Returning to this thread to toss out a pure "crayoning delight" idea that isn't so much a proposal as a thought experiment to examine our transit needs from a novel perspective.
Basically, take F-Line's brilliant "Red X" idea, and reroute one of the now duplicative segments over to the Seaport:
There are a few pieces to this and I was slightly surprised when I realized that some are not actually that crazy:
- Not (that) crazy:
- Reuse the Piers Transitway tunnel: IIRC, this tunnel was indeed built to Red Line specifications. I've relocated the Seaport station to one that is between Courthouse and WTC, in part to reflect HRT stop spacing, but it isn't a hugely consequential decision
- Reclaim the full Track 61 ROW (including the Haul Road) for below-grade open-trench HRT running (see map below)
- This, by the way, is my response to pretty much any Track 61 proposal: you need somewhere for it to go after reaching the Seaport; usually I figure on BRT that heads east to the airport, but here I've flipped it to run west
- Actually crazy:
- Complete rebuild of South Station Under, as the Seaport line would need to diverge west of the existing Red Line platforms if it is going to pick up the Transitway tunnel; if God is footing the bill, you could of course do a greenfield tunnel that splits off just east of the platforms
- Some sort of tunnel under the Mass Pike to connect Seaport Station and the Track 61 ROW. I have zero clue what this would entail, but I have to think it would be a massive undertaking
A more complete map (not shown is the connection just south of Andrew between the Seaport Line and the Congress Line, where the Cabot yard tracks split off today):
There are two concepts at play here, one of which is already covered as part of the Red-X idea.
First, reallocating the Dorchester Ave subway to the Congress Subway creates a pretty maximally straight north-south axis that makes for pretty elegant network design. (I'd argue this is one area where this idea has a slight edge over the original Red-X, which sees the Congress Line bypassing Andrew -- which isn't a knock on that proposal, it's just an area of slightly reduced elegance.)
Second, the current Red Line -- like all of Boston's subway routes -- consists of radial legs that meet in downtown at an angle. (Compare the north-south alignment of Oak Grove-Tufts Medical Center and the northeast-southwest alignment of Tufts Medical-Forest Hills.) This concept maintains that topology but relocates the curving angle from South Station to the Seaport. This, I would argue, takes the same logic that created today's Red Line and updates it for the 21st century: the Red Line turns at South Station because that once was the edge of the CBD; now that the CBD extends into the Seaport, the turn should also be relocated again toward the edge of the CBD.
Now... what would
really make this concept sing would be to have the Seaport Line travel via D Street rather than Track 61. That would allow for better service deeper into South Boston, and additionally would allow you to swing wider through the Seaport, serving WTC more directly, and probably giving you space to fit two stations into the Seaport rather than one.
The "problem" with that, of course, is that it would be huge greenfield construction. Which, again, isn't a problem if God is footing the bill, and so is useful to bear in mind when considering what an "ideal" system might look like, and thereby where we should be "aiming" for with our compromises.
~~~
Now, what might make for a slightly less "If You Were God" proposal would be something like the below...
An Aldgate junction north of South Station, connecting the Transitway to a second LRT trunk through downtown via Congress St. Seaport can get high frequencies from both the north and the south, and additional capacity opens up to funnel services from Nubian, Back Bay, Huntington and beyond into downtown without touching the Central Subway. Vaguely feasible in that it shouldn't require a rebuild of South Station Under (although that many flat junctions might be unpleasant, potentially necessitating a grade-separation rebuild of the Transitway -- less feasible).
I don't think this is particularly necessary or desirable -- if you're going to bring LRT to South Station, it should continue on to the Seaport. A trunk under Congress is nice, but I think is overkill, and requires an Aldgate junction if you want to keep frequencies maximal within each of the trunks (Congress, Seaport, Hudson St). I think a Congress subway is better allocated to HRT or mainline service, rather than LRT.
But it looks pretty on the map!