They are currently laying a large-diameter drain pipe under the future CR side of the right of way. It is possible that the inlets to it are currently blocked/cut-off by construction.
It was meant to be tongue-in-cheek. The flooding was gone by days end and this was a couple of weeks ago now. But I read that quote from you Arlington and I loved the juxtaposition of the photo (from Cedar St. looking north at Ball Square for those who are unfamiliar).They have installed bypasses for the segments under construction, but they are vastly undersized for the storms we had recently.
It does raise the question of how their calculations show the pathetic SCR Phase 1 having a 50% fare recovery ratio while GLX only having 2.3%, something seems off there. I refuse to believe that SCR will be more profitable than GLX for very long.
This seems like a very myopic way of looking at this. More often than not you see these projects getting far higher ridership once they open. That, and the development it will bring will add riders over time.
And this is exactly why it's not a good success metric. For GLX, the success comes in moving the same (or slightly higher) number of people more efficiently. To financially quantify that, we'd need to look at the cost to each rider of spending more time on the 'T.The big deal is that most potential GLX riders are already transit users, so it won't bring in new much new revenue. But this isn't assuming changes in bus service. Or, as van mentioned, additional development.
The Secretary is right, and it's another way besides what I suggest above to think about this. Operating a light rail line is less expensive per rider than the buses it will displace.Pollack suggested that instead of just looking at the new revenue/new expenses per project, a better framing would be to look at the expected revenues and costs for each line/mode before and after each project. I think that makes sense since it show that the Green Line won't have a pitiful fare recovery ratio (but the 88 probably will).
I'd taken it at quasi-face value since I'd remembered reading something a couple years ago about the T studying the costs and revenues from the green line extension and it was projected to lose a lot of money. Turns I was right, but those numbers didn't agree with what they're saying now:That $1M figure is utterly incorrect. I'm not sure if it's an error or a fake, but it's bunk.
The FEIR predicted 7,900 new linked trips (i.e. 4,000 new transit riders) from the GLX. (I think that's rather low, but we'll run with that.) If we assume everyone uses a monthly (pay-as-you-go will roughly balance out discounted passes), that's $4.3M in new revenue per year. And that's pretty much the low-end estimate that ignores things like the fact that those buses could potentially be carrying a lot of new riders.
My personal guess is that number is supposed to be $11 million, which puts the farebox recovery ratio for the change in service around 25%. That's not terrible for a project that's improving service for a lot of existing riders. Given the ridership density expected for the stations, the GLX will probably outperform the ~40% overall farebox recovery ratio for the Green Line.
Meanwhile, the ridership projections for SCR have been ridiculously inflated for many years now.
John Dalton, the T manager overseeing the Green Line Extension, said the operating costs on the new stretch of track from Lechmere into Somerville and Medford will be $26 million a year, partially offset by fare revenue of $3 million a year.
I've been wondering that too. Hard frost this morning and they're still digging to place that storm drain line and drilling for retaining walls and sound walls.It doesn't seem like they are really all that close to being able to lay CR track on that side, or am I misinterpreting the photos?
I believe the piers to the left side of the photos (that do not yet have steel on them) are the Medford branch. The bridge that curves up and then left is the flying split towards Union. The branch to the right will go to the yard.Is that split on photos 5 and 7 where the Union branch will split off?