@Beton Brut, I can't speak for everyone, but personally I'd say it's because I haven't seen an anti-casino argument yet that didn't come of as either a) garden variety NIMBY-sim or b) Cary Nation Neo-Prohibitionism.
There's nothing "garden variety" about my opposition to this proposal, or to the expanded gambling legislation. Have you read the legislation? Have you considered the legislation's implications to the Lottery? Are you of the opinion that Massachusetts, a state with a rich history of political patronage and corruption, can do this "right?" And, in a few years, when it turns into a fiscal shit-show, who cleans it up? The casinos, or the taxpayers?
the only part of their program which I think is soft so far is how to deal with the transportation issues and also why is the hotel so small. Although I don't think that if this thing is as successful as could be -- there can always be more rooms added in a second hotel on the complex
Use your head Westy -- the hotel is small because no sensible person would consider this site a "resort." Note that the site-plan omits the oil tank farm. This is a "convenience" casino. Consider:
Why do casino operators and the public officials who support them cling to the “destination resort” message? Because the frame polls well, significantly better than describing it accurately as casinos and slot parlors. The public conjures nice restaurants, golf courses and high-end retail as opposed to the most predatory business in America.
There are two different kinds of markets that determine the main difference in customers. Here’s the money quote from former Harrah's Atlantic City executive Dave Jonas, who recently helped launch Parx Casino just outside of Philly in Bensalem, PA (source: Jackpot:
Harrah’s Winning Secrets for Customer Loyalty by Robert Shook, pg. 108-109)
“Industry people talk about the categories of Indian gaming, riverboats and land-based casinos, but it really boils down to being either destination resorts or frequency markets. Atlantic City is a frequency market and we attract frequency customers. These customers come 40 to 50 times a year (in 2011 at Parx it’s 200 times - Les) and stay four hours to 1.2 days. On the other hand, Las Vegas and Lake Tahoe are destination resorts, whose customers stay four to six days. Consequently, both kinds of customers have totally different spending habits. In Vegas, for example, they spend more money on food and will spend $100 on a show ticket without blinking an eye. In Atlantic City, people don’t like to spend $10 to see a show. They expect it to be free. They’ll play $150 to $200 in a four-hour period and they’re gone. In Vegas, it might take four days to get that same money from a customer. There are few similarities between destination resorts and frequency markets.”
Source, Les Bernal
Beton -- I think some of the architecture is an "homage" to the 1930's original Suffolk Downs grandstand complex and of course its David Manfredi.
In form, the hotel calls to mind one of Wright's
Solar Hemicycle homes with a case of extreme giantism.
An unsolicited suggestion -- with all that glass -- offer to build the and maintain the gardern under glass for the Mass Horticultureal Society which was supposed to be located where the occupyers were squatting
Why would a multinational corporation with
$22 billion in debt "offer" to build a $200 million attraction 4 miles from their facility?