Charlie_mta
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2006
- Messages
- 4,322
- Reaction score
- 5,935
It wouldn't take much to demo it. From its looks, a strong wind could blow that pos away.When does the demo start?
It wouldn't take much to demo it. From its looks, a strong wind could blow that pos away.When does the demo start?
There's a thin-ness to the Whoop's façade that makes it seem transient. Like they could easily rip it down and reskin the building if a different tenant wanted it.
Why do they keep coming up with these cheap crappy claddings? Yeah, I know....$$$$$. But still, a little creativity could produce something better within the budget they have.If the sampler is a true indication of what the finished product is going to be I'm very worried.
If the sampler is a true indication of what the finished product is going to be I'm very worried.
The Whoops building in all its glaring orange-ness at sunset. The pinkish color it has during the day is a bit subdued here by the orange light, which makes it slightly less hideous, but still ugly and cheap nonetheless.
The Whoops building in all its glaring orange-ness at sunset. The pinkish color it has during the day is a bit subdued here by the orange light, which makes it slightly less hideous, but still ugly and cheap nonetheless.
IMG_0395 by Bos Beeline, on Flickr
Not the worst, but if that's the metric by which a new building is permitted at an iconic location, then we're screwed.As bad as the brick is and the Whoop sign is, the people shitting on it are worse. It sucks but it’s there. And is it the worst building in the Fenway?