The EGE
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2013
- Messages
- 1,625
- Reaction score
- 4,083
Two types of futureproofing, a bit confusing.
All GLX platforms are designed to be raised to 14 inches above top of rail, to allow level boarding on Type 9 and Type 10 cars once the 7s and 8s are gone. (The folding doors on the older cars would hit the higher platforms.)
All (save already-long Lechmere) are being built to 225', sufficient for two-car Type 10 trains or three-car trains of current stock. They are also designed to be extended to 300'. That's unlikely to be needed, given that 225' is sufficient for the Type 10s; it may have been a decision made before it was firmly decided to have the Type 10s be longer than the current LRVs. I have some discussion about platform sizes in Appendix H of my thesis. My argument there is that 225' should be the standard platform size; anything longer will require some very difficult modifications at some older stations, while not providing any real benefit.
All GLX platforms are designed to be raised to 14 inches above top of rail, to allow level boarding on Type 9 and Type 10 cars once the 7s and 8s are gone. (The folding doors on the older cars would hit the higher platforms.)
All (save already-long Lechmere) are being built to 225', sufficient for two-car Type 10 trains or three-car trains of current stock. They are also designed to be extended to 300'. That's unlikely to be needed, given that 225' is sufficient for the Type 10s; it may have been a decision made before it was firmly decided to have the Type 10s be longer than the current LRVs. I have some discussion about platform sizes in Appendix H of my thesis. My argument there is that 225' should be the standard platform size; anything longer will require some very difficult modifications at some older stations, while not providing any real benefit.