Do we know what planes they'll have flying these routes?
As far as I know, they only fly 787s for their long haul routes. Don't see why this would be any different.
Do we know what planes they'll have flying these routes?
As far as I know, they only fly 787s for their long haul routes. Don't see why this would be any different.
British Airways responds to the new Gatwick flights:
"British Airways responded robustly to the challenge from Norwegian. BA said: 'From May 2016, when the Norwegian flights begin, our cheapest return flights will be £603."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/t...Boston-ll-quick-26-people-flight-buy-one.html
Everyone wins when Norwegian comes to town.
They're going to have to do better than that. That's still $945 at today's exchange rate. Virgin and Delta are in the low $800 range for the same timeframe, while Norweigan is in the high $600 range.
Better than paying 1350 as some had this summer.
I personally believe 8-900 is a fair rate for nonstop Boston-London but when its cheaper to go to Dubai, Beijing or Hong Kong it makes you scratch your head.
Air fares have always been hard to explain
There was a period of time -- a few years before the TSA Era when a Non Stop or a 1 Stop to LA was cheaper than a flight to Chicago
So if you wanted to go to Chicago you arranged for a flight to/from LA with a change in Chicago -- then you dumped the rest of the ticket
This became so popular that first brokerages got set up who bought the unused ticket segments and resold them at a discount
As computing became more capable the airlines figured this out and started to do more weird pricing on their own
There's support for direct Boston-Hawaii flights
Aug 28, 2015, 7:13am EDT
In an informal poll taken Thursday of 1,100 visitor industry leaders at Hawaii's annual tourism conference, a direct Massachusetts-Hawaii link received the most support out of any domestic route.
According to our sister paper, the Pacific Business News:
Among domestic routes, the demand for a direct flight between Boston and Hawaii drew 40 percent of the vote. Orlando, Florida; Philadelphia and St. Louis trailed behind after receiving 22 percent, 14 percent and 17 percent of the total votes, respectively.
Whether that route eventually takes shape is another story.
If only HNL were a hub on the way to someplace. Though if BOS-TLV can work, you'd think BOS-HNL would.Ready for Non-stop to Hawaii 50
http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/b...support-for-direct-boston-hawaii-flights.html
If only HNL were a hub on the way to someplace. Though if BOS-TLV can work, you'd think BOS-HNL would.
If only HNL were a hub on the way to someplace. Though if BOS-TLV can work, you'd think BOS-HNL would.
Dunno, but Australia is basically the only "big" destination for which HNL would be a legit connection, meaning that an attempted hub in HNL would lose as an Asia-Pacific hub to LAX, DTW, or ORD, all of which are basically directly on the great circle route (and LAX + DFW already have Qantas service)How much Boston-Australia traffic is there?
How much Boston-Australia traffic is there?
I don't have hard numbers, but multiple people on airliners.net have said that Boston is one of the largest feeders into DFW-SYD.
Boston does damn well considering that it depends mostly on individual international airlines flying in and out of the city.