then all the Type 7s, because that would mean Type 7s would have to operate together in trains without a low-floor car. While in practice the occational train of two Type 7s runs now, it cannot be a policy to set up a scenario where running two Type 7s without a low-floor car in the train would be an acceptable practice.
 
Jesus Christ you guys would hate the Tokyo metro where each of the core stops have 6 or 7 lines running through them and they announce all of them.

It happens in the NYC subway also...look at all the intersecting lines at Times Square or Union Square. These announcements serve a purpose: to inform passengers of all available subway connections.

As for the MBTA, however, what purpose does playing a ding-dong before every announcement and announcing "bus connections" at every stop serve? It's borderline noise pollution. And don't get me started on the recent change to the Green Line announcements where they've spliced a low quality and out-of-place "bus connections" into Frank's original recordings...
 
Will miss the Kinkis when they are retired, but that makes sense that even with the rebuild it would be another decade+ before a new order large enough would replace them. I was thinking about them on the high speed line the other day (as I waited for 20 minutes again out bound) that they would be nice and might allow a bigger fleet/better rush hour headways/less crowding than the PCCs, but, I would also be pretty bummed to see the PCCs get completely phased out. Maybe the Type-7s during peak hours, with the PCCs thrown in on weekends/off hours would be cool.

There aren't enough people at the T trained on servicing PCC's, so they'll have to go unless they're rebuilt again with modern components under the same shell. In which case they wouldn't really be PCC's anymore. But they're in great condition for their age and rebuildable one more time with aftermarket parts supply if it comes to that, so every single one of them will live on at heritage operations where they have the in-house bandwidth for their gearheads to tend to this stuff. San Fran would definitely pony up $$$ to add them to the F Market fleet, since they're expanding the reach of the historic cars. Different priorities. If the T is on a long-term plan for big fleet increases on Green to feed linear expansion and capacity expansion via 3-car trains, the shops need to be laser-like focused on maintaining maximal scale of their most-modern fleets.

Not like they have a choice with how much shit is hitting the fan this month over severe understaffing...and severe understaffing of the very hiring managers who have to plug the severely understaffed front line. No room for nostalgia when they've got such a long, long climb out of that hole.


The other intriguing PCC option sitting under the radar is keeping them instate by sending them to Lowell. There's been all sorts of conceptual plans for expanding the for-show Canal trolley into more of a real-deal Kenosha Streetcar-type system around all the new development there, with loop built at the commuter rail station to make it a true rapid transit operation. In-state fleet of 10 PCC's would be absolutely perfect to transfer there if The Mill City went all-in on taking the Canal district bigtime.

----------

While the Type 7's are pretty much as immortal as the PCC's if taken care of, the limiting factor for any long-term future is that they will be the last cars left anywhere on the T that still use DC traction motors. Bredas, Red 01800's, Blue 0700's, the new Orange + Red cars, the Cambridge trackless trolleys, and the Silver Line dual-modes all use AC motors, which are simpler to maintain. Everything built from mid-1990's on is AC, so DC motors are fully obsolete technology. Even on mainline rail...AC propulsion on everything less than 20 years old. So while secondhand parts for the DC cars are so abundant that a 70-year-old PCC can live forever...it's going to be a P.I.T.A. for the shops to have to service the more labor-intensive old components and retain staff that can do it when it's just a small minority of the fleet. That's where the Type 7's are staring at mechanical obsolescence after this rebuild cycle.

Now, they can easily set aside the much younger and smaller 3700 series fleet for Mattapan, conversions into extra work cars, and a couple stored remainders to raid for parts. They're still fresh enough that low-impact duty will keep them very light on maint needs for another Mattapan generation. Especially since they won't need to trainline as 2-car trains out there; the trainlining sync-up puts more wear on the components than running solo. 50th birthday under a T logo is not at all far-fetched for a subset of Kinki remainders.

