I wonder why they did the temporary asphalt sidewalk in the first photo.
Is a 7' chain-link fence really necessary, or is that temporary?
Why not just a 42" tube railing. Something that looks at least somewhat intentional instead of just an afterthought...
yea, great that this is open but the high fence is a bit extreme. What's the thinking behind that, are they worried about people chucking crap at passing cars?Is a 7' chain-link fence really necessary, or is that temporary?
Why not just a 42" tube railing. Something that looks at least somewhat intentional instead of just an afterthought...
I bet there are rules for how high a path is above a road, or how close to a road before you need chain link (picturing a lot of paths-over-streets bridges, such as the Minuteman's bridges over little streets in Arlington, including this one, which has both a tall fence on the bike bridge above, and chain link on the "high sidewalk" on the sidesyea, great that this is open but the high fence is a bit extreme. What's the thinking behind that, are they worried about people chucking crap at passing cars?
Did any of you actually use this underpass before? This is light-years better, although I do wish that they had shifted the bike lane to the pedestrian level and added a small staircase on this side of the road to the community path. For historical reference...Washington st View attachment 8361View attachment 8362underpass sidewalk open
I would just ride my bike on the sidewalk under the bridge. It's plenty wide enough......I do wish that they had shifted the bike lane to the pedestrian level ...
I think some of those are from two months ago