That's exactly what politicians do. The tipoff is that their lips are moving. If you don't have a Full Funding Agreement, you don't have promise that you can expect follow through on. {anyone who made their own, personal "master plan" for a home in Somerville or Medford expecting the Green Line by 2007, or 2009, or 2011 or 2014, or 2017 or 2020 knows how this goes, and it takes sustained political pressure reciprocated by political will}
Dear MGH: Just because one of your Uncles promised you a Red-Blue pony for your birthday, doesn't mean Mommy and I are going to give you one. Throw a tantrum to express the terrible disappointment, but don't expect it to change what you get. Now, if you'd like to take some money out of savings and we can work out a plan to house and feed the thing, maybe we can make this work.
Oh, come on. The state goes encouraging them full-tilt for years on end to build their master plan around enhanced transit access, then heads for the hills and scuttles the project...then starts engaging in verbal diarrhea about maybe there being a little bit of transit
loss instead. And this is MGH's fault for being suckers because they coulda/shoulda/woulda known how the game is played?
The city and state embedded themselves in with MGH selling it all on how it very much wasn't a game...so it's a game and "Nyah-nyah, you lose! Cry me a river!" C'mon, Arlington...you know that's a flippant and simplistic way to dismiss this. Stating one's displeasure at being played is not the same as throwing a tantrum...and MGH did not take hostages, make threats, or gum up the works with anything. When somebody presents themselves as a serious embedded partner a little more involved than pols idly flapping their ass cheeks there's an voluntary transaction of trust. Why should large businesses have any trust in a transportation partnership when the T, Governor, Mayor, and BRA have no compunctions about fucking over the trust of one of the largest businesses in town. They're damn lucky New Balance is even making a serious offer of anything. The state and city have done a fine job ensuring no one else has enough trust in them to stick their necks out.
You want public-private partnerships...solve for the problem of openly discouraging public-private partnerships with this pattern of cut-and-run behavior. We're not exactly making encouraging progress on that front throughout this city, based on all those awesome developer/MassDOT/BRA air rights joints that are also popping up like weeds over the Pike at breathtaking pace.
Matthew said:
I can hardly blame any private company for not wanting to sink money into a PPP until we figure out how to get these ridiculously ballooning infrastructure costs under control.
Suppose they commit $100m towards a $500m project (to pick some numbers) and then the state comes back with "oopsie, gonna cost $1 billion and delayed 5 years" a few years later. And then again, and again, like with East Side Access (scheduled to open 2009!).
At least those transit stations that were funded privately, or partially-so, were fairly self-contained projects
This too. I'm not sure what in there is for the private entity anyway on a build that is nothing but tunneling under a public street and linking a rather barebones island platform with the current station at virtually zero structural change to the current station. The only surface-level changes at all are that that pronounced bulge at the back of the fare lobby would have 1 elevator and a low-profile up/down escalator popping up through the tile in front of that emergency exit to the circle where the flower vendor sets up shop. That and modified signage are literally it. What exactly would any MGH fun bucks do to help when most of the work touching other people's stuff involves NStar and Comcast utility relocation and City of Boston water/sewer mains. There's nothing to partner on. It's not like those kinds of things work on the premise of a charitable donation to the MassDOT general fund. You have to have a project where there's something the private entity can actually...like,
do...to deliver some component of the project. They don't have jurisdiction over the pipes under Cambridge St. and the bedrock that has to be cut up below in order to pop that little escalator into the Charles ground lobby.
So why did they run their mouths at MGH for so long when this wasn't that kind of project in the first place, and the encouragement and expectations they were offering MGH weren't necessary as a solicitation for help?
To be clear, this was way more than the T. Menino was as culpable as anyone at over-pressing the flesh then screening his phone calls when it all started drying up.