----------

As for the replacement sequence...well, that's still a long ways away. And a lot has already changed in the 10 months since that fleet plan presentation was given. Namely, the herpes outbreak of new Breda derailments (Oct. FCMB presentation): http://www.mbta.com/uploadedfiles/About_the_T/Board_Meetings/G. Green Line Derailments -TO POST.pdf. ADA, trainlining, whatever...if in 2022 the Bredas can't stay on the rails and out of the Riverside dead line, they'll do what they have to do to survive. Even if that means going to battle with the non-ADA army they have. Both the most recent commuter rail and bus orders had the order-of-retirement resequenced mid- and late-delivery because the snapshot of best-to-worst condition vehicles in the active fleet changed plans. The new normal for 21st c. transit procurements is minimum 5 years from RFP to delivery. Much longer when it's an extremely large order, as this monster procurement will be. Elasticity of incumbent fleet's uptime becomes hard to predict 5 years in advance, the stuff of wild guesses and hopeful optimism when it's in excess of 8 years. Especially when it involves replacements of vehicles with already dodgy reliability years before the clock even starts ticking on that 5-year paperwork-to-delivery gestation period for the replacements. We're painfully finding out with commuter rail right now how much fleet plan predictions can whiff when attrition rates don't play out in nicely linear fashion...and instead fall off a sudden cliff.

If it comes down to a worst-case of having to get rid of a shot Bredas fleet first and take a temporary hit on ADA with 7-7 consists, they'll do what they have to do to survive. Nobody's going to sue or fine them on accessibility grounds for that when the alternative--temporary service cuts--is a much worse loss of accessibility than having to grit it out month-to-month for a couple years. They have means of gerrymandering around that to minimize the sting. They can start throwing their dwindling Bredas in 7-8-7 triplet sandwiches and run 9-9 deuces or whatever until supply of Bredas is sufficiently exhausted. Then they can triage an artful combo of real-time tracking + very careful dispatching + special stop announcements to tell riders that the 9-9 consist 3 minutes behind this 7-7 train will be wheelchair-accessible and please pardon the inconvenience. Riders will understand that it's very short-term if the communication is good. And probably be more thrilled that the Bredas are gone than truly inconvenienced.

So on the range of options from "Good. We're all set to retire 1 Kinki for every Breda" to "Bad. The Bredas aren't roadworthy enough to last till the end of the order; we have to front-load", they'll have their full spectrum of scenarios stepped out well before this ungodly large funding commitment ever hits the CIP.
 
Last edited:
Train people to run a PCC?

We're almost in 2017.

Slap on some Tesla magic and have them run automated.
 
Train people to run a PCC?

We're almost in 2017.

Slap on some Tesla magic and have them run automated.

Honestly I think a PCC-2 rebuild (all modern, keep the shells) and using it as a track bed for full automation/syncing to Ashmont would be the awesome way to go for the Mattapan plan. While I get they really wont be PCCs anymore - I think it still keeps the spirit of 'em even with the new internals. Seems at least it might be useful to the T to try out a more automated system on other lines. Either way - I will be sad to see the day that both the PCCs are gone and Type-7s, even if it is a ways-away. Also too bad the T can't get a real heritage line going like SF.
 
Train people to run a PCC?

We're almost in 2017.

Slap on some Tesla magic and have them run automated.

They're not hard to service, but there also isn't anything resembling an instruction manual anymore after so many rebuilds and modifications. And old cars can be temperamental. The 10 in Mattapan were drawn from 2 different manufacturing batches, rebuilt different ways in the 70's and 80's with little consistency in rebuild methods, and each unit has its own little quirks in how it handles. You have to have enough natural intuition for what's going on under the hood and how it all fits together to service them without introducing any hiccups. Most shop employees who work on the Mattapan cars learned by watching somebody else work on each of the cars. It's not something you can do with repetitive tasks specced from a service manual. Put somebody on the PCC's who's only serviced Bredas and Kinkis where Breda and Kinki service & support is always a phone call away when they're stumped, and it's going to be one "Mommy, help" phone call to Seashore Trolley Museum after another. Because you can do something totally by-the-book but get the car behaving unexpectedly because it developed its own individualized quirks through 7 decades. Like...replace some relay from the controls to the propulsion and all of a sudden have the car take off like a rocket at slightest touch on the accelerator. Stuff like that which you have to pound into shape with adjustments by-feel.

Deal with historic cars all day and you get familiar with those quirks. Deal with 200 modern and rebuilt-modern cars all day and it can throw somebody for a loop that a unit can have such a strong "personality" deviating from the norm which you have to accommodate. The systems that have the maint bandwidth to deal with this can use old-timey cars infinitely and school infinite generations of shop staff on them. This system just doesn't have that luxury anymore when they're so strapped for bodies, and so much of their time is sucked up tending to aches and pains on state-of-the-art new crap that's...uh...crap.
 
The 10 remaining PCC cars at Mattapan are from one large order for 225 cars delivered in 1944-46. The order had propulsion systems split between two suppliers (Westinghouse and GE), and brake systems split between cars equipped with tread-brakes and cars with drum brakes. 34 cars of these 225 cars were rebuilt in 1976-83. All of the cars chosen to be rebuilt were Westinghouse equipped cars with drum brakes. The 10 cars that remain from that group of 34 were rebuilt again in 1999-2005. Both rebuilding programs included a complete strip down to the frame and a rewiring. Repairpersons at Mattapan have all come from working at Riverside, the people who pick work at Mattapan are usually those who prefer working at a small isolated facility. It has been over 30 years since the PCC fleet was reduced just to the 10 cars at Mattapan, an entire generation of repairpersons have come and gone. The problem with maintaining the PCC fleet is not a shortage of knowledge on the cars, it is a shortage of parts. The three cars that are out of service at Mattapan long term (one since 2009) are not out of service because nobody knows how to fix them, they are out because certain key components are hard to find and expensive to replicate. A third rebuild of these cars is not out of the question, since it is clear the community has little enthusiasm for any type of rubber-tired replacement and it would still be less expensive than the maintenance facility, power, and bridge upgrades that would be required for newer cars. If rebuilt, the MBTA will have to decide between the approach taken by MUNI (rebuild the cars with rebuilt original PCC equipment) or the approach taken by SEPTA and now EL Paso (rebuild the cars with solid state non-PCC controls). Given the existing difficulty in obtaining parts for air-brake cars (MUNI uses all-electric cars that use different parts), the preference may be for new control systems. MUNI would not be interested in acquiring the Boston cars. They have had opportunities to buy other Boston cars in the past and have declined, they do not want cars with air-brakes. The Seashore Trolley Museum has claimed they don’t want anymore Boston PCCs since they already have 19, and none of the them has been kept in operating condition (one car, 3127, has been cosmetically maintained for display). PCC cars, while simple compared to modern LRVs, are much more complex than the pre-PCC era equipment found at most museums. There are a lot of “preserved” PCC cars at museums, but the number maintained in operating condition is small. Since the cars at Mattapan are single-ended and require loops, it also seems unlikely they would be a good match for any expansion in Lowell, which requires double-ended cars.

The Breda Type 8s have similar issues as far as parts go. Most of the 10 cars out of service long-term at Riverside are not cars with derailment or collision damage (with one exception), they are cars that had a component failure and no replacement parts in stock to replace at the time of the failure. Once one part was robbed, others were taken and what started as a car out of service because of one failure becomes a car out of service missing multiple parts that are hard to keep in stock. THE MBTA’s fleet plan and the CIP include a proposed project to spend close to $40 million for a Breda reliability improvement program. That essentially translates to buying replacement components for ones that are difficult to find and/or have high failure rates. The cars have had a lot of issues with leaks from the hydraulic brake system. One test car has been extensively modified to improve the hydraulic system and is a pilot to modify the Type 8s fleet wide.

Five of the 11 Type 8 derailments since January 2015 took place before the fleet plan document was released in January 2016, it is not a new issue that was unknown when the plan was compiled and it is unlikely it will change the fleet plan. The response to the derailments will be the same as it was in 2003, get back into the habit of routine rail grinding, and be prepared to change out wheels on the center section (C trucks) of Type 8s at a more frequent rate as they show signs of wear.

When making the case to the Control Board for funding for a 220-car Type 10 order, the Control Board is unlikely to approve a plan that would retire Type 8s quickly while sacrificing accessibility agreements for an extended period. No matter how much more reliable the Type 7s are than the Type8s, the one low-floor car per train requirement will dominate the decision on a retirement schedule for the combined fleet. Finding the money to pay for it will of course dominate the decision on when a procurement actually moves forward.
 
Pour one out for BU West

They formally axed it?

High-Five.png


FINALLY!
 
Pretty sure 2 of the BU stops are gone to make room for the new bike lanes. Can't wait for a news piece on how evil cyclists are even attacking the T now
 
Pretty sure 2 of the BU stops are gone to make room for the new bike lanes. Can't wait for a news piece on how evil cyclists are even attacking the T now

Doubt it, no one wanted those stops to remain. Not BU, not BU students, not the T, not the rest of the riders on the line. Pretty much everyone is onboard with getting rid of them I think.
 
The real story is how barrier-free fare collection is good for everyone: speeding boarding, making better use of platform space, facilitating stop consolidation (fewer, bigger, faster stops), and getting better use out of all capital infrastructure, vehicles and street-space.
 

Back
Top